79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23645953)
1. Evaluation of Ki67, p16 and CK17 Markers in Differentiating Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Benign Lesions.
Sari Aslani F; Safaei A; Pourjabali M; Momtahan M
Iran J Med Sci; 2013 Mar; 38(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 23645953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Immunohistochemical Study of p16INK4A, MIB-1 and CK17 in Pre-neoplastic and Neoplastic Epithelial Lesions of Cervix.
Sahu PD; Khandeparkar SGSKS; Joshi AR; Kulkarni MM; Gogate BP; Newadkar ND; Shinde PA; Battin SS
Gulf J Oncolog; 2022 Sep; 1(40):29-37. PubMed ID: 36448068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. CK17 and p16 expression patterns distinguish (atypical) immature squamous metaplasia from high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN III).
Regauer S; Reich O
Histopathology; 2007 Apr; 50(5):629-35. PubMed ID: 17394499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Role of p16, CK17, p63, and human papillomavirus in diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and distinction from its mimics.
Selvi K; Badhe BA; Papa D; Ganesh RN
Int J Surg Pathol; 2014 May; 22(3):221-30. PubMed ID: 23883975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Coordinate expression of cytokeratin 8 and cytokeratin 17 immunohistochemical staining in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical squamous cell carcinoma: an immunohistochemical analysis and review of the literature.
Ikeda K; Tate G; Suzuki T; Mitsuya T
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Mar; 108(3):598-602. PubMed ID: 18191996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Expression of P63, P16 and CK17 in Atypical Squamous Metaplasia and Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia.
Iranpour M; Dabiri S; Rezazade-Jabalbarezi M; Bagheri F
Iran J Pathol; 2021; 16(2):181-189. PubMed ID: 33936229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Role of p16/INK4a and Ki-67 as specific biomarkers for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: An institutional study.
Hebbar A; Murthy VS
J Lab Physicians; 2017; 9(2):104-110. PubMed ID: 28367025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation of P16 (Ink4a) and CK17 to HPV (16E6+18E6) in Premalignant and Malignant Lesions of Uterine Cervix: A Clinicopathologic Study.
Chaloob MK; Hussein AG; Qasim BJ
Iran J Pathol; 2016; 11(4):377-390. PubMed ID: 28855930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Re-evaluation of Negative Cone Biopsy Results with Ki-67 and p16 Immunostaining following Positive Cervical Biopsy.
Sari Aslani F; Zolmajdi N; Akbarzadeh-Jahromi M; Momtahan M; Torfenezhad P
Iran J Med Sci; 2020 Nov; 45(6):469-476. PubMed ID: 33281264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Ki67 index and P16 expression in different grades of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Hosseini MS; Talayeh M; Afshar Moghaddam N; Arab M; Farzaneh F; Ashrafganjoei T
Caspian J Intern Med; 2023; 14(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 36741489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical Implication of p16, Ki-67, and Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen Expression in Cervical Neoplasia: Improvement of Diagnostic Accuracy for High-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion and Prediction of Resection Margin Involvement on Conization Specimen.
Kim TH; Han JH; Shin E; Noh JH; Kim HS; Song YS
J Cancer Prev; 2015 Mar; 20(1):70-7. PubMed ID: 25853106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. P16/Ki-67 Immunostaining is Useful in Stratification of Atypical Metaplastic Epithelium of the Cervix.
Walts AE; Bose S
Clin Med Pathol; 2008; 1():35-42. PubMed ID: 21876649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. P16 and Ki67 immunostaining is a useful adjunct in the assessment of biopsies for HPV-associated anal intraepithelial neoplasia.
Walts AE; Lechago J; Bose S
Am J Surg Pathol; 2006 Jul; 30(7):795-801. PubMed ID: 16819320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. p16(INK4a) immunoprofiles of squamous lesions of the uterine cervix-implications for the reclassification of atypical immature squamous metaplasia.
Skapa P; Robova H; Rob L; Zamecnik J
Pathol Oncol Res; 2013 Oct; 19(4):707-14. PubMed ID: 23686439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Expression of the p16 and Ki-67 in relation to the grade of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and high-risk human papillomavirus infection.
Nam EJ; Kim JW; Hong JW; Jang HS; Lee SY; Jang SY; Lee DW; Kim SW; Kim JH; Kim YT; Kim S; Kim JW
J Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Sep; 19(3):162-8. PubMed ID: 19471565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of the association between the frequency of micronucleus and p
Gashi G; Mahovlić V; Bahtiri E; Kurshumliu F; Podrimaj-Bytyqi A; Elezaj IR
Biotech Histochem; 2018; 93(7):496-504. PubMed ID: 29790789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MIB 1 immunostaining in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: prognostic significance in mild and moderate lesions.
Garzetti GG; Ciavattini A; De Nictolis M; Lucarini G; Goteri G; Romanini C; Biagini G
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1996; 42(4):261-6. PubMed ID: 8979100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. p16 immunocytochemistry on cell blocks as an adjunct to cervical cytology: Potential reflex testing on specially prepared cell blocks from residual liquid-based cytology specimens.
Shidham VB; Mehrotra R; Varsegi G; D'Amore KL; Hunt B; Narayan R
Cytojournal; 2011 Jan; 8():1. PubMed ID: 21369522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Utility of P16/INK4a and Ki-67 in Preneoplasticand Neoplastic Lesions of Cervix.
Sangwaiya A; Gill M; Bairwa S; Chaudhry M; Sen R; Prakash Kataria S
Iran J Pathol; 2018; 13(3):308-316. PubMed ID: 30636953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationship of P16 and Ki67 in recurrence of HPV infection and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Wang X; Zhao Y; Zou X; Wang L
Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2020; 13(12):3174-3180. PubMed ID: 33425118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
