139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23635838)
1. Treatment frequency and efficiency in hemodiafiltration.
Beck W; Techert F; Lebsanft H; Haug U; Deppisch R; Ledebo I; Wizemann V
Blood Purif; 2013; 35(1-3):224-9. PubMed ID: 23635838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hemodiafiltration--a new treatment option for hyperphosphatemia in hemodialysis patients.
Zehnder C; Gutzwiller JP; Renggli K
Clin Nephrol; 1999 Sep; 52(3):152-9. PubMed ID: 10499310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. On-line mixed hemodiafiltration with a feedback for ultrafiltration control: effect on middle-molecule removal.
Pedrini LA; De Cristofaro V
Kidney Int; 2003 Oct; 64(4):1505-13. PubMed ID: 12969172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reprocessing high-flux polysulfone dialyzers does not negatively impact solute removal in short-daily online hemodiafiltration.
Melo NC; Moyses RM; Elias RM; Castro MC
Hemodial Int; 2014 Apr; 18(2):473-80. PubMed ID: 24393428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mixed predilution and postdilution online hemodiafiltration compared with the traditional infusion modes.
Pedrini LA; De Cristofaro V; Pagliari B; Samà F
Kidney Int; 2000 Nov; 58(5):2155-65. PubMed ID: 11044237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Middle molecules removal. Beyond beta2-microglobulin].
Maduell F; Sánchez-Canel JJ; Blasco JA; Navarro V; Ríus A; Torregrosa E; Pin MT; Cruz C; Ferrero JA
Nefrologia; 2006; 26(4):469-75. PubMed ID: 17058859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Acute hemodynamic response and uremic toxin removal in conventional and extended hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration: a randomized crossover study.
Cornelis T; van der Sande FM; Eloot S; Cardinaels E; Bekers O; Damoiseaux J; Leunissen KM; Kooman JP
Am J Kidney Dis; 2014 Aug; 64(2):247-56. PubMed ID: 24698199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pilot study to assess increased dialysis efficiency in patients with limited blood flow rates due to vascular access problems.
Mandolfo S; Borlandelli S; Imbasciati E; Badalamenti S; Graziani G; Sereni L; Varesani M; Wratten ML; Corsi A; Elli A
Hemodial Int; 2008 Jan; 12(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 18271842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [On-line haemodiafiltration with sorbent-regenerated ultrafiltrate as replacement fluid: Beta2-microglobulin removal versus filtration fraction].
Emiliani G; Briganti M; Montanari A; Isola E; Fusaroli M
G Ital Nefrol; 2004; 21 Suppl 30():S80-4. PubMed ID: 15747312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vivo removal of high- and low-molecular-weight compounds in hemodiafiltration with on-line regeneration of ultrafiltrate.
Testa A; Gentilhomme H; Le Carrer D; Orsonneau JL
Nephron Clin Pract; 2006; 104(1):c55-60. PubMed ID: 16741371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Change from three times a week on-line hemodiafiltration to short daily on-line hemodiafiltration.
Maduell F; Navarro V; Torregrosa E; Rius A; Dicenta F; Cruz MC; Ferrero JA
Kidney Int; 2003 Jul; 64(1):305-13. PubMed ID: 12787423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimization of mid-dilution haemodiafiltration: technique and performance.
Pedrini LA; Feliciani A; Zerbi S; Cozzi G; Ruggiero P
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2009 Sep; 24(9):2816-24. PubMed ID: 19420103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On-line hemodiafiltration with pre- and postdilution: a comparison of efficacy.
Ahrenholz P; Winkler RE; Ramlow W; Tiess M; Müller W
Int J Artif Organs; 1997 Feb; 20(2):81-90. PubMed ID: 9093885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optical Estimation of Beta 2 Microglobulin during Hemodiafiltration – Does It Work?
Uhlin F; Holmar J; Yngman-Uhlin P; Fernström A; Fridolin I
Blood Purif; 2015; 40(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 26159848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy and safety of the Clearum dialyzer.
Maduell F; Broseta JJ; Rodríguez-Espinosa D; Hermida-Lama E; Cuadrado-Payán E; Rodas LM; Gómez M; Arias-Guillén M; Fontseré N; Vera M; Rico N
Artif Organs; 2021 Oct; 45(10):1195-1201. PubMed ID: 33978975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [On-line sequential hemodiafiltration (HDF-OL-S): a new therapeutic option].
Kanter J; Puerta MC; García RP; Gómez JM; Jofré R; Rodríguez PB
Nefrologia; 2008; 28(4):433-8. PubMed ID: 18662152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Leptin and beta2-microglobulin kinetics with three different dialysis modalities.
Mandolfo S; Borlandelli S; Imbasciati E
Int J Artif Organs; 2006 Oct; 29(10):949-55. PubMed ID: 17211816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimization of dialysate flow in on-line hemodiafiltration.
Maduell F; Ojeda R; Arias-Guillén M; Fontseré N; Vera M; Massó E; Gómez M; Rodas L; Bazán G; Jiménez-Hernández M; Piñeiro G; Rico N
Nefrologia; 2015; 35(5):473-8. PubMed ID: 26306957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical comparison of super high-flux HD and on-line HDF.
Fujimori A
Blood Purif; 2013; 35 Suppl 1():81-4. PubMed ID: 23466386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Elimination of large uremic toxins by a dialyzer specifically designed for high-volume convective therapies.
Maduell F; Arias-Guillen M; Fontseré N; Ojeda R; Rico N; Vera M; Elena M; Bedini JL; Wieneke P; Campistol JM
Blood Purif; 2014; 37(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 24662288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
