These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23644178)

  • 1. Is attentional prioritisation of infant faces unique in humans?: Comparative demonstrations by modified dot-probe task in monkeys.
    Koda H; Sato A; Kato A
    Behav Processes; 2013 Sep; 98():31-6. PubMed ID: 23644178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. That baby caught my eye... attention capture by infant faces.
    Brosch T; Sander D; Scherer KR
    Emotion; 2007 Aug; 7(3):685-9. PubMed ID: 17683225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Baby Schema in Infant Faces Induces Cuteness Perception and Motivation for Caretaking in Adults.
    Glocker ML; Langleben DD; Ruparel K; Loughead JW; Gur RC; Sachser N
    Ethology; 2009 Mar; 115(3):257-263. PubMed ID: 22267884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conserved evolutionary history for quick detection of threatening faces.
    Kawai N; Kubo K; Masataka N; Hayakawa S
    Anim Cogn; 2016 May; 19(3):655-60. PubMed ID: 26714818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The flexibility of emotional attention: accessible social identities guide rapid attentional orienting.
    Brosch T; Van Bavel JJ
    Cognition; 2012 Nov; 125(2):309-16. PubMed ID: 22863414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Social touch alters newborn monkey behavior.
    Simpson EA; Maylott SE; Lazo RJ; Leonard KA; Kaburu SSK; Suomi SJ; Paukner A; Ferrari PF
    Infant Behav Dev; 2019 Nov; 57():101368. PubMed ID: 31521911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. It occurs after all: Attentional bias towards happy faces in the dot-probe task.
    Wirth BE; Wentura D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2463-2481. PubMed ID: 32236834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sexual dimorphism in facial shapes and their discrimination in Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata).
    Koba R; Izumi A; Nakamura K
    J Comp Psychol; 2009 Aug; 123(3):326-33. PubMed ID: 19685975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Task-irrelevant angry faces capture attention in visual search while modulated by resources.
    Huang SL; Chang YC; Chen YJ
    Emotion; 2011 Jun; 11(3):544-52. PubMed ID: 21517157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual recognition of age class and preference for infantile features: implications for species-specific vs universal cognitive traits in primates.
    Sato A; Koda H; Lemasson A; Nagumo S; Masataka N
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e38387. PubMed ID: 22685529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Face processing in humans and new world monkeys: the influence of experiential and ecological factors.
    Neiworth JJ; Hassett JM; Sylvester CJ
    Anim Cogn; 2007 Apr; 10(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 16909230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attentional bias to angry faces using the dot-probe task? It depends when you look for it.
    Cooper RM; Langton SR
    Behav Res Ther; 2006 Sep; 44(9):1321-9. PubMed ID: 16321361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of testosterone on attention and memory for emotional stimuli in male rhesus monkeys.
    King HM; Kurdziel LB; Meyer JS; Lacreuse A
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2012 Mar; 37(3):396-409. PubMed ID: 21820809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is the face-perception system human-specific at birth?
    Di Giorgio E; Leo I; Pascalis O; Simion F
    Dev Psychol; 2012 Jul; 48(4):1083-90. PubMed ID: 22142186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bodies capture attention when nothing is expected.
    Downing PE; Bray D; Rogers J; Childs C
    Cognition; 2004 Aug; 93(1):B27-38. PubMed ID: 15110728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development of preference for conspecific faces in human infants.
    Sanefuji W; Wada K; Yamamoto T; Mohri I; Taniike M
    Dev Psychol; 2014 Apr; 50(4):979-85. PubMed ID: 24294877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of the menstrual cycle on looking preferences for faces in female rhesus monkeys.
    Lacreuse A; Martin-Malivel J; Lange HS; Herndon JG
    Anim Cogn; 2007 Apr; 10(2):105-15. PubMed ID: 16909232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attentional biases to internal and external sources of potential threat in social anxiety.
    Pineles SL; Mineka S
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2005 May; 114(2):314-8. PubMed ID: 15869362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Baby schema modulates the brain reward system in nulliparous women.
    Glocker ML; Langleben DD; Ruparel K; Loughead JW; Valdez JN; Griffin MD; Sachser N; Gur RC
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2009 Jun; 106(22):9115-9. PubMed ID: 19451625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Humans and macaques employ similar face-processing strategies.
    Dahl CD; Wallraven C; Bülthoff HH; Logothetis NK
    Curr Biol; 2009 Mar; 19(6):509-13. PubMed ID: 19249210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.