These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Influence of Thermal Cycling on Flexural Properties and Simulated Wear of Computer-aided Design/Computer-aided Manufacturing Resin Composites. Tsujimoto A; Barkmeier WW; Takamizawa T; Latta MA; Miyazaki M Oper Dent; 2017; 42(1):101-110. PubMed ID: 27802120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of shade and storage time on the flexural strength, flexural modulus, and hardness of composites used for indirect restorations. Cesar PF; Miranda WG; Braga RR J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 11552166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Flow, strength, stiffness and radiopacity of flowable resin composites. Attar N; Tam LE; McComb D J Can Dent Assoc; 2003 Sep; 69(8):516-21. PubMed ID: 12954140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Flexural Strength and Wear of Injectable, Flowable and Paste Composite Resins. Rajabi H; Denny M; Karagiannopoulos K; Petridis H Materials (Basel); 2024 Sep; 17(19):. PubMed ID: 39410319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Flexural properties of eight flowable light-cured restorative materials, in immediate vs 24-hour water storage. Tjandrawinata R; Irie M; Suzuki K Oper Dent; 2005; 30(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 15853111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Properties of a dental resin composite with a spherical inorganic filler. Lu H; Lee YK; Oguri M; Powers JM Oper Dent; 2006; 31(6):734-40. PubMed ID: 17153985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Are resin composites suitable replacements for amalgam? A study of two-body wear. Lazaridou D; Belli R; Petschelt A; Lohbauer U Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Jul; 19(6):1485-92. PubMed ID: 25491442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Polymerization Behavior and Mechanical Properties of High-Viscosity Bulk Fill and Low Shrinkage Resin Composites. Shibasaki S; Takamizawa T; Nojiri K; Imai A; Tsujimoto A; Endo H; Suzuki S; Suda S; Barkmeier WW; Latta MA; Miyazaki M Oper Dent; 2017; 42(6):E177-E187. PubMed ID: 28976846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro wear resistance of conventional and flowable composites containing various filler types after thermomechanical loading. Turk S; Erden Kayalidere E; Celik EU; Yasa B J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 Apr; 36(4):643-651. PubMed ID: 37723851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of resin-based material combination on the compressive and the flexural strength. Gömeç Y; Dörter C; Dabanoglu A; Koray F J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Feb; 32(2):122-7. PubMed ID: 15641978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro wear of flowable resin composite for posterior restorations. Shinkai K; Taira Y; Suzuki S; Suzuki M Dent Mater J; 2016; 35(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 26843441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differences in color, translucency and fluorescence between flowable and universal resin composites. Yu B; Lee YK J Dent; 2008 Oct; 36(10):840-6. PubMed ID: 18621459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of fiber aspect ratio and volume loading on the flexural properties of flowable dental composite. Shouha P; Swain M; Ellakwa A Dent Mater; 2014 Nov; 30(11):1234-44. PubMed ID: 25236331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]