These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23637449)
81. Sandra Day O'Connor and the justification of abortion. Werhane PH Theor Med; 1984 Oct; 5(3):359-63. PubMed ID: 11644178 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
82. Abortion: the moral status of the unborn. Werner R Soc Theory Pract; 1974; 3(2):201-22. PubMed ID: 11663640 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
83. Human being: the boundaries of the concept. Becker LC Philos Public Aff; 1975; 4(2):334-59. PubMed ID: 11663649 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
84. Reinterpreting the 'quickening' perspective in the abortion debate. Sekaleshfar FB Theor Med Bioeth; 2009; 30(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 19301145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
85. An almost absolute value in history. Noonan JT Hum Life Rev; 1985; 11(1-2):125-78. PubMed ID: 11658576 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
86. Must we have full moral status throughout our existence? A reply to Alfonso Gómez-Lobo. DeGrazia D Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2007 Dec; 17(4):297-310; discussion 311-20. PubMed ID: 18363268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
87. A study in the morality of abortion. Thompson RP Crux; 1974; 12(4):9-21. PubMed ID: 11663742 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
88. Medical ethics and the potentialities of the living being. Holbrook D Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Aug; 291(6493):459-62. PubMed ID: 3926237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
89. What philosophy of mind can tell us about the morality of abortion: personhood, materialism, and the existence of self. Himma KE Int J Appl Philos; 2003; 17(1):89-109. PubMed ID: 15040350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
90. If fetuses are persons, abortion is a public health crisis. Blackshaw B; Rodger D Bioethics; 2021 Jun; 35(5):465-472. PubMed ID: 33811355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
91. Human equality arguments against abortion. Miller C J Med Ethics; 2023 Aug; 49(8):569-572. PubMed ID: 36384892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
92. Should UK law reconsider the initial threshold of legal personality? A critical analysis. Nixon DJ Hum Reprod Genet Ethics; 2010; 16(2):182-217. PubMed ID: 22533035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
93. When does a person begin? Baker LR Soc Philos Policy; 2005; 22(2):25-48. PubMed ID: 16363084 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
94. The performativity of personhood. Mills C Monash Bioeth Rev; 2012 Mar; 30(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 22924242 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
95. The Ethics of Killing: Strengthening the Substance View with Time-relative Interests. Blackshaw BP New Bioeth; 2019 Dec; 25(4):332-348. PubMed ID: 31596189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
96. Viability, abortion, and the difference between a fetus and an infant. Engelhardt HT Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1973 Jun; 116(3):429-34. PubMed ID: 4707545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
97. Why the nuclear option? Supporting pregnant women without new categories of moral status. Rea JB J Med Ethics; 2023 Dec; 50(1):20-21. PubMed ID: 37845012 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
98. Infanticide for handicapped infants: sometimes it's a metaphysical dispute. Long TA J Med Ethics; 1988 Jun; 14(2):79-81. PubMed ID: 2969052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
99. Moral status of the fetus and the permissibility of abortion: a contractarian response to Thomson's violinist thought experiment. Minehan MJ J Med Ethics; 2022 Jun; 48(6):407-410. PubMed ID: 33963066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]