These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23637059)

  • 21. Do patients with a failed metal-on-metal hip implant with a pseudotumor present differences in their peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations?
    Catelas I; Lehoux EA; Hurda I; Baskey SJ; Gala L; Foster R; Kim PR; Beaulé PE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3903-14. PubMed ID: 26324830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Incidence of Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris From 28-mm Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasties With Minimum 10 Years of Follow-Up: Clinical, Laboratory, and Ultrasound Assessment of 44 Cases.
    Ayoub B; Putman S; Cholewinski P; Paris A; Migaud H; Girard J
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Apr; 32(4):1206-1210. PubMed ID: 27988181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Cobalt/Chromium Ratio Provides Similar Diagnostic Value to a Low Cobalt Threshold in Predicting Adverse Local Tissue Reactions in Patients With Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty.
    Laaksonen I; Galea VP; Donahue GS; Matuszak SJ; Muratoglu O; Malchau H
    J Arthroplasty; 2018 Sep; 33(9):3020-3024. PubMed ID: 29716769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Higher Blood Cobalt and Chromium Levels in Patients With Unilateral Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasties Compared to Hip Resurfacings.
    Lainiala OS; Moilanen TPS; Hart AJ; Huhtala HSA; Sabah SA; Eskelinen AP
    J Arthroplasty; 2016 Jun; 31(6):1261-1266. PubMed ID: 26775067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. High rate of infection after aseptic revision of failed metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.
    Wyles CC; Van Demark RE; Sierra RJ; Trousdale RT
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Feb; 472(2):509-16. PubMed ID: 23846604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Long-term follow-up and metal ion trend of patients with metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.
    Bernstein M; Desy NM; Petit A; Zukor DJ; Huk OL; Antoniou J
    Int Orthop; 2012 Sep; 36(9):1807-12. PubMed ID: 22678122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Adverse reaction to metal debris after ReCap-M2A-Magnum large-diameter-head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.
    Mokka J; Junnila M; Seppänen M; Virolainen P; Pölönen T; Vahlberg T; Mattila K; Tuominen EK; Rantakokko J; Aärimaa V; Kukkonen J; Mäkelä KT
    Acta Orthop; 2013 Dec; 84(6):549-54. PubMed ID: 24171688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Higher Prevalence of Mixed or Solid Pseudotumors in Metal-on-Polyethylene Total Hip Arthroplasty Compared With Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty and Resurfacing Hip Arthroplasty.
    Hjorth MH; Mechlenburg I; Soballe K; Roemer L; Jakobsen SS; Stilling M
    J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jul; 33(7):2279-2286. PubMed ID: 29526334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A Minimum of 15-Year Results of Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a 28-mm Metal-On-Metal Articulation.
    Park CW; Kim JH; Lim SJ; Moon YW; Park YS
    J Arthroplasty; 2019 Jul; 34(7):1387-1394. PubMed ID: 30930158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Adverse reaction to metal debris after Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Junnila M; Seppänen M; Mokka J; Virolainen P; Pölönen T; Vahlberg T; Mattila K; Tuominen EK; Rantakokko J; Äärimaa V; Itälä A; Mäkelä KT
    Acta Orthop; 2015 Jun; 86(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 25582189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Preoperative Risk Factors Associated With Poor Outcomes of Revision Surgery for "Pseudotumors" in Patients With Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty.
    Liow MH; Dimitriou D; Tsai TY; Kwon YM
    J Arthroplasty; 2016 Dec; 31(12):2835-2842. PubMed ID: 27387480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cumulative revision rate is higher in metal-on-metal THA than metal-on-polyethylene THA: analysis of survival in a community registry.
    Huang DC; Tatman P; Mehle S; Gioe TJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Jun; 471(6):1920-5. PubMed ID: 23392990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Correlation between serum metal ion levels and adverse local tissue reactions after Conserve® Plus hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Amstutz HC; Le Duff MJ
    Hip Int; 2017 Jul; 27(4):336-342. PubMed ID: 28165598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A prospective comparative study of hip resurfacing arthroplasty and large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty in younger patients-a minimum of five year follow-up.
    Tao R; Liu F; Liu YK; Lu Y; Xu H; Cao Y; Zhou ZY; Wang W
    Int Orthop; 2018 Oct; 42(10):2323-2327. PubMed ID: 29455347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. High Revision Rate for Large-head Metal-on-metal THA at a Mean of 7.1 Years: A Registry Study.
    Seppänen M; Laaksonen I; Pulkkinen P; Eskelinen A; Puhto AP; Kettunen J; Leskinen J; Manninen M; Mäkelä K
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jun; 476(6):1223-1230. PubMed ID: 29480891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Do ion levels in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing differ from those in metal-on-metal THA at long-term followup?
    Savarino L; Cadossi M; Chiarello E; Baldini N; Giannini S
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Sep; 471(9):2964-71. PubMed ID: 23572350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. What causes unexplained pain in patients with metal-on metal hip devices? A retrieval, histologic, and imaging analysis.
    Nawabi DH; Nassif NA; Do HT; Stoner K; Elpers M; Su EP; Wright T; Potter HG; Padgett DE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Feb; 472(2):543-54. PubMed ID: 23897506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Long-term comparative study of large-diameter metal-on-metal bearings: Resurfacing versus total arthroplasty with large-diameter Durom™ bearing.
    Ridon PE; Putman S; Migaud H; Berton C; Pasquier G; Girard J
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Sep; 105(5):943-948. PubMed ID: 31196833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Adverse reaction to metal debris is more common in patients following MoM total hip replacement with a 36 mm femoral head than previously thought: results from a modern MoM follow-up programme.
    Lainiala O; Eskelinen A; Elo P; Puolakka T; Korhonen J; Moilanen T
    Bone Joint J; 2014 Dec; 96-B(12):1610-7. PubMed ID: 25452362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Poor Survivorship and Frequent Complications at a Median of 10 Years After Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Revision.
    Matharu GS; Pandit HG; Murray DW
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 475(2):304-314. PubMed ID: 27188835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.