1671 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23636208)
21. The relationship between high-frequency pure-tone hearing loss, hearing in noise test (HINT) thresholds, and the articulation index.
Vermiglio AJ; Soli SD; Freed DJ; Fisher LM
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):779-88. PubMed ID: 23169195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The effect of hearing aid technologies on listening in an automobile.
Wu YH; Stangl E; Bentler RA; Stanziola RW
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):474-85. PubMed ID: 23886425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Outcomes of Hearing Aid Use by Individuals with Unilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss (USNHL).
Bishop CE; Hamadain E; Galster JA; Johnson MF; Spankovich C; Windmill I
J Am Acad Audiol; 2017; 28(10):941-949. PubMed ID: 29130442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Application of frequency importance functions to directivity for prediction of benefit in uniform fields.
Ricketts TA; Henry PP; Hornsby BW
Ear Hear; 2005 Oct; 26(5):473-86. PubMed ID: 16230897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The effect of intensity perturbations on speech intelligibility for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
van Schijndel NH; Houtgast T; Festen JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 May; 109(5 Pt 1):2202-10. PubMed ID: 11386571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The effects of selective consonant amplification on sentence recognition in noise by hearing-impaired listeners.
Saripella R; Loizou PC; Thibodeau L; Alford JA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3028-37. PubMed ID: 22087930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response.
Ohlenforst B; Wendt D; Kramer SE; Naylor G; Zekveld AA; Lunner T
Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():90-99. PubMed ID: 29779607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Speech Recognition at the Acceptable Noise Level.
Gordon-Hickey S; Morlas H
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 May; 26(5):443-450. PubMed ID: 26055834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Electrophysiology and Perception of Speech in Noise in Older Listeners: Effects of Hearing Impairment and Age.
Billings CJ; Penman TM; McMillan GP; Ellis EM
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):710-22. PubMed ID: 26502191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Efficacy of a reverse cardioid directional microphone.
Kuk F; Keenan D
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Jan; 23(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 22284842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Speech perception in gated noise: the effects of temporal resolution.
Jin SH; Nelson PB
J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 May; 119(5 Pt 1):3097-108. PubMed ID: 16708964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The effects of energetic and informational masking on The Words-in-Noise Test (WIN).
Wilson RH; Trivette CP; Williams DA; Watts KL
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(7):522-33. PubMed ID: 22992259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effects of age and hearing impairment on the ability to benefit from temporal and spectral modulation.
Hall JW; Buss E; Grose JH; Roush PA
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 22237164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Spatial benefit of bilateral hearing AIDS.
Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR; Dubno JR
Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):203-18. PubMed ID: 19194292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Sentence recognition in noise and perceived benefit of noise reduction on the receiver and transmitter sides of a BICROS hearing aid.
Oeding K; Valente M
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):980-91. PubMed ID: 24384083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Conclusion: predicting speech intelligibility by individual hearing-impaired listeners: the path forward.
Grant KW; Bernstein JG; Summers V
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):329-36. PubMed ID: 23636212
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Predicted and measured speech recognition performance in noise with linear amplification.
Magnusson L; Karlsson M; Leijon A
Ear Hear; 2001 Feb; 22(1):46-57. PubMed ID: 11271975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The Revised Speech Perception in Noise Test (R-SPIN) in a multiple signal-to-noise ratio paradigm.
Wilson RH; McArdle R; Watts KL; Smith SL
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Sep; 23(8):590-605. PubMed ID: 22967734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Behavioral measures of cochlear compression and temporal resolution as predictors of speech masking release in hearing-impaired listeners.
Gregan MJ; Nelson PB; Oxenham AJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):2895-912. PubMed ID: 24116426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
