BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23635740)

  • 1. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of successful Kielland's rotational forceps delivery.
    Stock SJ; Josephs K; Farquharson S; Love C; Cooper SE; Kissack C; Akolekar R; Norman JE; Denison FC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2013 May; 121(5):1032-1039. PubMed ID: 23635740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Kielland's rotational forceps delivery: A comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes with rotational ventouse or second stage caesarean section deliveries.
    Giacchino T; Karkia R; Zhang W; Beta J; Ahmed H; Akolekar R
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Nov; 254():175-180. PubMed ID: 32987337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Kielland's rotational forceps delivery: comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes with pregnancies delivering by non-rotational forceps.
    Giacchino T; Karkia R; Zhang W; Ahmed H; Akolekar R
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Apr; 42(3):379-384. PubMed ID: 34030603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maternal and neonatal complications following Kielland's rotational forceps delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Giacchino T; Karkia R; Ahmed H; Akolekar R
    BJOG; 2023 Jul; 130(8):856-864. PubMed ID: 36694989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Kielland's forceps: does it increase the risk of anal sphincter injuries? An observational study.
    Gauthaman N; Henry D; Ster IC; Khunda A; Doumouchtsis SK
    Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Oct; 26(10):1525-32. PubMed ID: 25990206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rotational vaginal delivery with Kielland's forceps: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness and safety outcomes.
    Al Wattar BH; Al Wattar B; Gallos I; Pirie AM
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Dec; 27(6):438-44. PubMed ID: 26485456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Kielland's forceps or ventouse--a comparison.
    Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P; Boonrangsimant P
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1988 May; 95(5):483-7. PubMed ID: 3401434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Kielland's forceps. From controversy to consensus?
    Nash Z; Nathan B; Mascarenhas L
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Jan; 94(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 25233861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Should we abandon Kielland's forceps?
    Cardozo LD; Gibb DM; Studd JW; Cooper DJ
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1983 Jul; 287(6388):315-7. PubMed ID: 6409289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use and safety of Kielland's forceps in current obstetric practice.
    Burke N; Field K; Mujahid F; Morrison JJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Oct; 120(4):766-70. PubMed ID: 22996093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intrapartum ultrasound during rotational forceps delivery: a novel tool for safety, quality control, and teaching.
    Hinkson L; Henrich W; Tutschek B
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 224(1):93.e1-93.e7. PubMed ID: 32693095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of successful Kielland's rotational forceps delivery.
    Le Ray C; Théau A; Goffinet F
    Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Sep; 122(3):695. PubMed ID: 23963413
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Kielland's forceps delivery: is it a dying art?
    Tan KH; Sim R; Yam KL
    Singapore Med J; 1992 Aug; 33(4):380-2. PubMed ID: 1411670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Kjelland's forceps in the new millennium. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of attempted rotational forceps delivery.
    Al-Suhel R; Gill S; Robson S; Shadbolt B
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Oct; 49(5):510-4. PubMed ID: 19780735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Kielland's forceps: association with neonatal morbidity and mortality.
    Chiswick ML; James DK
    Br Med J; 1979 Jan; 1(6155):7-9. PubMed ID: 760969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to the instrument used for mid-cavity rotational operative vaginal delivery: a prospective cohort study.
    Bahl R; Van de Venne M; Macleod M; Strachan B; Murphy DJ
    BJOG; 2013 Nov; 120(12):1526-32. PubMed ID: 23924292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Forceps: towards obsolescence or revival?
    Dietz HP
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Apr; 94(4):347-51. PubMed ID: 25625336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rotational delivery of the fetus: Kielland's forceps and two other methods compared.
    Healy DL; Quinn MA; Pepperell RJ
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1982 Jul; 89(7):501-6. PubMed ID: 7093162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rotational delivery with Kielland's forceps.
    Chow SL; Johnson CM; Anderson TD; Hughes JH
    Med J Aust; 1987 Jun; 146(12):616-9. PubMed ID: 3626909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes with forceps delivery versus cesarean delivery.
    Liu X; Landon MB; Cheng W; Chen Y
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Jan; 33(2):307-313. PubMed ID: 29909749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.