These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23647045)

  • 21. Negative affectivity and social inhibition in cardiovascular disease: evaluating type-D personality and its assessment using item response theory.
    Emons WH; Meijer RR; Denollet J
    J Psychosom Res; 2007 Jul; 63(1):27-39. PubMed ID: 17586335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The Usability of CAT System for Assessing the Depressive Level of Japanese-A Study on Psychometric Properties and Response Behavior.
    Iwata N; Kikuchi K; Fujihara Y
    Int J Behav Med; 2016 Aug; 23(4):427-37. PubMed ID: 26272358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An Item Response Theory-Based, Computerized Adaptive Testing Version of the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory: Words & Sentences (CDI:WS).
    Makransky G; Dale PS; Havmose P; Bleses D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Apr; 59(2):281-9. PubMed ID: 27050253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A computerized adaptive test for patients with shoulder impairments produced responsive measures of function.
    Hart DL; Wang YC; Cook KF; Mioduski JE
    Phys Ther; 2010 Jun; 90(6):928-38. PubMed ID: 20395304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Progress in assessing physical function in arthritis: PROMIS short forms and computerized adaptive testing.
    Fries JF; Cella D; Rose M; Krishnan E; Bruce B
    J Rheumatol; 2009 Sep; 36(9):2061-6. PubMed ID: 19738214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Applying Item Response Theory to the OPD Structure Questionnaire: Identification of a Unidimensional Core Construct and Feasibility of Computer Adaptive Testing.
    Obbarius A; Ehrenthal JC; Fischer F; Liegl G; Obbarius N; Sarrar L; Rose M
    J Pers Assess; 2021; 103(5):645-658. PubMed ID: 33052064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A discussion of modern versus traditional psychometrics as applied to personality assessment scales.
    Reise SP; Henson JM
    J Pers Assess; 2003 Oct; 81(2):93-103. PubMed ID: 12946916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The accuracy of the Life Orientation Test-Revised (LOT-R) in measuring dispositional optimism: evidence from item response theory analyses.
    Chiesi F; Galli S; Primi C; Innocenti Borgi P; Bonacchi A
    J Pers Assess; 2013; 95(5):523-9. PubMed ID: 23570253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Simulated computerized adaptive test for patients with shoulder impairments was efficient and produced valid measures of function.
    Hart DL; Cook KF; Mioduski JE; Teal CR; Crane PK
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Mar; 59(3):290-8. PubMed ID: 16488360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Personality in Germany and Minnesota: an IRT-based comparison of MPQ self-reports.
    Johnson W; Spinath F; Krueger RF; Angleitner A; Riemann R
    J Pers; 2008 Jun; 76(3):665-706. PubMed ID: 18399949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparability of self- and other-rated personality structure.
    Nuzum H; Ready RE; Clark LA
    Psychol Assess; 2019 Jun; 31(6):741-750. PubMed ID: 30730190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dynamic assessment of health outcomes: time to let the CAT out of the bag?
    Cook KF; O'Malley KJ; Roddey TS
    Health Serv Res; 2005 Oct; 40(5 Pt 2):1694-711. PubMed ID: 16179003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Validation of the FFM PD count technique for screening personality pathology in later middle-aged and older adults.
    Van den Broeck J; Rossi G; De Clercq B; Dierckx E; Bastiaansen L
    Aging Ment Health; 2013; 17(2):180-8. PubMed ID: 22913535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Analyzing psychopathology items: a case for nonparametric item response theory modeling.
    Meijer RR; Baneke JJ
    Psychol Methods; 2004 Sep; 9(3):354-68. PubMed ID: 15355153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Psychometric properties for the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding: dichotomous versus polytomous conventional and IRT scoring.
    Vispoel WP; Kim HY
    Psychol Assess; 2014 Sep; 26(3):878-91. PubMed ID: 24708082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Computerized Adaptive Diagnosis and Testing of Mental Health Disorders.
    Gibbons RD; Weiss DJ; Frank E; Kupfer D
    Annu Rev Clin Psychol; 2016; 12():83-104. PubMed ID: 26651865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Adaptive cognitive testing in cerebrovascular disease and vascular dementia.
    Wouters H; de Koning I; Zwinderman AH; van Gool WA; Schmand B; Buiter M; Lindeboom R
    Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord; 2009; 28(5):486-92. PubMed ID: 19940481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. simpolycat: an SAS program for conducting CAT simulation based on polytomous IRT models.
    Chen SK; Cook KF
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 May; 41(2):499-506. PubMed ID: 19363190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The assessment of pain quality: an item response theory analysis.
    Waterman C; Victor TW; Jensen MP; Gould EM; Gammaitoni AR; Galer BS
    J Pain; 2010 Mar; 11(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 20211439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Item selection methods in multidimensional computerized adaptive testing for forced-choice items using Thurstonian IRT model.
    Wang Q; Zheng Y; Liu K; Cai Y; Peng S; Tu D
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Feb; 56(2):600-614. PubMed ID: 36750522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.