These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

57 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2363984)

  • 1. [Design and preliminary application of the minimal auditory capabilities in Chinese people].
    Zhang H
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1990; 25(2):79-82, 126. PubMed ID: 2363984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Audiological application criteria for implantable hearing aid devices: a clinical experience at the Nijmegen ORL clinic.
    Verhaegen VJ; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW; Snik AF
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Sep; 118(9):1645-9. PubMed ID: 18677283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. BAHA in children and adolescents with unilateral or bilateral conductive hearing loss: a study of outcome.
    Priwin C; Jönsson R; Hultcrantz M; Granström G
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Jan; 71(1):135-45. PubMed ID: 17092570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cochlear implantation outcome in prelingually deafened young adults. A speech perception study.
    Santarelli R; De Filippi R; Genovese E; Arslan E
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 18259078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Some implications of audiological measures in the population for binaural aiding strategies.
    Davis AC; Haggard MP
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 15():167-79. PubMed ID: 6955924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Auditory and corporal laterality, logoaudiometry, and monaural hearing aid gain].
    Benavides M; Peñaloza-López YR; de la Sancha-Jiménez S; García Pedroza F; Gudiño PK
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2007 Dec; 58(10):458-63. PubMed ID: 18082075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Audiological results with the cochlear implant.
    Thielemeir MA; Brimacombe JA; Eisenberg LS
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1982; 91(2 Pt 3):27-34. PubMed ID: 6805394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bilateral bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHAs): an audiometric evaluation.
    Priwin C; Stenfelt S; Granström G; Tjellström A; Håkansson B
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Jan; 114(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 14709999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reactions to binaural hearing aid fitting.
    Markides A
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 15():197-205. PubMed ID: 6955926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Review of audiometric criteria in treatment of neurosensorial deafness with hearing aids and implantable hearing devices].
    Manrique M; Valdivieso A; Ruba D; Gimeno-Vilar C; Montes-Jovellar L; Manrique R
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2008 Jan; 59(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 18215387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
    Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Perception of acoustic speech features with single channel cochlear implants and hearing aids. A comparative analysis].
    Dillier N; Spillmann T
    HNO; 1988 Aug; 36(8):335-41. PubMed ID: 3170279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users.
    Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):421-34. PubMed ID: 18344870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An evaluation of speech audiometry by bone conduction in hearing-impaired adults.
    Karlsen EA; Goetzinger CP
    J Aud Res; 1980 Apr; 20(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 7345063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Children's speech recognition scores: the Speech Intelligibility Index and proficiency factors for age and hearing level.
    Scollie SD
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):543-56. PubMed ID: 18469717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Communicative ability in an audiological perspective. Theory and application to post-secondary school students.
    Borg E; Samuelsson E; Danermark B; Rönnberg J
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1999; 50():i-iv, 1-36. PubMed ID: 10810771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An influence of binaural hearing aids on positioning of sound images.
    Nábĕlek AK; Letowski T; Mason D
    J Speech Hear Res; 1980 Sep; 23(3):670-87. PubMed ID: 7421165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.