These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23646131)

  • 1. Revisiting the effect of capture heterogeneity on survival estimates in capture-mark-recapture studies: does it matter?
    Abadi F; Botha A; Altwegg R
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e62636. PubMed ID: 23646131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Open capture-recapture models with heterogeneity: I. Cormack-Jolly-Seber model.
    Pledger S; Pollock KH; Norris JL
    Biometrics; 2003 Dec; 59(4):786-94. PubMed ID: 14969456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Open capture-recapture models with heterogeneity: II. Jolly-Seber model.
    Pledger S; Pollock KH; Norris JL
    Biometrics; 2010 Sep; 66(3):883-90. PubMed ID: 19930186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of social organization, trap arrangement and density, sampling scale, and population density on bias in population size estimation using some common mark-recapture estimators.
    Gupta M; Joshi A; Vidya TN
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173609. PubMed ID: 28306735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Importance of accounting for detection heterogeneity when estimating abundance: the case of French wolves.
    Cubaynes S; Pradel R; Choquet R; Duchamp C; Gaillard JM; Lebreton JD; Marboutin E; Miquel C; Reboulet AM; Poillot C; Taberlet P; Gimenez O
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):621-6. PubMed ID: 20105205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maximum likelihood estimation for model Mt,α for capture-recapture data with misidentification.
    Vale RT; Fewster RM; Carroll EL; Patenaude NJ
    Biometrics; 2014 Dec; 70(4):962-71. PubMed ID: 24942186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pooled population parameter from mark-recapture data.
    Hargrove JW; Borland CH
    Biometrics; 1994 Dec; 50(4):1129-41. PubMed ID: 7786993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robustness of Eco-Epidemiological Capture-Recapture Parameter Estimates to Variation in Infection State Uncertainty.
    Benhaiem S; Marescot L; Hofer H; East ML; Lebreton JD; Kramer-Schadt S; Gimenez O
    Front Vet Sci; 2018; 5():197. PubMed ID: 30211175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Explaining detection heterogeneity with finite mixture and non-Euclidean movement in spatially explicit capture-recapture models.
    Marrotte RR; Howe EJ; Beauclerc KB; Potter D; Northrup JM
    PeerJ; 2022; 10():e13490. PubMed ID: 35694380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multiple data sources improve DNA-based mark-recapture population estimates of grizzly bears.
    Boulanger J; Kendall KC; Stetz JB; Roon DA; Waits LP; Paetkau D
    Ecol Appl; 2008 Apr; 18(3):577-89. PubMed ID: 18488618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Coping with intrasexual behavioral differences: Capture-recapture abundance estimation of male cheetah.
    Edwards S; Fischer M; Wachter B; Melzheimer J
    Ecol Evol; 2018 Sep; 8(18):9171-9180. PubMed ID: 30377492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bayesian estimation of a cancer population by capture-recapture with individual capture heterogeneity and small sample.
    Bailly L; Daurès JP; Dunais B; Pradier C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Apr; 15():39. PubMed ID: 25902941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Incorporating capture heterogeneity in the estimation of autoregressive coefficients of animal population dynamics using capture-recapture data.
    Nicolau PG; Sørbye SH; Yoccoz NG
    Ecol Evol; 2020 Dec; 10(23):12710-12726. PubMed ID: 33304489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mixture regression models for closed population capture-recapture data.
    Tounkara F; Rivest LP
    Biometrics; 2015 Sep; 71(3):721-30. PubMed ID: 25963047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new approach to the "apparent survival" problem: estimating true survival rates from mark-recapture studies.
    Gilroy JJ; Virzi T; Boulton RL; Lockwood JL
    Ecology; 2012 Jul; 93(7):1509-16. PubMed ID: 22919897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical approaches to identify subgroups in meta-analysis of individual participant data: a simulation study.
    Belias M; Rovers MM; Reitsma JB; Debray TPA; IntHout J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Sep; 19(1):183. PubMed ID: 31477023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trap configuration and spacing influences parameter estimates in spatial capture-recapture models.
    Sun CC; Fuller AK; Royle JA
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e88025. PubMed ID: 24505361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Comparison of Grizzly Bear Demographic Parameters Estimated from Non-Spatial and Spatial Open Population Capture-Recapture Models.
    Whittington J; Sawaya MA
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0134446. PubMed ID: 26230262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improved methods for estimating abundance and related demographic parameters from mark-resight data.
    McClintock BT; White GC; Pryde MA
    Biometrics; 2019 Sep; 75(3):799-809. PubMed ID: 31004437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new mark-recapture approach for abundance estimation of social species.
    Hickey JR; Sollmann R
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0208726. PubMed ID: 30571710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.