These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23644462)
1. Nurses' interpretation of patient status descriptions on the Braden Scale. Choi J; Choi J; Kim H Clin Nurs Res; 2014 Jun; 23(3):336-46. PubMed ID: 23644462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An interrater reliability study of the assessment of pressure ulcer risk using the Braden scale and the classification of pressure ulcers in a home care setting. Kottner J; Halfens R; Dassen T Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1307-12. PubMed ID: 19406400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computer-based testing of the Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk. Maklebust J; Sieggreen MY; Sidor D; Gerlach MA; Bauer C; Anderson C Ostomy Wound Manage; 2005 Apr; 51(4):40-2, 44, 46 passim. PubMed ID: 16089059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pressure ulcer risk assessment in critical care: interrater reliability and validity studies of the Braden and Waterlow scales and subjective ratings in two intensive care units. Kottner J; Dassen T Int J Nurs Stud; 2010 Jun; 47(6):671-7. PubMed ID: 20003975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predicting pressure ulcer risk with the modified Braden, Braden, and Norton scales in acute care hospitals in Mainland China. Kwong E; Pang S; Wong T; Ho J; Shao-ling X; Li-jun T Appl Nurs Res; 2005 May; 18(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 15991112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of Web-based Braden Scale training on the reliability and precision of Braden Scale pressure ulcer risk assessments. Magnan MA; Maklebust J J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2008; 35(2):199-208; discussion 209-12. PubMed ID: 18344795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Mixed-methods Study to Assess Interrater Reliability and Nurse Perception of the Braden Scale in a Tertiary Acute Care Setting. Ho CH; Cheung A; Southern D; Ocampo W; Kaufman J; Hogan DB; Baylis B; Conly JM; Stelfox HT; Ghali WA Ostomy Wound Manage; 2016 Dec; 62(12):30-38. PubMed ID: 28054924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A redesigned pressure ulcer program based on nurses' beliefs about the Braden Scale. Tchato L; Putnam J; Raup GH J Nurs Care Qual; 2013; 28(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 23803899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of patient risk for pressure ulcer development with nursing use of preventive interventions. Xakellis GC; Frantz RA; Arteaga M; Nguyen M; Lewis A J Am Geriatr Soc; 1992 Dec; 40(12):1250-4. PubMed ID: 1447443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of three commonly used pressure ulcer risk assessment scales. O'Tuathail C; Taqi R Br J Nurs; 2011 Mar 24-Apr 14; 20(6):S27-8, S30, S32 Passim. PubMed ID: 21471902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interrater Reliability of the Braden and Braden Q by Skin Champion Nurses. Riccioni N; Berlanga R; Hagan J; Schier R; Gordon M J Pediatr Nurs; 2019; 44():9-15. PubMed ID: 30683286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An interrater reliability study of the Braden scale in two nursing homes. Kottner J; Dassen T Int J Nurs Stud; 2008 Oct; 45(10):1501-11. PubMed ID: 18395726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]