184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23640293)
1. Interobserver variability of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging in cervical cancer.
Tummers P; Gerestein K; Mens JW; Verstraelen H; van Doorn H
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jun; 23(5):890-4. PubMed ID: 23640293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computed tomography in staging primary uterine cervical carcinoma.
Poon PY
J Can Assoc Radiol; 1983 Jun; 34(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 6885893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prognostic Performance of the 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Cervical Cancer Staging Guidelines.
Wright JD; Matsuo K; Huang Y; Tergas AI; Hou JY; Khoury-Collado F; St Clair CM; Ananth CV; Neugut AI; Hershman DL
Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jul; 134(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 31188324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interobserver agreement of transvaginal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in local staging of cervical cancer.
Pálsdóttir K; Fridsten S; Blomqvist L; Alagic Z; Fischerova D; Gaurilcikas A; Hasselrot K; Jäderling F; Testa AC; Sundin A; Epstein E
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 58(5):773-779. PubMed ID: 33915001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interobserver agreement and prognostic impact for MRI-based 2018 FIGO staging parameters in uterine cervical cancer.
Wagner-Larsen KS; Lura N; Salvesen Ø; Halle MK; Forsse D; Trovik J; Smit N; Krakstad C; Haldorsen IS
Eur Radiol; 2022 Sep; 32(9):6444-6455. PubMed ID: 35332408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Parametrial involvement in FIGO stage IB1 cervical carcinoma diagnostic impact of tumor diameter in preoperative magnetic resonance imaging.
Kamimori T; Sakamoto K; Fujiwara K; Umayahara K; Sugiyama Y; Utsugi K; Takeshima N; Tanaka H; Gomi N; Takizawa K
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 Feb; 21(2):349-54. PubMed ID: 21721193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Predictive Model for Parametrial Invasion in Patients With FIGO Stage IB Cervical Cancer: Individualized Approach for Primary Treatment.
Kong TW; Piao X; Chang SJ; Paek J; Lee Y; Lee EJ; Ryu HS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Jan; 26(1):184-91. PubMed ID: 26512782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lacunae in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classification for cervical carcinoma: observational study using TNM classification as comparator.
Meva J; Chaudhary RK; Bhaduri D; Bhatia M; Hatti S; Ba R
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jul; 23(6):1071-7. PubMed ID: 23792602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of Parametrial Response by Growth Pattern in Patients With International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage IIB and IIIB Cervical Cancer: Analysis of Patients From a Prospective, Multicenter Trial (EMBRACE).
Yoshida K; Jastaniyah N; Sturdza A; Lindegaard J; Segedin B; Mahantshetty U; Rai B; Jürgenliemk-Schulz I; Haie-Meder C; Sasaki R; Pötter R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Nov; 93(4):788-96. PubMed ID: 26530747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of the effect of adjuvant radiotherapy on outcomes and complications after radical hysterectomy in FIGO stage IB1 cervical cancer patients with intermediate risk factors (GOTIC Study).
Nakamura K; Kitahara Y; Satoh T; Takei Y; Takano M; Nagao S; Sekiguchi I; Suzuki M
World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Jun; 14(1):173. PubMed ID: 27356862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perioperative morbidity and rate of upstaging after laparoscopic staging for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: results of a prospective randomized trial.
Köhler C; Mustea A; Marnitz S; Schneider A; Chiantera V; Ulrich U; Scharf JP; Martus P; Vieira MA; Tsunoda A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 213(4):503.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25986030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Safe criteria for less radical trachelectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a multicenter clinicopathologic study.
Kim HS; Choi CH; Lim MC; Chang SJ; Kim YB; Kim MA; Kim TJ; Park SY; Kim BG; Song YS; Bae DS; Kim JW
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jun; 19(6):1973-9. PubMed ID: 22183162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A reappraisal of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for cervical cancer. A study of patterns of care.
Lanciano RM; Won M; Hanks GE
Cancer; 1992 Jan; 69(2):482-7. PubMed ID: 1728378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in pretreatment evaluation of early-stage cervical cancer.
Zhang W; Zhang J; Yang J; Xue H; Cao D; Huang H; Wu M; Cui Q; Chen J; Lang J; Shen K
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Sep; 24(7):1292-8. PubMed ID: 24987919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of international federation of gynecology and obstetrics stage IB cervical cancer: comparison of diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T.
Lin Y; Chen Z; Kuang F; Li H; Zhong Q; Ma M
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(6):989-94. PubMed ID: 24270123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcome of international Federation of gynecology and obstetrics stage IIb cervical cancer from 2003 to 2012: an evaluation of treatments and prognosis: a retrospective study.
Guo L; Liu X; Wang L; Sun H; Huang K; Li X; Tang F; Li S; Yuan X; Wang C
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Jun; 25(5):910-8. PubMed ID: 25867278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimally invasive surgical management of early-stage cervical cancer: an analysis of the risk factors of surgical complications and of oncologic outcomes.
Garabedian C; Merlot B; Bresson L; Tresch E; Narducci F; Leblanc E
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 May; 25(4):714-21. PubMed ID: 25647258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Do FIGO stage IA and small (≤2 cm) IB1 cervical adenocarcinomas have a good prognosis and warrant less radical surgery?
Al-Kalbani M; McVeigh G; Nagar H; McCluggage WG
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Feb; 22(2):291-5. PubMed ID: 22080884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Role of imaging in pretreatment evaluation of early invasive cervical cancer: results of the intergroup study American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6651-Gynecologic Oncology Group 183.
Hricak H; Gatsonis C; Chi DS; Amendola MA; Brandt K; Schwartz LH; Koelliker S; Siegelman ES; Brown JJ; McGhee RB; Iyer R; Vitellas KM; Snyder B; Long HJ; Fiorica JV; Mitchell DG; ;
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Dec; 23(36):9329-37. PubMed ID: 16361632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of Surgical Versus Clinical Staging in Chemoradiated FIGO Stage IIB-IVA Cervical Cancer Patients-Acute Toxicity and Treatment Quality of the Uterus-11 Multicenter Phase III Intergroup Trial of the German Radiation Oncology Group and the Gynecologic Cancer Group.
Marnitz S; Martus P; Köhler C; Stromberger C; Asse E; Mallmann P; Schmidberger H; Affonso Júnior RJ; Nunes JS; Sehouli J; Budach V
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 Feb; 94(2):243-53. PubMed ID: 26853333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
