These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23643924)

  • 1. Spatio-temporal Granger causality: a new framework.
    Luo Q; Lu W; Cheng W; Valdes-Sosa PA; Wen X; Ding M; Feng J
    Neuroimage; 2013 Oct; 79():241-63. PubMed ID: 23643924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fiber-centered Granger causality analysis.
    Li X; Li K; Guo L; Lim C; Liu T
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2011; 14(Pt 2):251-9. PubMed ID: 21995036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multivariate Granger causality: an estimation framework based on factorization of the spectral density matrix.
    Wen X; Rangarajan G; Ding M
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2013 Aug; 371(1997):20110610. PubMed ID: 23858479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using phase shift Granger causality to measure directed connectivity in EEG recordings.
    Marshall WJ; Lackner CL; Marriott P; Santesso DL; Segalowitz SJ
    Brain Connect; 2014 Dec; 4(10):826-41. PubMed ID: 25392086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Granger causality and information flow in multivariate processes.
    Blinowska KJ; Kuś R; Kamiński M
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2004 Nov; 70(5 Pt 1):050902. PubMed ID: 15600583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analyzing the connectivity between regions of interest: an approach based on cluster Granger causality for fMRI data analysis.
    Sato JR; Fujita A; Cardoso EF; Thomaz CE; Brammer MJ; Amaro E
    Neuroimage; 2010 Oct; 52(4):1444-55. PubMed ID: 20472076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A procedure to increase the power of Granger-causal analysis through temporal smoothing.
    Spencer E; Martinet LE; Eskandar EN; Chu CJ; Kolaczyk ED; Cash SS; Eden UT; Kramer MA
    J Neurosci Methods; 2018 Oct; 308():48-61. PubMed ID: 30031776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of time-variant EEG Granger causality for inspecting directed interdependencies of neural assemblies.
    Hesse W; Möller E; Arnold M; Schack B
    J Neurosci Methods; 2003 Mar; 124(1):27-44. PubMed ID: 12648763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Time, frequency, and time-varying Granger-causality measures in neuroscience.
    Cekic S; Grandjean D; Renaud O
    Stat Med; 2018 May; 37(11):1910-1931. PubMed ID: 29542141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The boundaries of state-space Granger causality analysis applied to BOLD simulated data: A comparative modelling and simulation approach.
    Fernandes TT; Direito B; Sayal A; Pereira J; Andrade A; Castelo-Branco M
    J Neurosci Methods; 2020 Jul; 341():108758. PubMed ID: 32416276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing the strength of directed influences among neural signals: an approach to noisy data.
    Sommerlade L; Thiel M; Mader M; Mader W; Timmer J; Platt B; Schelter B
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Jan; 239():47-64. PubMed ID: 25256644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analyzing brain networks with PCA and conditional Granger causality.
    Zhou Z; Chen Y; Ding M; Wright P; Lu Z; Liu Y
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Jul; 30(7):2197-206. PubMed ID: 18830956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of intra- and inter-subject variability of hemodynamic responses on group level Granger causality analyses.
    Schippers MB; Renken R; Keysers C
    Neuroimage; 2011 Jul; 57(1):22-36. PubMed ID: 21316469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multivariate Granger causality analysis of fMRI data.
    Deshpande G; LaConte S; James GA; Peltier S; Hu X
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Apr; 30(4):1361-73. PubMed ID: 18537116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigating effective brain connectivity from fMRI data: past findings and current issues with reference to Granger causality analysis.
    Deshpande G; Hu X
    Brain Connect; 2012; 2(5):235-45. PubMed ID: 23016794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Canonical Granger causality between regions of interest.
    Ashrafulla S; Haldar JP; Joshi AA; Leahy RM
    Neuroimage; 2013 Dec; 83():189-99. PubMed ID: 23811410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identifying Granger causal relationships between neural power dynamics and variables of interest.
    Winkler I; Haufe S; Porbadnigk AK; Müller KR; Dähne S
    Neuroimage; 2015 May; 111():489-504. PubMed ID: 25554431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dynamic Granger-Geweke causality modeling with application to interictal spike propagation.
    Lin FH; Hara K; Solo V; Vangel M; Belliveau JW; Stufflebeam SM; Hämäläinen MS
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Jun; 30(6):1877-86. PubMed ID: 19378280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Increasing fMRI sampling rate improves Granger causality estimates.
    Lin FH; Ahveninen J; Raij T; Witzel T; Chu YH; Jääskeläinen IP; Tsai KW; Kuo WJ; Belliveau JW
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e100319. PubMed ID: 24968356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identifying the pulsed neuron networks' structures by a nonlinear Granger causality method.
    Zhu MJ; Dong CY; Chen XY; Ren JW; Zhao XY
    BMC Neurosci; 2020 Feb; 21(1):7. PubMed ID: 32050908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.