These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

369 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23632951)

  • 1. Comparison of standardized uptake values in normal structures between PET/CT and PET/MRI in an oncology patient population.
    Kershah S; Partovi S; Traughber BJ; Muzic RF; Schluchter MD; O'Donnell JK; Faulhaber P
    Mol Imaging Biol; 2013 Dec; 15(6):776-85. PubMed ID: 23632951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Standardized uptake values for [¹⁸F] FDG in normal organ tissues: comparison of whole-body PET/CT and PET/MRI.
    Heusch P; Buchbender C; Beiderwellen K; Nensa F; Hartung-Knemeyer V; Lauenstein TC; Bockisch A; Forsting M; Antoch G; Heusner TA
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 May; 82(5):870-6. PubMed ID: 23394765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preclinical evaluation of MR attenuation correction versus CT attenuation correction on a sequential whole-body MR/PET scanner.
    Bini J; Izquierdo-Garcia D; Mateo J; Machac J; Narula J; Fuster V; Fayad ZA
    Invest Radiol; 2013 May; 48(5):313-22. PubMed ID: 23296082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of whole-body PET/CT and PET/MRI in breast cancer patients: lesion detection and quantitation of 18F-deoxyglucose uptake in lesions and in normal organ tissues.
    Pace L; Nicolai E; Luongo A; Aiello M; Catalano OA; Soricelli A; Salvatore M
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Feb; 83(2):289-96. PubMed ID: 24331845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Standardized Uptake Values in Normal Structures Between PET/CT and PET/MRI in a Tertiary Pediatric Hospital: A Prospective Study.
    Lyons K; Seghers V; Sorensen JI; Zhang W; Paldino MJ; Krishnamurthy R; Rohren EM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Nov; 205(5):1094-101. PubMed ID: 26496558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of MR-Based Attenuation Correction of a Newly Released Whole-Body Simultaneous PET/MR System.
    Liu G; Cao T; Hu L; Zheng J; Pang L; Hu P; Gu Y; Shi H
    Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():8213215. PubMed ID: 31886254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical assessment of MR-guided 3-class and 4-class attenuation correction in PET/MR.
    Arabi H; Rager O; Alem A; Varoquaux A; Becker M; Zaidi H
    Mol Imaging Biol; 2015 Apr; 17(2):264-76. PubMed ID: 25096328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Semiquantitative Assessment of
    Minamimoto R; Xu G; Jamali M; Holley D; Barkhodari A; Zaharchuk G; Iagaru A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Nov; 209(5):1136-1142. PubMed ID: 28777652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) with the standardized uptake value (SUV) in hybrid 18F-FDG PET/MRI in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) lesions: initial results.
    Heusch P; Buchbender C; Köhler J; Nensa F; Beiderwellen K; Kühl H; Lanzman RS; Wittsack HJ; Gomez B; Gauler T; Schuler M; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G; Heusner TA
    Rofo; 2013 Nov; 185(11):1056-62. PubMed ID: 23860802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correlation between standardized uptake value and apparent diffusion coefficient of neoplastic lesions evaluated with whole-body simultaneous hybrid PET/MRI.
    Rakheja R; Chandarana H; DeMello L; Jackson K; Geppert C; Faul D; Glielmi C; Friedman KP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Nov; 201(5):1115-9. PubMed ID: 24147485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Standardized Uptake Values from PET/MRI in Metastatic Breast Cancer: An Organ-based Comparison With PET/CT.
    Pujara AC; Raad RA; Ponzo F; Wassong C; Babb JS; Moy L; Melsaether AN
    Breast J; 2016 May; 22(3):264-73. PubMed ID: 26843433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ferumoxytol Does Not Impact Standardized Uptake Values on PET/MR Scans.
    Muehe AM; Yerneni K; Theruvath AJ; Thakor AS; Pribnow A; Avedian R; Steffner R; Rosenberg J; Hawk KE; Daldrup-Link HE
    Mol Imaging Biol; 2020 Jun; 22(3):722-729. PubMed ID: 31325083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Qualitative FDG PET Image Assessment Using Automated Three-Segment MR Attenuation Correction Versus CT Attenuation Correction in a Tertiary Pediatric Hospital: A Prospective Study.
    Lyons K; Seghers V; Williams JL; Sorensen JI; Paldino MJ; Krishnamurthy R; Rohren EM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Sep; 205(3):652-8. PubMed ID: 26295654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hybrid ZTE/Dixon MR-based attenuation correction for quantitative uptake estimation of pelvic lesions in PET/MRI.
    Leynes AP; Yang J; Shanbhag DD; Kaushik SS; Seo Y; Hope TA; Wiesinger F; Larson PE
    Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):902-913. PubMed ID: 28112410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitative carotid PET/MR imaging: clinical evaluation of MR-Attenuation correction versus CT-Attenuation correction in (18)F-FDG PET/MR emission data and comparison to PET/CT.
    Bini J; Robson PM; Calcagno C; Eldib M; Fayad ZA
    Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015; 5(3):293-304. PubMed ID: 26069863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correction of quantification errors in pelvic and spinal lesions caused by ignoring higher photon attenuation of bone in [18F]NaF PET/MR.
    Schramm G; Maus J; Hofheinz F; Petr J; Lougovski A; Beuthien-Baumann B; Oehme L; Platzek I; van den Hoff J
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6468-76. PubMed ID: 26520736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative characterisation of clinically significant intra-prostatic cancer by prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression and cell density on PSMA-11.
    Domachevsky L; Goldberg N; Bernstine H; Nidam M; Groshar D
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Dec; 28(12):5275-5283. PubMed ID: 29846803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of MR-based attenuation correction and CT-based attenuation correction of whole-body PET/MR imaging.
    Izquierdo-Garcia D; Sawiak SJ; Knesaurek K; Narula J; Fuster V; Machac J; Fayad ZA
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2014 Aug; 41(8):1574-84. PubMed ID: 24652234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability of
    Jena A; Taneja S; Singh A; Negi P; Sarin R; Das PK; Singhal M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Sep; 209(3):662-670. PubMed ID: 28678576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measurement of apparent diffusion coefficient with simultaneous MR/positron emission tomography in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis: comparison with 18F-FDG-PET.
    Schwenzer NF; Schmidt H; Gatidis S; Brendle C; Müller M; Königsrainer I; Claussen CD; Pfannenberg AC; Schraml C
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Nov; 40(5):1121-8. PubMed ID: 24923481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.