These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

349 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2364513)

  • 1. Mechanism of cardiac defibrillation in open-chest dogs with unipolar DC-coupled simultaneous activation and shock potential recordings.
    Witkowski FX; Penkoske PA; Plonsey R
    Circulation; 1990 Jul; 82(1):244-60. PubMed ID: 2364513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Epicardial activation times after defibrillation in open-chest dogs using unipolar DC-coupled activation recordings.
    Witkowski FX; Penkoske PA
    J Electrocardiol; 1990; 23 Suppl():39-45. PubMed ID: 2090760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Activation during ventricular defibrillation in open-chest dogs. Evidence of complete cessation and regeneration of ventricular fibrillation after unsuccessful shocks.
    Chen PS; Shibata N; Dixon EG; Wolf PD; Danieley ND; Sweeney MB; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    J Clin Invest; 1986 Mar; 77(3):810-23. PubMed ID: 3949979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Epicardial mapping of ventricular defibrillation with monophasic and biphasic shocks in dogs.
    Zhou X; Daubert JP; Wolf PD; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circ Res; 1993 Jan; 72(1):145-60. PubMed ID: 8417837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of activation during ventricular fibrillation and following unsuccessful defibrillation shocks in open-chest dogs.
    Chen PS; Wolf PD; Melnick SD; Danieley ND; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circ Res; 1990 Jun; 66(6):1544-60. PubMed ID: 2344664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improved defibrillation thresholds with large contoured epicardial electrodes and biphasic waveforms.
    Dixon EG; Tang AS; Wolf PD; Meador JT; Fine MJ; Calfee RV; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1987 Nov; 76(5):1176-84. PubMed ID: 3665001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cardiac potential and potential gradient fields generated by single, combined, and sequential shocks during ventricular defibrillation.
    Wharton JM; Wolf PD; Smith WM; Chen PS; Frazier DW; Yabe S; Danieley N; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1992 Apr; 85(4):1510-23. PubMed ID: 1555291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of multiple shocks on canine cardiac defibrillation.
    Flaker G; Schuder J; McDaniel W
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 1):1580-4. PubMed ID: 1704508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Internal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in sheep.
    Cooper RA; Alferness CA; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1993 May; 87(5):1673-86. PubMed ID: 8491023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of defibrillation shock energy and timing on 3-D computer model of heart.
    Province RA; Fishler MG; Thakor NV
    Ann Biomed Eng; 1993; 21(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 8434817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Epicardial activation after unsuccessful defibrillation shocks in dogs.
    Shibata N; Chen PS; Dixon EG; Wolf PD; Danieley ND; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Am J Physiol; 1988 Oct; 255(4 Pt 2):H902-9. PubMed ID: 3177679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The potential gradient field created by epicardial defibrillation electrodes in dogs.
    Chen PS; Wolf PD; Claydon FJ; Dixon EG; Vidaillet HJ; Danieley ND; Pilkington TC; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1986 Sep; 74(3):626-36. PubMed ID: 3742760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of pulse separation between two sequential biphasic shocks given over different lead configurations on ventricular defibrillation efficacy.
    Johnson EE; Alferness CA; Wolf PD; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1992 Jun; 85(6):2267-74. PubMed ID: 1591840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Epicardial sock mapping following monophasic and biphasic shocks of equal voltage with an endocardial lead system.
    Usui M; Callihan RL; Walker RG; Walcott GP; Rollins DL; Wolf PD; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1996 Apr; 7(4):322-34. PubMed ID: 8777480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of shock strengths on ventricular defibrillation failure.
    Chattipakorn N; Banville I; Gray RA; Ideker RE
    Cardiovasc Res; 2004 Jan; 61(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 14732200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Overlapping sequential pulses. A new waveform for transthoracic defibrillation.
    Kerber RE; Spencer KT; Kallok MJ; Birkett C; Smith R; Yoerger D; Kieso RA
    Circulation; 1994 May; 89(5):2369-79. PubMed ID: 8181163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the defibrillation threshold and the upper limit of ventricular vulnerability.
    Chen PS; Shibata N; Dixon EG; Martin RO; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1986 May; 73(5):1022-8. PubMed ID: 3698224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Initial clinical experience with endocardial defibrillation using an implantable cardioverter/defibrillator with a triple-electrode system.
    Saksena S; Tullo NG; Krol RB; Mauro AM
    Arch Intern Med; 1989 Oct; 149(10):2333-9. PubMed ID: 2802898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A critical period of ventricular fibrillation more susceptible to defibrillation: real-time waveform analysis using a single ECG lead.
    Hsia PW; Frerk S; Allen CA; Wise RM; Cohen NM; Damiano RJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Apr; 19(4 Pt 1):418-30. PubMed ID: 8848389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reentry site during fibrillation induction in relation to defibrillation efficacy for different shock waveforms.
    Ideker RE; Alferness C; Melnick S; Sreenan KM; Johnson E; Smith WM
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2001 May; 12(5):581-91. PubMed ID: 11386521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.