These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23647046)

  • 21. The brain's emotional foundations of human personality and the Affective Neuroscience Personality Scales.
    Davis KL; Panksepp J
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2011 Oct; 35(9):1946-58. PubMed ID: 21527289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A meta-analysis on individual differences in primary emotional systems and Big Five personality traits.
    Marengo D; Davis KL; Gradwohl GÖ; Montag C
    Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):7453. PubMed ID: 33811242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clinical utility of the Five-Factor Model of personality disorder.
    Mullins-Sweatt SN; Lengel GJ
    J Pers; 2012 Dec; 80(6):1615-39. PubMed ID: 22321379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of personality item writing on psychometric properties of ideal-point and likert scales.
    Huang J; Mead AD
    Psychol Assess; 2014 Dec; 26(4):1162-72. PubMed ID: 24999752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Validation evidence for three coping measures.
    Clark KK; Bormann CA; Cropanzano RS; James K
    J Pers Assess; 1995 Dec; 65(3):434-55. PubMed ID: 8609584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cross-Cultural Affective Neuroscience.
    Özkarar-Gradwohl FG
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():794. PubMed ID: 31037064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Affective Neuroscience Personality Scales: Linking the adjective and statement-based inventories with the Big Five Inventory in English and German-speaking samples.
    Rozgonjuk D; Davis KL; Sindermann C; Montag C
    Personal Neurosci; 2021; 4():e7. PubMed ID: 35434503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Using the five-factor model to identify a new personality disorder domain: the case for experiential permeability.
    Piedmont RL; Sherman MF; Sherman NC; Dy-Liacco GS; Williams JE
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Jun; 96(6):1245-58. PubMed ID: 19469599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A five-factor measure of dependent personality traits.
    Gore WL; Presnall JR; Miller JD; Lynam DR; Widiger TA
    J Pers Assess; 2012; 94(5):488-99. PubMed ID: 22475264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Psychometric properties of an abbreviated instrument of the five-factor model.
    Mullins-Sweatt SN; Jamerson JE; Samuel DB; Olson DR; Widiger TA
    Assessment; 2006 Jun; 13(2):119-37. PubMed ID: 16672728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Affective Neuroscience of Sexuality: Development of a LUST Scale.
    Fuchshuber J; Jauk E; Hiebler-Ragger M; Unterrainer HF
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2022; 16():853706. PubMed ID: 35295884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The mini-IPIP scales: tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality.
    Donnellan MB; Oswald FL; Baird BM; Lucas RE
    Psychol Assess; 2006 Jun; 18(2):192-203. PubMed ID: 16768595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessment of maladaptive variants of Five-Factor Model traits.
    Lynam DR
    J Pers; 2012 Dec; 80(6):1593-614. PubMed ID: 22321444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Psychometric adequacy and comparability of the short and full forms of the Personality Assessment Inventory.
    Frazier TW; Naugle RI; Haggerty KA
    Psychol Assess; 2006 Sep; 18(3):324-33. PubMed ID: 16953735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Functional connectivity in the resting brain as biological correlate of the Affective Neuroscience Personality Scales.
    Deris N; Montag C; Reuter M; Weber B; Markett S
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 147():423-431. PubMed ID: 27903439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Development of a social inclusion index to capture subjective and objective life domains (Phase II): psychometric development study.
    Huxley P; Evans S; Madge S; Webber M; Burchardt T; McDaid D; Knapp M
    Health Technol Assess; 2012; 16(1):iii-vii, ix-xii, -1-241. PubMed ID: 22260923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. More information from fewer questions: the factor structure and item properties of the original and brief fear of negative evaluation scale.
    Rodebaugh TL; Woods CM; Thissen DM; Heimberg RG; Chambless DL; Rapee RM
    Psychol Assess; 2004 Jun; 16(2):169-81. PubMed ID: 15222813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The Work-Health-Check (WHC): a brief new tool for assessing psychosocial stress in the workplace.
    Gadinger MC; Schilling O; Litaker D; Fischer JE
    Work; 2012; 43(3):345-60. PubMed ID: 22927585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Preliminary factor and psychometric analysis of the Motivation for Fear (MOTIF) survey.
    Nebel-Schwalm MS; Davis TE
    J Anxiety Disord; 2011 Jun; 25(5):731-40. PubMed ID: 21514097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A short form of the Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology-Basic Questionnaire (DAPP-BQ): the DAPP-SF.
    van Kampen D; de Beurs E; Andrea H
    Psychiatry Res; 2008 Jul; 160(1):115-28. PubMed ID: 18514918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.