418 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23644040)
41. A new method for the integration of digital dental models and cone-beam computed tomography images.
Lin HH; Chiang WC; Lo LJ; Wang CH
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():2328-31. PubMed ID: 24110191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. A comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and direct measurement in the examination of the mandibular canal and adjacent structures.
Kim TS; Caruso JM; Christensen H; Torabinejad M
J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1191-4. PubMed ID: 20630297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Three-dimensional accuracy of measurements made with software on cone-beam computed tomography images.
Lagravère MO; Carey J; Toogood RW; Major PW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):112-6. PubMed ID: 18617110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Virtual bite registration using intraoral digital scanning, CT and CBCT: In vitro evaluation of a new method and its implication for orthognathic surgery.
Nilsson J; Richards RG; Thor A; Kamer L
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Sep; 44(9):1194-200. PubMed ID: 27423538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Reproducibility and accuracy of linear measurements on dental models derived from cone-beam computed tomography compared with digital dental casts.
de Waard O; Rangel FA; Fudalej PS; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Breuning KH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Sep; 146(3):328-36. PubMed ID: 25172255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A new method to measure mesiodistal angulation and faciolingual inclination of each whole tooth with volumetric cone-beam computed tomography images.
Tong H; Enciso R; Van Elslande D; Major PW; Sameshima GT
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jul; 142(1):133-43. PubMed ID: 22748999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. A cone-beam CT based technique to augment the 3D virtual skull model with a detailed dental surface.
Swennen GR; Mommaerts MY; Abeloos J; De Clercq C; Lamoral P; Neyt N; Casselman J; Schutyser F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 38(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 19118978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Using a single cone-beam computed tomography scan to obtain full occlusal details, with the mandible in centric relation and maximum intercuspation.
El-Beialy AR; El Nigoumi A; Kaddah A; Afify H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 May; 153(5):741-746. PubMed ID: 29706222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The virtual human face: superimposing the simultaneously captured 3D photorealistic skin surface of the face on the untextured skin image of the CBCT scan.
Naudi KB; Benramadan R; Brocklebank L; Ju X; Khambay B; Ayoub A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 42(3):393-400. PubMed ID: 23228692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements obtained from cone beam computed tomography surface-rendered images for cephalometric analysis: influence of patient scanning position.
Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Sanderink G
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 19106265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Accuracy and validity of stitching sectional cone beam computed tomographic images.
Kim MK; Kang SH; Lee EH; Lee SH; Park W
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 23(4):1071-6. PubMed ID: 22777443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: a useful tool for dental age estimation?
Maret D; Peters OA; Dedouit F; Telmon N; Sixou M
Med Hypotheses; 2011 May; 76(5):700-2. PubMed ID: 21345598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption.
Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Willems G
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 21270321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Preliminary cone-beam computed tomography study evaluating dental and skeletal changes after treatment with a mandibular Schwarz appliance.
Tai K; Hotokezaka H; Park JH; Tai H; Miyajima K; Choi M; Kai LM; Mishima K
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):262.e1-262.e11; discussion 262-3. PubMed ID: 20816294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Application of integrated digital maxillodental model in computer aided design of individualized lingual brackets].
Tang M; Guo HM; Bai YX; Li S
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Aug; 47(8):501-4. PubMed ID: 23141662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Accuracy of linear measurements from cone-beam computed tomography-derived surface models of different voxel sizes.
Damstra J; Fourie Z; Huddleston Slater JJ; Ren Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jan; 137(1):16.e1-6; discussion 16-7. PubMed ID: 20122425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Accuracy and reliability of linear cephalometric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography scans of a dry human skull.
Berco M; Rigali PH; Miner RM; DeLuca S; Anderson NK; Will LA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):17.e1-9; discussion 17-8. PubMed ID: 19577142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Positional accuracy of a prosthetic treatment plan incorporated into a cone beam computed tomography scan using surface scan registration.
Jamjoom FZ; Kim DG; McGlumphy EA; Lee DJ; Yilmaz B
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):367-374. PubMed ID: 29703673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Registration of digital dental models and cone-beam computed tomography images using 3-dimensional planning software: Comparison of the accuracy according to scanning methods and software.
Park JH; Hwang CJ; Choi YJ; Houschyar KS; Yu JH; Bae SY; Cha JY
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Jun; 157(6):843-851. PubMed ID: 32487314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. In vivo accuracy of tooth surface reconstruction based on CBCT and dental MRI-A clinical pilot study.
Hilgenfeld T; Juerchott A; Deisenhofer UK; Weber D; Rues S; Rammelsberg P; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Schwindling FS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Sep; 30(9):920-927. PubMed ID: 31257638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]