101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23640114)
1. Probabilistic objective functions for margin-less IMRT planning.
Bohoslavsky R; Witte MG; Janssen TM; van Herk M
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Jun; 58(11):3563-80. PubMed ID: 23640114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. IMRT optimization including random and systematic geometric errors based on the expectation of TCP and NTCP.
Witte MG; van der Geer J; Schneider C; Lebesque JV; Alber M; van Herk M
Med Phys; 2007 Sep; 34(9):3544-55. PubMed ID: 17926957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Volumetric modulated arc therapy: planning and evaluation for prostate cancer cases.
Zhang P; Happersett L; Hunt M; Jackson A; Zelefsky M; Mageras G
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Apr; 76(5):1456-62. PubMed ID: 19540062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Lee EK; Fox T; Crocker I
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):301-20. PubMed ID: 16289912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Strategy for online correction of rotational organ motion for intensity-modulated radiotherapy of prostate cancer.
Rijkhorst EJ; van Herk M; Lebesque JV; Sonke JJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Dec; 69(5):1608-17. PubMed ID: 17919845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A knowledge-based approach to improving and homogenizing intensity modulated radiation therapy planning quality among treatment centers: an example application to prostate cancer planning.
Good D; Lo J; Lee WR; Wu QJ; Yin FF; Das SK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Sep; 87(1):176-81. PubMed ID: 23623460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Under conditions of large geometric miss, tumor control probability can be higher for static gantry intensity-modulated radiation therapy compared to volume-modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer.
Balderson M; Brown D; Johnson P; Kirkby C
Med Dosim; 2016; 41(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 27067229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparisons of treatment optimization directly incorporating random patient setup uncertainty with a margin-based approach.
Moore JA; Gordon JJ; Anscher MS; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2009 Sep; 36(9):3880-90. PubMed ID: 19810460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Experience-based quality control of clinical intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning.
Moore KL; Brame RS; Low DA; Mutic S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Oct; 81(2):545-51. PubMed ID: 21277097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dealing with geometric uncertainties in dose painting by numbers: introducing the ΔVH.
Witte M; Shakirin G; Houweling A; Peulen H; van Herk M
Radiother Oncol; 2011 Sep; 100(3):402-6. PubMed ID: 21937139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Experimental evaluation of a robust optimization method for IMRT of moving targets.
Vrancić C; Trofimov A; Chan TC; Sharp GC; Bortfeld T
Phys Med Biol; 2009 May; 54(9):2901-14. PubMed ID: 19384003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Uncertainty reduction in intensity modulated proton therapy by inverse Monte Carlo treatment planning.
Morávek Z; Rickhey M; Hartmann M; Bogner L
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4803-19. PubMed ID: 19622848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robust treatment planning with conditional value at risk chance constraints in intensity-modulated proton therapy.
An Y; Liang J; Schild SE; Bues M; Liu W
Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 44(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 28044325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A treatment planning and acute toxicity comparison of two pelvic nodal volume delineation techniques and delivery comparison of intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus volumetric modulated arc therapy for hypofractionated high-risk prostate cancer radiotherapy.
Myrehaug S; Chan G; Craig T; Weinberg V; Cheng C; Roach M; Cheung P; Sahgal A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Mar; 82(4):e657-62. PubMed ID: 22245189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A VMAT planning solution for prostate patients using a commercial treatment planning system.
Boylan CJ; Golby C; Rowbottom CG
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jul; 55(14):N395-404. PubMed ID: 20601771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of spatial dose gradients and probability density function to evaluate the effect of internal organ motion for prostate IMRT treatment planning.
Jiang R; Barnett RB; Chow JC; Chen JZ
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1469-84. PubMed ID: 17301465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Application of dose compensation in image-guided radiotherapy of prostate cancer.
Wu Q; Liang J; Yan D
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1405-19. PubMed ID: 16510952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intensity modulation under geometrical uncertainty: a deconvolution approach to robust fluence.
Fan Y; Nath R
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jul; 55(14):4029-45. PubMed ID: 20601776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of patient setup errors on simultaneously integrated boost head and neck IMRT treatment plans.
Siebers JV; Keall PJ; Wu Q; Williamson JF; Schmidt-Ullrich RK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):422-33. PubMed ID: 16168835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
