1329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23636209)
1. Suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise: hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
Summers V; Makashay MJ; Theodoroff SM; Leek MR
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):274-92. PubMed ID: 23636209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Auditory models of suprathreshold distortion and speech intelligibility in persons with impaired hearing.
Bernstein JG; Summers V; Grassi E; Grant KW
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):307-28. PubMed ID: 23636211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners.
Grant KW; Walden TC
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):258-73; quiz 337-8. PubMed ID: 23636208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity as a predictor of speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners.
Bernstein JG; Mehraei G; Shamma S; Gallun FJ; Theodoroff SM; Leek MR
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):293-306. PubMed ID: 23636210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Suprathreshold auditory processing deficits in noise: Effects of hearing loss and age.
Kortlang S; Mauermann M; Ewert SD
Hear Res; 2016 Jan; 331():27-40. PubMed ID: 26471199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity for hearing-impaired listeners: dependence on carrier center frequency and the relationship to speech intelligibility.
Mehraei G; Gallun FJ; Leek MR; Bernstein JG
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jul; 136(1):301-16. PubMed ID: 24993215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of age and hearing impairment on the ability to benefit from temporal and spectral modulation.
Hall JW; Buss E; Grose JH; Roush PA
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 22237164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Consonant identification in noise using Hilbert-transform temporal fine-structure speech and recovered-envelope speech for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
Léger AC; Reed CM; Desloge JG; Swaminathan J; Braida LD
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):389-403. PubMed ID: 26233038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
Völker C; Warzybok A; Ernst SM
Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection threshold for sound distortion resulting from noise reduction in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Brons I; Dreschler WA; Houben R
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1375. PubMed ID: 25190410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relations between frequency selectivity, temporal fine-structure processing, and speech reception in impaired hearing.
Strelcyk O; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3328-45. PubMed ID: 19425674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Behavioral measures of cochlear compression and temporal resolution as predictors of speech masking release in hearing-impaired listeners.
Gregan MJ; Nelson PB; Oxenham AJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):2895-912. PubMed ID: 24116426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Abnormal intelligibility of speech in competing speech and in noise in a frequency region where audiometric thresholds are near-normal for hearing-impaired listeners.
Léger AC; Ives DT; Lorenzi C
Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():102-9. PubMed ID: 25124152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors affecting masking release for speech in modulated noise for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
George EL; Festen JM; Houtgast T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Oct; 120(4):2295-311. PubMed ID: 17069325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Abnormal speech processing in frequency regions where absolute thresholds are normal for listeners with high-frequency hearing loss.
Léger AC; Moore BC; Lorenzi C
Hear Res; 2012 Dec; 294(1-2):95-103. PubMed ID: 23104012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities?
Neher T; Laugesen S; Jensen NS; Kragelund L
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1542-58. PubMed ID: 21895093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Masking release for hearing-impaired listeners: The effect of increased audibility through reduction of amplitude variability.
Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD; Perez ZD; D'Aquila LA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4452. PubMed ID: 28679277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interrupted speech perception: the effects of hearing sensitivity and frequency resolution.
Jin SH; Nelson PB
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Aug; 128(2):881-9. PubMed ID: 20707457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
