182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23637458)
1. Why should the baby live? Human right to life and the precautionary principle.
Rocchi B
J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):e6-e10. PubMed ID: 23637458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The moral status of babies.
McGee A
J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):345-8. PubMed ID: 23637450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Yes, the baby should live: a pro-choice response to Giubilini and Minerva.
Manninen BA
J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):330-5. PubMed ID: 23637447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Abortion, infanticide and moral context.
Porter L
J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):350-2. PubMed ID: 23637451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Potentials and burdens: a reply to Giubilini and Minerva.
Beckwith FJ
J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):341-4. PubMed ID: 23637449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Of course the baby should live: against 'after-birth abortion'.
Rini RA
J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):353-6. PubMed ID: 23637452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Killing fetuses and killing newborns.
Di Nucci E
J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):e19-20. PubMed ID: 23637456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Personhood, harm and interest: a reply to Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva.
Beard M; Lynch S
J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):e1-4. PubMed ID: 23637453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Capacity, harm and experience in the life of persons as equals.
Finnis J
J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):281-3. PubMed ID: 23637427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?
Giubilini A; Minerva F
J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):261-3. PubMed ID: 22361296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The moral significance of being born.
Levy N
J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):326-9. PubMed ID: 23637446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Some comments on the paper 'after-birth abortion: why should the baby live?'.
Kuhse H
J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):323-4. PubMed ID: 23637442
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Pro-Life Arguments Against Infanticide and Why they are Not Convincing.
Räsänen J
Bioethics; 2016 Nov; 30(9):656-662. PubMed ID: 27717058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. After-birth abortion: the intuition argument.
Lederman Z
J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):e5. PubMed ID: 23637457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Concern for our vulnerable prenatal and neonatal children: a brief reply to Giubilini and Minerva.
Camosy C
J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):296-8. PubMed ID: 23637431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 'After-birth abortion' and arguments from potential.
Oakley J
J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):324-5. PubMed ID: 23637444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. After-birth and before-birth personhood: why the baby should live.
Knoepffler NJ; O'Malley MJ
J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):e11-4. PubMed ID: 23637454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Viable Violinist.
Hawking M
Bioethics; 2016 Jun; 30(5):312-6. PubMed ID: 26423668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Limitations on personhood arguments for abortion and 'after-birth abortion'.
Wrigley A
J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):e15-8. PubMed ID: 23637455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Public distress as a moral consideration in after-birth abortion.
Biegler P
J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):323. PubMed ID: 23637441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
