192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23648006)
1. Trends in epistaxis embolization in the United States: a study of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2003-2010.
Brinjikji W; Kallmes DF; Cloft HJ
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2013 Jul; 24(7):969-73. PubMed ID: 23648006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Recent trends in epistaxis management in the United States: 2008-2010.
Villwock JA; Jones K
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Dec; 139(12):1279-84. PubMed ID: 24136624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Early versus delayed treatment of primary epistaxis in the United States.
Villwock JA; Goyal P
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol; 2014 Jan; 4(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 24243752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inpatient management of epistaxis: outcomes and cost.
Goddard JC; Reiter ER
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2005 May; 132(5):707-12. PubMed ID: 15886622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Endovascular procedures for aorto-iliac occlusive disease are associated with superior short-term clinical and economic outcomes compared with open surgery in the inpatient population.
Indes JE; Mandawat A; Tuggle CT; Muhs B; Sosa JA
J Vasc Surg; 2010 Nov; 52(5):1173-9, 1179.e1. PubMed ID: 20691560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness analysis of endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation vs arterial embolization for intractable epistaxis.
Rudmik L; Leung R
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2014 Sep; 140(9):802-8. PubMed ID: 25123233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Endovascular versus open repair of ruptured descending thoracic aortic aneurysms: a nationwide risk-adjusted study of 923 patients.
Gopaldas RR; Dao TK; LeMaire SA; Huh J; Coselli JS
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2011 Nov; 142(5):1010-8. PubMed ID: 21907356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Arterial ligation versus embolization in epistaxis management: Counterintuitive national trends.
Sylvester MJ; Chung SY; Guinand LA; Govindan A; Baredes S; Eloy JA
Laryngoscope; 2017 May; 127(5):1017-1020. PubMed ID: 28008625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Trends in epistaxis embolization in the United States: a study of the nationwide inpatient sample 2003-2010--caveat emptor.
Washington CW; Derdeyn CP
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2013 Jul; 24(7):974. PubMed ID: 23796084
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Risk factors for readmission after lower extremity procedures for peripheral artery disease.
Vogel TR; Kruse RL
J Vasc Surg; 2013 Jul; 58(1):90-7.e1-4. PubMed ID: 23541547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Endovascular treatment of epistaxis.
Vokes DE; McIvor NP; Wattie WJ; Chaplin JM; Morton RP
ANZ J Surg; 2004 Sep; 74(9):751-3. PubMed ID: 15379802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Endovascular repair with fenestrated-branched stent grafts improves 30-day outcomes for complex aortic aneurysms compared with open repair.
Tsilimparis N; Perez S; Dayama A; Ricotta JJ
Ann Vasc Surg; 2013 Apr; 27(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 23403330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Endovascular repair is associated with superior clinical outcomes in patients transferred for treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Mandawat A; Mandawat A; Sosa JA; Muhs BE; Indes JE
J Endovasc Ther; 2012 Feb; 19(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 22313208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transnasal Endoscopic Sphenopalatine Artery Ligation Compared With Embolization for Intractable Epistaxis: A Long-term Analysis.
de Bonnecaze G; Gallois Y; Bonneville F; Vergez S; Chaput B; Serrano E
Am J Rhinol Allergy; 2018 May; 32(3):188-193. PubMed ID: 29676168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Epidemiology and Management of Pediatric Epistaxis.
Baugh TP; Chang CWD
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2018 Oct; 159(4):712-716. PubMed ID: 29986629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. To Pack or Not to Pack: Inpatient Management of Epistaxis in the Elderly.
Zhou AH; Chung SY; Sylvester MJ; Zaki M; Svider PS; Hsueh WD; Baredes S; Eloy JA
Am J Rhinol Allergy; 2018 Nov; 32(6):539-545. PubMed ID: 30270635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of internal maxillary artery ligation versus embolization for refractory posterior epistaxis.
Cullen MM; Tami TA
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1998 May; 118(5):636-42. PubMed ID: 9591862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Carotid artery stenting has increased rates of postprocedure stroke, death, and resource utilization than does carotid endarterectomy in the United States, 2005.
McPhee JT; Schanzer A; Messina LM; Eslami MH
J Vasc Surg; 2008 Dec; 48(6):1442-50, 1450.e1. PubMed ID: 18829236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcomes of endovascular occlusion and stenting in the treatment of carotid blowout.
Brinjikji W; Cloft HJ
Interv Neuroradiol; 2015 Aug; 21(4):543-7. PubMed ID: 26089247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Endovascular embolization treatment for intractable epistaxis].
Klein GE; Köle W; Karaic R; Szolar DH; Hausegger KA; Schreyer HH
Laryngorhinootologie; 1997 Feb; 76(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 9172634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
