These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

402 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23640517)

  • 21. Simultaneous fitting of genomic-BLUP and Bayes-C components in a genomic prediction model.
    Iheshiulor OOM; Woolliams JA; Svendsen M; Solberg T; Meuwissen THE
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Aug; 49(1):63. PubMed ID: 28836944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Genomic prediction of genetic merit using LD-based haplotypes in the Nordic Holstein population.
    Cuyabano BC; Su G; Lund MS
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Dec; 15(1):1171. PubMed ID: 25539631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accuracy of prediction of simulated polygenic phenotypes and their underlying quantitative trait loci genotypes using real or imputed whole-genome markers in cattle.
    Hassani S; Saatchi M; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():99. PubMed ID: 26698091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A two-stage approximation for analysis of mixture genetic models in large pedigrees.
    Habier D; Totir LR; Fernando RL
    Genetics; 2010 Jun; 185(2):655-70. PubMed ID: 20382829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Random forest estimation of genomic breeding values for disease susceptibility over different disease incidences and genomic architectures in simulated cow calibration groups.
    Naderi S; Yin T; König S
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Sep; 99(9):7261-7273. PubMed ID: 27344385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The importance of identity-by-state information for the accuracy of genomic selection.
    Luan T; Woolliams JA; Odegård J; Dolezal M; Roman-Ponce SI; Bagnato A; Meuwissen TH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Aug; 44(1):28. PubMed ID: 22937985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Genome-wide prediction of traits with different genetic architecture through efficient variable selection.
    Wimmer V; Lehermeier C; Albrecht T; Auinger HJ; Wang Y; Schön CC
    Genetics; 2013 Oct; 195(2):573-87. PubMed ID: 23934883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Using selection index theory to estimate consistency of multi-locus linkage disequilibrium across populations.
    Wientjes YC; Veerkamp RF; Calus MP
    BMC Genet; 2015 Jul; 16():87. PubMed ID: 26187501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Parameters affecting genome simulation for evaluating genomic selection method.
    Nishio M; Satoh M
    Anim Sci J; 2014 Oct; 85(10):879-87. PubMed ID: 24841444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix.
    Hayes BJ; Visscher PM; Goddard ME
    Genet Res (Camb); 2009 Feb; 91(1):47-60. PubMed ID: 19220931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Genotype Imputation to Improve the Cost-Efficiency of Genomic Selection in Rabbits.
    Mancin E; Sosa-Madrid BS; Blasco A; Ibáñez-Escriche N
    Animals (Basel); 2021 Mar; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 33805619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Long-term impacts of genome-enabled selection.
    Long N; Gianola D; Rosa GJ; Weigel KA
    J Appl Genet; 2011 Nov; 52(4):467-80. PubMed ID: 21584728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Using genomic selection to improve the accuracy of genomic prediction for multi-populations in pigs.
    Yin C; Zhou P; Wang Y; Yin Z; Liu Y
    Animal; 2024 Feb; 18(2):101062. PubMed ID: 38211414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Genomic predictions in purebreds with a multibreed genomic relationship matrix1.
    Steyn Y; Lourenco DAL; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Nov; 97(11):4418-4427. PubMed ID: 31539424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Breeding value estimation for fat percentage using dense markers on Bos taurus autosome 14.
    de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Mullaart E; Calus MP; Veerkamp RF
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Oct; 90(10):4821-9. PubMed ID: 17881705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Weighted single-step genomic BLUP improves accuracy of genomic breeding values for protein content in French dairy goats: a quantitative trait influenced by a major gene.
    Teissier M; Larroque H; Robert-Granié C
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Jun; 50(1):31. PubMed ID: 29907084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Genomic best linear unbiased prediction method reflecting the degree of linkage disequilibrium.
    Nishio M; Satoh M
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2015 Oct; 132(5):357-65. PubMed ID: 25866073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Genome-wide association study and prediction of genomic breeding values for fatty-acid composition in Korean Hanwoo cattle using a high-density single-nucleotide polymorphism array.
    Bhuiyan MSA; Kim YK; Kim HJ; Lee DH; Lee SH; Yoon HB; Lee SH
    J Anim Sci; 2018 Sep; 96(10):4063-4075. PubMed ID: 30265318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The importance of information on relatives for the prediction of genomic breeding values and the implications for the makeup of reference data sets in livestock breeding schemes.
    Clark SA; Hickey JM; Daetwyler HD; van der Werf JH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Feb; 44(1):4. PubMed ID: 22321529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An efficient unified model for genome-wide association studies and genomic selection.
    Li H; Su G; Jiang L; Bao Z
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Aug; 49(1):64. PubMed ID: 28836943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.