BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23643603)

  • 1. Pathological outcomes in men with low risk and very low risk prostate cancer: implications on the practice of active surveillance.
    Tosoian JJ; JohnBull E; Trock BJ; Landis P; Epstein JI; Partin AW; Walsh PC; Carter HB
    J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4):1218-22. PubMed ID: 23643603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. National Comprehensive Cancer Network® Favorable Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer-Is Active Surveillance Appropriate?
    Aghazadeh MA; Frankel J; Belanger M; McLaughlin T; Tortora J; Staff I; Wagner JR
    J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1196-1201. PubMed ID: 29288120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adverse Pathologic Findings for Men Electing Immediate Radical Prostatectomy: Defining a Favorable Intermediate-Risk Group.
    Patel HD; Tosoian JJ; Carter HB; Epstein JI
    JAMA Oncol; 2018 Jan; 4(1):89-92. PubMed ID: 28715578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Pathological and Oncologic Outcomes of Favorable Risk Gleason Score 3 + 4 and Low Risk Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer: Considerations for Active Surveillance.
    Gearman DJ; Morlacco A; Cheville JC; Rangel LJ; Karnes RJ
    J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1188-1195. PubMed ID: 29225057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Limitations in Predicting Organ Confined Prostate Cancer in Patients with Gleason Pattern 4 on Biopsy: Implications for Active Surveillance.
    Perlis N; Sayyid R; Evans A; Van Der Kwast T; Toi A; Finelli A; Kulkarni G; Hamilton R; Zlotta AR; Trachtenberg J; Ghai S; Fleshner NE
    J Urol; 2017 Jan; 197(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 27457260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tumor Volume on Biopsy of Low Risk Prostate Cancer Managed with Active Surveillance.
    Tosoian JJ; Mamawala M; Patel HD; Alam R; Epstein JI; Ross AE; Carter HB
    J Urol; 2018 Apr; 199(4):954-960. PubMed ID: 29074222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Expanded criteria to identify men eligible for active surveillance of low risk prostate cancer at Johns Hopkins: a preliminary analysis.
    Reese AC; Landis P; Han M; Epstein JI; Carter HB
    J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2033-8. PubMed ID: 23680308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adverse Disease Features in Gleason Score 3 + 4 "Favorable Intermediate-Risk" Prostate Cancer: Implications for Active Surveillance.
    Morlacco A; Cheville JC; Rangel LJ; Gearman DJ; Karnes RJ
    Eur Urol; 2017 Sep; 72(3):442-447. PubMed ID: 27574819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Population based study of predictors of adverse pathology among candidates for active surveillance with Gleason 6 prostate cancer.
    Vellekoop A; Loeb S; Folkvaljon Y; Stattin P
    J Urol; 2014 Feb; 191(2):350-7. PubMed ID: 24071481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pathological outcomes in men with prostate cancer who are eligible for active surveillance.
    Wang SC; Chen CC; Yang CK; Hung SW; Jan YJ; Ou YC
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2018 Apr; 81(4):348-351. PubMed ID: 28988599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preoperative characteristics of high-Gleason disease predictive of favourable pathological and clinical outcomes at radical prostatectomy.
    Pierorazio PM; Ross AE; Lin BM; Epstein JI; Han M; Walsh PC; Partin AW; Pavlovich CP; Schaeffer EM
    BJU Int; 2012 Oct; 110(8):1122-8. PubMed ID: 22373045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A 17-Gene Genomic Prostate Score as a Predictor of Adverse Pathology in Men on Active Surveillance.
    Kornberg Z; Cooperberg MR; Cowan JE; Chan JM; Shinohara K; Simko JP; Tenggara I; Carroll PR
    J Urol; 2019 Oct; 202(4):702-709. PubMed ID: 31026214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. PTEN Loss in Gleason Score 3 + 4 = 7 Prostate Biopsies is Associated with Nonorgan Confined Disease at Radical Prostatectomy.
    Guedes LB; Tosoian JJ; Hicks J; Ross AE; Lotan TL
    J Urol; 2017 Apr; 197(4):1054-1059. PubMed ID: 27693448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. African American Race is Not Associated with Risk of Reclassification during Active Surveillance: Results from the Canary Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Study.
    Schenk JM; Newcomb LF; Zheng Y; Faino AV; Zhu K; Nyame YA; Brooks JD; Carroll PR; Cooperberg MR; Dash A; Filson CP; Gleave ME; Liss M; Martin FM; Morgan TM; Nelson PS; Thompson IM; Wagner AA; Lin DW
    J Urol; 2020 Apr; 203(4):727-733. PubMed ID: 31651227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What is the optimal definition of misclassification in patients with very low-risk prostate cancer eligible for active surveillance? Results from a multi-institutional series.
    Gandaglia G; Ploussard G; Isbarn H; Suardi N; De Visschere PJ; Futterer JJ; Ghadjar P; Massard C; Ost P; Sooriakumaran P; Surcel CI; van der Bergh RC; Montorsi F; Ficarra V; Giannarini G; Briganti A;
    Urol Oncol; 2015 Apr; 33(4):164.e1-9. PubMed ID: 25620154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score.
    Freedland SJ; Wieder JA; Jack GS; Dorey F; deKernion JB; Aronson WJ
    J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 12050502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of Initial Gleason Grade on Outcomes during Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.
    Masic S; Cowan JE; Washington SL; Nguyen HG; Shinohara K; Cooperberg MR; Carroll PR
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Oct; 1(5):386-394. PubMed ID: 31158077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction of pathological stage in patients with clinical stage T1c prostate cancer: the new challenge.
    Veltri RW; Miller MC; Mangold LA; O'Dowd GJ; Epstein JI; Partin AW
    J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):100-4. PubMed ID: 12050500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer in a Real-life Cohort: Comparing Outcomes for PRIAS-eligible and PRIAS-ineligible Patients.
    Soeterik TFW; van Melick HHE; Dijksman LM; Biesma DH; Witjes JA; van Basten JA
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Aug; 1(3):231-237. PubMed ID: 31102626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preoperative neural network using combined magnetic resonance imaging variables, prostate specific antigen and Gleason score to predict prostate cancer stage.
    Poulakis V; Witzsch U; De Vries R; Emmerlich V; Meves M; Altmannsberger HM; Becht E
    J Urol; 2004 Oct; 172(4 Pt 1):1306-10. PubMed ID: 15371829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.