263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23637993)
1. Local mechanical stimuli regulate bone formation and resorption in mice at the tissue level.
Schulte FA; Ruffoni D; Lambers FM; Christen D; Webster DJ; Kuhn G; Müller R
PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e62172. PubMed ID: 23637993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vivo micro-computed tomography allows direct three-dimensional quantification of both bone formation and bone resorption parameters using time-lapsed imaging.
Schulte FA; Lambers FM; Kuhn G; Müller R
Bone; 2011 Mar; 48(3):433-42. PubMed ID: 20950723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Precision of bone mechanoregulation assessment in humans using longitudinal high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography in vivo.
Walle M; Whittier DE; Schenk D; Atkins PR; Blauth M; Zysset P; Lippuner K; Müller R; Collins CJ
Bone; 2023 Jul; 172():116780. PubMed ID: 37137459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bone remodeling and responsiveness to mechanical stimuli in individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus.
Walle M; Duseja A; Whittier DE; Vilaca T; Paggiosi M; Eastell R; Müller R; Collins CJ
J Bone Miner Res; 2024 Mar; 39(2):85-94. PubMed ID: 38477745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mouse tail vertebrae adapt to cyclic mechanical loading by increasing bone formation rate and decreasing bone resorption rate as shown by time-lapsed in vivo imaging of dynamic bone morphometry.
Lambers FM; Schulte FA; Kuhn G; Webster DJ; Müller R
Bone; 2011 Dec; 49(6):1340-50. PubMed ID: 21964411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vivo Visualisation and Quantification of Bone Resorption and Bone Formation from Time-Lapse Imaging.
Christen P; Müller R
Curr Osteoporos Rep; 2017 Aug; 15(4):311-317. PubMed ID: 28639146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Aging Leads to a Dysregulation in Mechanically Driven Bone Formation and Resorption.
Razi H; Birkhold AI; Weinkamer R; Duda GN; Willie BM; Checa S
J Bone Miner Res; 2015 Oct; 30(10):1864-73. PubMed ID: 25857303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mineralizing surface is the main target of mechanical stimulation independent of age: 3D dynamic in vivo morphometry.
Birkhold AI; Razi H; Duda GN; Weinkamer R; Checa S; Willie BM
Bone; 2014 Sep; 66():15-25. PubMed ID: 24882735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A novel algorithm to predict bone changes in the mouse tibia properties under physiological conditions.
Cheong VS; Campos Marin A; Lacroix D; Dall'Ara E
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2020 Jun; 19(3):985-1001. PubMed ID: 31786678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tomography-Based Quantification of Regional Differences in Cortical Bone Surface Remodeling and Mechano-Response.
Birkhold AI; Razi H; Duda GN; Checa S; Willie BM
Calcif Tissue Int; 2017 Mar; 100(3):255-270. PubMed ID: 27999894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mechanoregulation analysis of bone formation in tissue engineered constructs requires a volumetric method using time-lapsed micro-computed tomography.
Griesbach JK; Schulte FA; Schädli GN; Rubert M; Müller R
Acta Biomater; 2024 Apr; 179():149-163. PubMed ID: 38492908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vivo monitoring of bone architecture and remodeling after implant insertion: The different responses of cortical and trabecular bone.
Li Z; Kuhn G; von Salis-Soglio M; Cooke SJ; Schirmer M; Müller R; Ruffoni D
Bone; 2015 Dec; 81():468-477. PubMed ID: 26303288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bone adaptation to cyclic loading in murine caudal vertebrae is maintained with age and directly correlated to the local micromechanical environment.
Lambers FM; Kuhn G; Weigt C; Koch KM; Schulte FA; Müller R
J Biomech; 2015 Apr; 48(6):1179-87. PubMed ID: 25543278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of age on adaptive bone formation and bone resorption.
Birkhold AI; Razi H; Duda GN; Weinkamer R; Checa S; Willie BM
Biomaterials; 2014 Nov; 35(34):9290-301. PubMed ID: 25128376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vivo loading increases mechanical properties of scaffold by affecting bone formation and bone resorption rates.
Roshan-Ghias A; Lambers FM; Gholam-Rezaee M; Müller R; Pioletti DP
Bone; 2011 Dec; 49(6):1357-64. PubMed ID: 21958844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A semi-empirical cell dynamics model for bone turnover under external stimulus.
Carew EO
J Biomech Eng; 2012 Feb; 134(2):024503. PubMed ID: 22482678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Additional weight bearing during exercise and estrogen in the rat: the effect on bone mass, turnover, and structure.
Tromp AM; Bravenboer N; Tanck E; Oostlander A; Holzmann PJ; Kostense PJ; Roos JC; Burger EH; Huiskes R; Lips P
Calcif Tissue Int; 2006 Dec; 79(6):404-15. PubMed ID: 17160577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Longitudinal in vivo imaging of bone formation and resorption using fluorescence molecular tomography.
Lambers FM; Stuker F; Weigt C; Kuhn G; Koch K; Schulte FA; Ripoll J; Rudin M; Müller R
Bone; 2013 Feb; 52(2):587-95. PubMed ID: 23142804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Piezoelectricity could predict sites of formation/resorption in bone remodelling and modelling.
Fernández JR; García-Aznar JM; Martínez R
J Theor Biol; 2012 Jan; 292():86-92. PubMed ID: 22001080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Trabecular bone remodeling: an experimental model.
Goldstein SA; Matthews LS; Kuhn JL; Hollister SJ
J Biomech; 1991; 24 Suppl 1():135-50. PubMed ID: 1791174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
