205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23634183)
21. The Accuracy of Pre-Endoscopic Scores for Mortality Prediction in Patients with Upper GI Bleeding and No Endoscopy Performed.
Cazacu SM; Alexandru DO; Statie RC; Iordache S; Ungureanu BS; Iovănescu VF; Popa P; Sacerdoțianu VM; Neagoe CD; Florescu MM
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Mar; 13(6):. PubMed ID: 36980496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. External validation of scoring systems in risk stratification of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Anchu AC; Mohsina S; Sureshkumar S; Mahalakshmy T; Kate V
Indian J Gastroenterol; 2017 Mar; 36(2):105-112. PubMed ID: 28393330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prospective Comparison of the AIMS65 Score, Glasgow-Blatchford Score, and Rockall Score for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Variceal and Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
Chang A; Ouejiaraphant C; Akarapatima K; Rattanasupa A; Prachayakul V
Clin Endosc; 2021 Mar; 54(2):211-221. PubMed ID: 32668528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A simplified clinical risk score predicts the need for early endoscopy in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Tammaro L; Buda A; Di Paolo MC; Zullo A; Hassan C; Riccio E; Vassallo R; Caserta L; Anderloni A; Natali A; ;
Dig Liver Dis; 2014 Sep; 46(9):783-7. PubMed ID: 24953205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems for the prediction of the risk of in-hospital death among patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Lu X; Zhang X; Chen H
Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2020 Jun; 112(6):467-473. PubMed ID: 32379473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prospective comparison of three risk scoring systems in non-variceal and variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Thanapirom K; Ridtitid W; Rerknimitr R; Thungsuk R; Noophun P; Wongjitrat C; Luangjaru S; Vedkijkul P; Lertkupinit C; Poonsab S; Ratanachu-ek T; Hansomburana P; Pornthisarn B; Thongbai T; Mahachai V; Treeprasertsuk S
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 Apr; 31(4):761-7. PubMed ID: 26514879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of the quick SOFA score with Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scores in predicting severity in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Taslidere B; Sonmez E; Özcan AB; Mehmetaj L; Keskin EB; Gulen B
Am J Emerg Med; 2021 Jul; 45():29-36. PubMed ID: 33647759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Previous Use of Antithrombotic Agents Reduces Mortality and Length of Hospital Stay in Patients With High-risk Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
Dunne PDJ; Laursen SB; Laine L; Dalton HR; Ngu JH; Schultz M; Rahman A; Anderloni A; Murray IA; Stanley AJ
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Feb; 17(3):440-447.e2. PubMed ID: 29705263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Clinical Performance of Prediction Rules and Nasogastric Lavage for the Evaluation of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Retrospective Observational Study.
Dakik HK; Srygley FD; Chiu ST; Chow SC; Fisher DA
Gastroenterol Res Pract; 2017; 2017():3171697. PubMed ID: 28246528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage Severity Triage: Locally Derived Score May Outperform Existing Scoring Systems.
Chaikitamnuaychok R; Patumanond J
Gastroenterology Res; 2015 Apr; 8(2):186-192. PubMed ID: 27785294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Analysis of risk scoring for the outpatient management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Chan JCH; Ayaru L
Frontline Gastroenterol; 2011 Jan; 2(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 28839577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Video capsule endoscopy for upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage in the emergency department: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Shah N; Chen C; Montano N; Cave D; Siegel R; Gentile NT; Limkakeng AT; Kumar AB; Ma Y; Meltzer AC
Am J Emerg Med; 2020 Jun; 38(6):1245-1252. PubMed ID: 32229221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. MAP(ASH): A new scoring system for the prediction of intervention and mortality in upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Redondo-Cerezo E; Vadillo-Calles F; Stanley AJ; Laursen S; Laine L; Dalton HR; Ngu JH; Schultz M; Jiménez-Rosales R
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Jan; 35(1):82-89. PubMed ID: 31359521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.
Yaka E; Yılmaz S; Doğan NÖ; Pekdemir M
Acad Emerg Med; 2015 Jan; 22(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 25556538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of four scoring systems for risk stratification of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Tuncer H; Yardan T; Akdemir HU; Ayyildiz T
Pak J Med Sci; 2018; 34(3):649-654. PubMed ID: 30034432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. VALIDATION OF THE ROCKALL SCORE IN UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT BLEEDING IN A COLOMBIAN TERTIARY HOSPITAL.
Frías-Ordoñez JS; Arjona-Granados DA; Urrego-Díaz JA; Briceño-Torres M; Martínez-Marín JD
Arq Gastroenterol; 2022; 59(1):80-88. PubMed ID: 35442342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A modified Glasgow Blatchford Score improves risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleed: a prospective comparison of scoring systems.
Cheng DW; Lu YW; Teller T; Sekhon HK; Wu BU
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2012 Oct; 36(8):782-9. PubMed ID: 22928529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of Glasgow-Blatchford score and full Rockall score systems to predict clinical outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Mokhtare M; Bozorgi V; Agah S; Nikkhah M; Faghihi A; Boghratian A; Shalbaf N; Khanlari A; Seifmanesh H
Clin Exp Gastroenterol; 2016; 9():337-343. PubMed ID: 27826205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of scoring systems without endoscopic findings for predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Ko IG; Kim SE; Chang BS; Kwak MS; Yoon JY; Cha JM; Shin HP; Lee JI; Kim SH; Han JH; Jeon JW
BMC Gastroenterol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):159. PubMed ID: 29233096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Antithrombotic drugs and non-variceal bleeding outcomes and risk scoring systems: comparison of Glasgow Blatchford, Rockall and Charlson scores.
Taha AS; McCloskey C; Craigen T; Angerson WJ
Frontline Gastroenterol; 2016 Oct; 7(4):257-263. PubMed ID: 28839866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
