These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Comparing supervisors' self-evaluations to their administrators' evaluations. Waldman DA; Thornton GC Med Group Manage; 1979; 26(1):22, 24, 58. PubMed ID: 10240188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Time documentation of clinical nurse specialist activities. Robichaud AM; Hamric AB J Nurs Adm; 1986 Jan; 16(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 3632805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The decisive factor in promotion. Kuch R; Bru G Nurs Manage; 1987 Feb; 18(2):66, 68. PubMed ID: 3645431 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Capturing supervisor rating policies: a way to improve performance appraisal effectiveness. Hobson CJ; Gibson FW Pers Adm; 1984 Mar; 29(3):59-68. PubMed ID: 10265501 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Formulating usable objectives for manager performance appraisal. Allan P; Rosenberg S Pers J; 1978 Nov; 57(11):626-9, 640, 642. PubMed ID: 10239501 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Japanese management. Implications for nursing administration. Smith HL; Reinow FD; Reid RA J Nurs Adm; 1984 Sep; 14(9):33-9. PubMed ID: 6565756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The nurse executive in a community hospital. Tranbarger R Ser Nurs Adm; 1988; 1():102-20. PubMed ID: 3274236 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The performance appraisal interview: putting it all together. Simpson DB Health Care Superv; 1985 Jan; 3(2):63-76. PubMed ID: 10270649 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]