187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23637259)
1. Bone remodelling around uncemented metallic and ceramic acetabular components.
Ghosh R; Mukherjee K; Gupta S
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 May; 227(5):490-502. PubMed ID: 23637259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bone remodelling around cementless composite acetabular components: the effects of implant geometry and implant-bone interfacial conditions.
Ghosh R; Gupta S
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Apr; 32():257-269. PubMed ID: 24508712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bone remodelling inside a cemented resurfaced femoral head.
Gupta S; New AM; Taylor M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jul; 21(6):594-602. PubMed ID: 16542761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Loss in mechanical contact of cementless acetabular prostheses due to post-operative weight bearing: a biomechanical model.
Bellini CM; Galbusera F; Ceroni RG; Raimondi MT
Med Eng Phys; 2007 Mar; 29(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 16569508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of primary stability on load transfer and bone remodelling within the uncemented resurfaced femur.
Pal B; Gupta S
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2011 Jun; 225(6):549-61. PubMed ID: 22034739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mechanobiochemical bone remodelling around an uncemented acetabular component: influence of bone orthotropy.
Saviour CM; Mathai B; Gupta S
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2024 Jun; 62(6):1717-1732. PubMed ID: 38353834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A numerical study of failure mechanisms in the cemented resurfaced femur: effects of interface characteristics and bone remodelling.
Pal B; Gupta S; New AM
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 May; 223(4):471-84. PubMed ID: 19499837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bone remodelling of a proximal femur with the thrust plate prosthesis: an in vitro case.
Taylor WR; Ploeg H; Hertig D; Warner MD; Clift SE
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2004 Jun; 7(3):131-7. PubMed ID: 15512756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of musculoskeletal loading regimes on numerical evaluations of acetabular component.
Mukherjee K; Gupta S
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2016 Oct; 230(10):918-29. PubMed ID: 27475907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Numerical Evaluations of an Uncemented Acetabular Component in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Effects of Loading and Interface Conditions.
Saviour CM; Banerjee Chowdhury J; Gupta S
J Biomech Eng; 2023 Feb; 145(2):. PubMed ID: 36149021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of acetabular cup rim design on the contact stress during edge loading in ceramic-on-ceramic hip prostheses.
Mak M; Jin Z; Fisher J; Stewart TD
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Jan; 26(1):131-6. PubMed ID: 20149581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Cementless socket fixation based on the "press-fit" concept in total hip joint arthroplasty].
Morscher EW; Widmer KH; Bereiter H; Elke R; Schenk R
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2002; 69(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 11951572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of interface condition and implant design on bone remodelling and failure risk for the resurfaced femoral head.
Rothstock S; Uhlenbrock A; Bishop N; Laird L; Nassutt R; Morlock M
J Biomech; 2011 Jun; 44(9):1646-53. PubMed ID: 21511258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The potential for bone loss in acetabular structures following THA.
Manley MT; Ong KL; Kurtz SM
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Dec; 453():246-53. PubMed ID: 17006368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Strain adaptive bone remodelling: influence of the implantation technique.
Behrens BA; Bouguecha A; Nolte I; Meyer-Lindenberg A; Stukenborg-Colsman C; Pressel T
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 133():33-44. PubMed ID: 18376011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The possibilities of uncemented glenoid component--a finite element study.
Gupta S; van der Helm FC; van Keulen F
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 Mar; 19(3):292-302. PubMed ID: 15003345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Shape optimization of metal backing for cemented acetabular cup.
Hedia HS; Abdel-Shafi AA; Fouda N
Biomed Mater Eng; 2000; 10(2):73-82. PubMed ID: 11086841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of the change in stem length on the load transfer and bone remodelling for a cemented resurfaced femur.
Pal B; Gupta S; New AM
J Biomech; 2010 Nov; 43(15):2908-14. PubMed ID: 20728891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of material properties of femoral hip components on bone remodeling.
Weinans H; Huiskes R; Grootenboer HJ
J Orthop Res; 1992 Nov; 10(6):845-53. PubMed ID: 1403299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prediction of micromotion initiation of an implanted femur under physiological loads and constraints using the finite element method.
Andreaus U; Colloca M
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 Jul; 223(5):589-605. PubMed ID: 19623912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
