These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23637423)

  • 21. Of course the baby should live: against 'after-birth abortion'.
    Rini RA
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):353-6. PubMed ID: 23637452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Is the pro-choice position for infanticide 'madness'?
    Camosy C
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):301-2. PubMed ID: 23637433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Response to: is the pro-choice position for infanticide 'madness'?
    George RP
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):302. PubMed ID: 23637434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The moral status of babies.
    McGee A
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):345-8. PubMed ID: 23637450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Strange Bedfellows? Common Ground on the Moral Status Question.
    Wilkins SM
    J Med Philos; 2016 Apr; 41(2):130-47. PubMed ID: 26887642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Public distress as a moral consideration in after-birth abortion.
    Biegler P
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):323. PubMed ID: 23637441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Yes, the baby should live: a pro-choice response to Giubilini and Minerva.
    Manninen BA
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):330-5. PubMed ID: 23637447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Ethical problems of abortion.
    Bok S
    Stud Hastings Cent; 1974 Jan; 2(1):33-52. PubMed ID: 11661052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. 'After-birth abortion' and arguments from potential.
    Oakley J
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):324-5. PubMed ID: 23637444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The moral significance of being born.
    Levy N
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):326-9. PubMed ID: 23637446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Pro-Life Arguments Against Infanticide and Why they are Not Convincing.
    Räsänen J
    Bioethics; 2016 Nov; 30(9):656-662. PubMed ID: 27717058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Some comments on the paper 'after-birth abortion: why should the baby live?'.
    Kuhse H
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):323-4. PubMed ID: 23637442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. After-birth abortion.
    Selgelid MJ
    Monash Bioeth Rev; 2012 Mar; 30(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 22924237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Abortion and infanticide: is there a difference?
    Cannon D
    Policy Rev; 1985; No. 32():12-7. PubMed ID: 11655683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The importance of rationality.
    Schaefer GO
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2013; 43(1):3-4; discussion 6-7. PubMed ID: 23315839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Limitations on personhood arguments for abortion and 'after-birth abortion'.
    Wrigley A
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):e15-8. PubMed ID: 23637455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Killing fetuses and killing newborns.
    Di Nucci E
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):e19-20. PubMed ID: 23637456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reasons and freedom.
    Giubilini A; Minerva F
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2013; 43(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 23315841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The arguments matter.
    Marquis D
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2013; 43(1):3; discussion 5-7. PubMed ID: 23315840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Abortion and the golden rule.
    Hare RM
    Philos Public Aff; 1975; 4(3):201-22. PubMed ID: 11661183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.