These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23635897)
21. Clinical and radiographic comparison of primary molars after formocresol and electrosurgical pulpotomy: a randomized clinical trial. Bahrololoomi Z; Moeintaghavi A; Emtiazi M; Hosseini G Indian J Dent Res; 2008; 19(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 18797098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. How does zinc oxide-eugenol compare to ferric sulphate as a pulpotomy material? Chien MM; Setzer S; Cleaton-Jones P SADJ; 2001 Mar; 56(3):130-5. PubMed ID: 16894712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of electrosurgical and formocresol pulpotomy procedures in children. Dean JA; Mack RB; Fulkerson BT; Sanders BJ Int J Paediatr Dent; 2002 May; 12(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 12028309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Pulpal therapy for primary teeth: formocresol vs electrosurgery: a clinical study. Rivera N; Reyes E; Mazzaoui S; Morón A J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(1):71-3. PubMed ID: 12762614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Permanent versus temporary restorations after emergency pulpotomies in primary molars. Guelmann M; Fair J; Bimstein E Pediatr Dent; 2005; 27(6):478-81. PubMed ID: 16532888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Primary molar pulpotomies with different hemorrhage control agents and base materials: A randomized clinical trial. Atasever G; Keceli TI; Uysal S; Gungor HC; Olmez S Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Mar; 22(3):305-312. PubMed ID: 30837416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of vital pulp therapy in open apex teeth with MTA and ZOE. Ghoddusi J; Shahrami F; Alizadeh M; Kianoush K; Forghani M N Y State Dent J; 2012 Apr; 78(3):34-8. PubMed ID: 22803275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Electrosurgical pulpotomy: a retrospective human study. Mack RB; Dean JA ASDC J Dent Child; 1993; 60(2):107-14. PubMed ID: 8486853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Formocresol versus calcium hydroxide direct pulp capping of human primary molars: two year follow-up. Aminabadi NA; Farahani RM; Oskouei SG J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 34(4):317-21. PubMed ID: 20831133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Clinical evaluation of glutaraldehyde with calcium hydroxide and glutaraldehyde with zinc oxide eugenol in pulpotomy of primary molars. Shumayrikh NM; Adenubi JO Endod Dent Traumatol; 1999 Dec; 15(6):259-64. PubMed ID: 10825836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of zinc oxide and eugenol, and Vitapex for root canal treatment of necrotic primary teeth. Mortazavi M; Mesbahi M Int J Paediatr Dent; 2004 Nov; 14(6):417-24. PubMed ID: 15525310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol pulpotomy of primary teeth: a 2-year follow-up. Ansari G; Ranjpour M Int Endod J; 2010 May; 43(5):413-8. PubMed ID: 20518934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Zinc oxide-eugenol pulpotomy and stainless steel crown restoration of a primary molar. Croll TP; Killian CM Quintessence Int; 1992 Jun; 23(6):383-8. PubMed ID: 1502315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Calcium enriched mixture cement for primary molars exhibiting root perforations and extensive root resorption: report of three cases. Tavassoli-Hojjati S; Kameli S; Rahimian-Emam S; Ahmadyar M; Asgary S Pediatr Dent; 2014; 36(1):23E-27E. PubMed ID: 24717704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Equivalency study of histological responses to complete or partial pulpotomies in inflamed baboon immature first permanent molars. Cleaton-Jones P; Duggal M; Parak R; Williams S; Setzer S SADJ; 2007 Mar; 62(2):062-5. PubMed ID: 17624175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]