These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23633179)
1. Stimulus specificity and dishabituation of operant responding in humans. Kenzer AL; Ghezzi PM; Fuller T J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 Jul; 100(1):61-78. PubMed ID: 23633179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A preliminary evaluation of habituation and dishabituation of operant responding in mice. Vitale NL; Lewon M Behav Processes; 2023 Nov; 213():104967. PubMed ID: 37979922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Social reinforcement of operant behavior in rats: a methodological note. Evans MJ; Duvel A; Funk ML; Lehman B; Sparrow J; Watson NT; Neuringer A J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 Jul; 62(1):149-56. PubMed ID: 8064210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nicotine and methamphetamine disrupt habituation of sensory reinforcer effectiveness in male rats. Lloyd DR; Hausknecht KA; Richards JB Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2014 Apr; 22(2):166-75. PubMed ID: 24708147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Decreased environmental complexity during development impairs habituation of reinforcer effectiveness of sensory stimuli. Wang R; Hausknecht KA; Haj-Dahmane S; Shen RY; Richards JB Behav Brain Res; 2018 Jan; 337():53-60. PubMed ID: 28943426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Within-session rates of responding when reinforcer magnitude is changed within the session. Weatherly JN; McSweeney FK; Swindell S J Gen Psychol; 2004 Jan; 131(1):5-16. PubMed ID: 14977028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Resistance to extinction following habituation to behaviourally disruptive novel stimuli. Haggbloom SJ; Brewer VR Q J Exp Psychol B; 1989 Nov; 41(4):369-80. PubMed ID: 2595008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Operant behavior in dwarf hamsters (Phodopus campbelli): Effects of rate of reinforcement and reinforcer flavor variety. Lupfer-Johnson G; Murphy ES; Blackwell LC; LaCasse JL; Drummond S Behav Processes; 2010 Jun; 84(2):573-80. PubMed ID: 20188801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Drug effects on responding maintained by stimulus-reinforcer and response-reinforcer contingencies. Spealman RD; Katz JL; Witkin JM J Exp Anal Behav; 1978 Sep; 30(2):187-96. PubMed ID: 702026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Unblocking in Pavlovian appetitive conditioning. Holland PC J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1984 Oct; 10(4):476-97. PubMed ID: 6491608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The relation of multiple-schedule behavioral contrast to deprivation, time in session, and within-session changes in responding. McSweeney FK; Swindell S; Murphy ES; Kowal BP Learn Behav; 2004 May; 32(2):190-201. PubMed ID: 15281391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Magazine approach during a signal for food depends on Pavlovian, not instrumental, conditioning. Harris JA; Andrew BJ; Kwok DW J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2013 Apr; 39(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 23421397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Response strength of young children in operant audiometry. Primus MA; Thompson G J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Dec; 28(4):539-47. PubMed ID: 4087889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relations between Pavlovian-instrumental transfer and reinforcer devaluation. Holland PC J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2004 Apr; 30(2):104-17. PubMed ID: 15078120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]