These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23637011)

  • 1. Individual differences in fixation duration distributions in reading.
    Staub A; Benatar A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Dec; 20(6):1304-11. PubMed ID: 23637011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of lexical predictability on distributions of eye fixation durations.
    Staub A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Apr; 18(2):371-6. PubMed ID: 21327339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Distributional effects of word frequency on eye fixation durations.
    Staub A; White SJ; Drieghe D; Hollway EC; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1280-93. PubMed ID: 20873939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The time course of age-of-acquisition effects on eye movements during reading: Evidence from survival analyses.
    Juhasz BJ; Sheridan H
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Jan; 48(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 31278632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The time course of contextual influences during lexical ambiguity resolution: evidence from distributional analyses of fixation durations.
    Sheridan H; Reingold EM
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Oct; 40(7):1122-31. PubMed ID: 22576974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Direct lexical control of eye movements in reading: evidence from a survival analysis of fixation durations.
    Reingold EM; Reichle ED; Glaholt MG; Sheridan H
    Cogn Psychol; 2012 Sep; 65(2):177-206. PubMed ID: 22542804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Individuals' eye movements in reading are highly consistent across time and trial.
    Carter BT; Luke SG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Mar; 44(3):482-492. PubMed ID: 28816481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The distribution of fixation durations during reading: effects of stimulus quality.
    White SJ; Staub A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Jun; 38(3):603-17. PubMed ID: 21910560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Eye-movement models for arithmetic and reading performance.
    Suppes P
    Rev Oculomot Res; 1990; 4():455-77. PubMed ID: 7492535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Literacy skill and intra-individual variability in eye-fixation durations during reading: Evidence from a diverse community-based adult sample.
    Payne BR; Federmeier KD; Stine-Morrow EA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Nov; 73(11):1841-1861. PubMed ID: 32484390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adult age differences in wrap-up during sentence comprehension: evidence from ex-Gaussian distributional analyses of reading time.
    Payne BR; Stine-Morrow EA
    Psychol Aging; 2014 Jun; 29(2):213-28. PubMed ID: 24955990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Morphology of primary visual cortex predicts individual differences in fixation duration during text reading.
    Henderson JM; Choi W; Luke SG
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Dec; 26(12):2880-8. PubMed ID: 24893738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cross-age comparisons reveal multiple strategies for lexical ambiguity resolution during natural reading.
    Stites MC; Federmeier KD; Stine-Morrow EA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1823-41. PubMed ID: 23687920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: word frequency effects and individual differences.
    Schilling HH; Rayner K; Chumbley JI
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Nov; 26(6):1270-81. PubMed ID: 9847550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Children's eye-movements during reading reflect the quality of lexical representations: An individual differences approach.
    Luke SG; Henderson JM; Ferreira F
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1675-83. PubMed ID: 26010825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reading unspaced text: implications for theories of reading eye movements.
    Epelboim J; Booth JR; Steinman RM
    Vision Res; 1994 Jul; 34(13):1735-66. PubMed ID: 7941379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gazepath: An eye-tracking analysis tool that accounts for individual differences and data quality.
    van Renswoude DR; Raijmakers MEJ; Koornneef A; Johnson SP; Hunnius S; Visser I
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Apr; 50(2):834-852. PubMed ID: 28593606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Eye movements during information processing tasks: individual differences and cultural effects.
    Rayner K; Li X; Williams CC; Cave KR; Well AD
    Vision Res; 2007 Sep; 47(21):2714-26. PubMed ID: 17614113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence for direct control of eye movements during reading.
    Dambacher M; Slattery TJ; Yang J; Kliegl R; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Oct; 39(5):1468-84. PubMed ID: 23421473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Eye movements of university students with and without reading difficulties during naming speed tasks.
    Al Dahhan N; Georgiou GK; Hung R; Munoz D; Parrila R; Kirby JR
    Ann Dyslexia; 2014 Jul; 64(2):137-50. PubMed ID: 24723032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.