BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23637450)

  • 1. The moral status of babies.
    McGee A
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):345-8. PubMed ID: 23637450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Yes, the baby should live: a pro-choice response to Giubilini and Minerva.
    Manninen BA
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):330-5. PubMed ID: 23637447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Of course the baby should live: against 'after-birth abortion'.
    Rini RA
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):353-6. PubMed ID: 23637452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Personhood, harm and interest: a reply to Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva.
    Beard M; Lynch S
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):e1-4. PubMed ID: 23637453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Abortion, infanticide and moral context.
    Porter L
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):350-2. PubMed ID: 23637451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Potentials and burdens: a reply to Giubilini and Minerva.
    Beckwith FJ
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):341-4. PubMed ID: 23637449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Why should the baby live? Human right to life and the precautionary principle.
    Rocchi B
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):e6-e10. PubMed ID: 23637458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pro-Life Arguments Against Infanticide and Why they are Not Convincing.
    Räsänen J
    Bioethics; 2016 Nov; 30(9):656-662. PubMed ID: 27717058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Killing fetuses and killing newborns.
    Di Nucci E
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):e19-20. PubMed ID: 23637456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The moral significance of being born.
    Levy N
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):326-9. PubMed ID: 23637446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Concern for our vulnerable prenatal and neonatal children: a brief reply to Giubilini and Minerva.
    Camosy C
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):296-8. PubMed ID: 23637431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 'After-birth abortion' and arguments from potential.
    Oakley J
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):324-5. PubMed ID: 23637444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Abortion, infanticide and allowing babies to die, 40 years on.
    Savulescu J
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):257-9. PubMed ID: 23637422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. After-birth abortion: the intuition argument.
    Lederman Z
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):e5. PubMed ID: 23637457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Infanticide and madness.
    George RP
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):299-301. PubMed ID: 23637432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Limitations on personhood arguments for abortion and 'after-birth abortion'.
    Wrigley A
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):e15-8. PubMed ID: 23637455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Some comments on the paper 'after-birth abortion: why should the baby live?'.
    Kuhse H
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):323-4. PubMed ID: 23637442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Response to: is the pro-choice position for infanticide 'madness'?
    George RP
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):302. PubMed ID: 23637434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?
    Giubilini A; Minerva F
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):261-3. PubMed ID: 22361296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Public distress as a moral consideration in after-birth abortion.
    Biegler P
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):323. PubMed ID: 23637441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.