These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23635897)

  • 21. Clinical and radiographic comparison of primary molars after formocresol and electrosurgical pulpotomy: a randomized clinical trial.
    Bahrololoomi Z; Moeintaghavi A; Emtiazi M; Hosseini G
    Indian J Dent Res; 2008; 19(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 18797098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. How does zinc oxide-eugenol compare to ferric sulphate as a pulpotomy material?
    Chien MM; Setzer S; Cleaton-Jones P
    SADJ; 2001 Mar; 56(3):130-5. PubMed ID: 16894712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of electrosurgical and formocresol pulpotomy procedures in children.
    Dean JA; Mack RB; Fulkerson BT; Sanders BJ
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2002 May; 12(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 12028309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Pulpal therapy for primary teeth: formocresol vs electrosurgery: a clinical study.
    Rivera N; Reyes E; Mazzaoui S; Morón A
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(1):71-3. PubMed ID: 12762614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Permanent versus temporary restorations after emergency pulpotomies in primary molars.
    Guelmann M; Fair J; Bimstein E
    Pediatr Dent; 2005; 27(6):478-81. PubMed ID: 16532888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [An 18 month evaluation of MM-MTA pulpotomy on primary decayed molars].
    Abou Chedid JC; Mchayleh N; Khalil I; Melki B; Hardan LS
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2015 Dec; 38(152):17-24. PubMed ID: 26939217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Success rate of formocresol pulpotomy in primary molars restored with stainless steel crown vs amalga.
    Holan G; Fuks AB; Ketlz N
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(3):212-6. PubMed ID: 12064493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Caries control and other variables associated with success of primary molar vital pulp therapy.
    Vij R; Coll JA; Shelton P; Farooq NS
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 15185801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessment of a novel alternative to conventional formocresol-zinc oxide eugenol pulpotomy for the treatment of pulpally involved human primary teeth: diode laser-mineral trioxide aggregate pulpotomy.
    Saltzman B; Sigal M; Clokie C; Rukavina J; Titley K; Kulkarni GV
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2005 Nov; 15(6):437-47. PubMed ID: 16238654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of Portland cement added to radiopacifying agents in primary molar pulpotomies.
    Lourenço Neto N; Marques NC; Fernandes AP; Hungaro Duarte MA; Abdo RC; Machado MA; Oliveira TM
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2015 Oct; 16(5):377-82. PubMed ID: 25788172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Primary molar pulpotomies with different hemorrhage control agents and base materials: A randomized clinical trial.
    Atasever G; Keceli TI; Uysal S; Gungor HC; Olmez S
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Mar; 22(3):305-312. PubMed ID: 30837416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of vital pulp therapy in open apex teeth with MTA and ZOE.
    Ghoddusi J; Shahrami F; Alizadeh M; Kianoush K; Forghani M
    N Y State Dent J; 2012 Apr; 78(3):34-8. PubMed ID: 22803275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Electrosurgical pulpotomy: a retrospective human study.
    Mack RB; Dean JA
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1993; 60(2):107-14. PubMed ID: 8486853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Formocresol versus calcium hydroxide direct pulp capping of human primary molars: two year follow-up.
    Aminabadi NA; Farahani RM; Oskouei SG
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 34(4):317-21. PubMed ID: 20831133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinical evaluation of glutaraldehyde with calcium hydroxide and glutaraldehyde with zinc oxide eugenol in pulpotomy of primary molars.
    Shumayrikh NM; Adenubi JO
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 1999 Dec; 15(6):259-64. PubMed ID: 10825836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of zinc oxide and eugenol, and Vitapex for root canal treatment of necrotic primary teeth.
    Mortazavi M; Mesbahi M
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2004 Nov; 14(6):417-24. PubMed ID: 15525310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol pulpotomy of primary teeth: a 2-year follow-up.
    Ansari G; Ranjpour M
    Int Endod J; 2010 May; 43(5):413-8. PubMed ID: 20518934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Zinc oxide-eugenol pulpotomy and stainless steel crown restoration of a primary molar.
    Croll TP; Killian CM
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Jun; 23(6):383-8. PubMed ID: 1502315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Calcium enriched mixture cement for primary molars exhibiting root perforations and extensive root resorption: report of three cases.
    Tavassoli-Hojjati S; Kameli S; Rahimian-Emam S; Ahmadyar M; Asgary S
    Pediatr Dent; 2014; 36(1):23E-27E. PubMed ID: 24717704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Equivalency study of histological responses to complete or partial pulpotomies in inflamed baboon immature first permanent molars.
    Cleaton-Jones P; Duggal M; Parak R; Williams S; Setzer S
    SADJ; 2007 Mar; 62(2):062-5. PubMed ID: 17624175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.