117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23649541)
41. Hepatic arterial buffer response in patients with advanced cirrhosis.
Gülberg V; Haag K; Rössle M; Gerbes AL
Hepatology; 2002 Mar; 35(3):630-4. PubMed ID: 11870377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Wideband MRE and static mechanical indentation of human liver specimen: sensitivity of viscoelastic constants to the alteration of tissue structure in hepatic fibrosis.
Reiter R; Freise C; Jöhrens K; Kamphues C; Seehofer D; Stockmann M; Somasundaram R; Asbach P; Braun J; Samani A; Sack I
J Biomech; 2014 May; 47(7):1665-74. PubMed ID: 24657103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Ultrasound frame rate requirements for cardiac elastography: experimental and in vivo results.
Chen H; Varghese T; Rahko PS; Zagzebski JA
Ultrasonics; 2009 Jan; 49(1):98-111. PubMed ID: 18657839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. [Hemodynamic changes in portal system after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS)].
Li W; Xiao Y; Xu H
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 1995 Aug; 33(8):476-8. PubMed ID: 8706563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Image-guided intervention in management of complications of portal hypertension: more than TIPS for success.
Kirby JM; Cho KJ; Midia M
Radiographics; 2013; 33(5):1473-96. PubMed ID: 24025936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Physiologic Reduction of Hepatic Venous Blood Flow by the Valsalva Maneuver Decreases Liver Stiffness.
Ipek-Ugay S; Tzschätzsch H; Braun J; Fischer T; Sack I
J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Jul; 36(7):1305-1311. PubMed ID: 28319252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. [Effects of percutaneous intrahepatic portosystemic shunt on splanchnic and systemic hemodynamics in patients with portal hypertension].
François E; García-Pagán JC; Bru C; Feu F; Gilabert R; Escorsell A; Bosch J; Rodés J
Gastroenterol Hepatol; 1997 Jan; 20(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 9072189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Portosystemic pressure gradient during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt with Viatorr stent graft: what is the critical low threshold to avoid medically uncontrolled low pressure gradient related complications?
Chung HH; Razavi MK; Sze DY; Frisoli JK; Kee ST; Dake MD; Hellinger JC; Kang BC
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Jan; 23(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 18171347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Patient-activated three-dimensional multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography for high-resolution mechanical imaging of the liver and spleen.
Guo J; Hirsch S; Streitberger KJ; Kamphues C; Asbach P; Braun J; Sack I
Rofo; 2014 Mar; 186(3):260-6. PubMed ID: 23999784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Measurement of in vivo local shear modulus using MR elastography multiple-phase patchwork offsets.
Suga M; Matsuda T; Minato K; Oshiro O; Chihara K; Okamoto J; Takizawa O; Komori M; Takahashi T
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jul; 50(7):908-15. PubMed ID: 12848359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The subcutaneous splenic transposition prevents liver injury induced by excessive portal pressure after massive hepatectomy.
Koyama S; Sato Y; Hatakeyama K
Hepatogastroenterology; 2003; 50(49):37-42. PubMed ID: 12629986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Quantitative shear wave magnetic resonance elastography: comparison to a dynamic shear material test.
Ringleb SI; Chen Q; Lake DS; Manduca A; Ehman RL; An KN
Magn Reson Med; 2005 May; 53(5):1197-201. PubMed ID: 15844144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. High-resolution mechanical imaging of the human brain by three-dimensional multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography at 7T.
Braun J; Guo J; Lützkendorf R; Stadler J; Papazoglou S; Hirsch S; Sack I; Bernarding J
Neuroimage; 2014 Apr; 90():308-14. PubMed ID: 24368262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Microvasculature alters the dispersion properties of shear waves--a multi-frequency MR elastography study.
Jugé L; Petiet A; Lambert SA; Nicole P; Chatelin S; Vilgrain V; Van Beers BE; Bilston LE; Sinkus R
NMR Biomed; 2015 Dec; 28(12):1763-71. PubMed ID: 26768491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Static and dynamic liver stiffness: An ex vivo porcine liver study using MR elastography.
Yang C; Yin M; Glaser KJ; Zhu X; Xu K; Ehman RL; Chen J
Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Dec; 44():92-95. PubMed ID: 28866387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The Role of Magnetic Resonance Elastography in the Diagnosis of Noncirrhotic Portal Hypertension.
Navin PJ; Gidener T; Allen AM; Yin M; Takahashi N; Torbenson MS; Kamath PS; Ehman RL; Venkatesh SK
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Dec; 18(13):3051-3053.e2. PubMed ID: 31629882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. A compact 0.5 T MR elastography device and its application for studying viscoelasticity changes in biological tissues during progressive formalin fixation.
Braun J; Tzschätzsch H; Körting C; Ariza de Schellenberger A; Jenderka M; Drießle T; Ledwig M; Sack I
Magn Reson Med; 2018 Jan; 79(1):470-478. PubMed ID: 28321914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Effect of normal compression on the shear modulus of soft tissue in rheological measurements.
Ayyildiz M; Cinoglu S; Basdogan C
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 Sep; 49():235-43. PubMed ID: 26042768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Magnetic resonance elastography in the liver at 3 Tesla using a second harmonic approach.
Herzka DA; Kotys MS; Sinkus R; Pettigrew RI; Gharib AM
Magn Reson Med; 2009 Aug; 62(2):284-91. PubMed ID: 19449374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Assessing Tumor Mechanics by MR Elastography at Different Strain Levels.
Pagé G; Tardieu M; Besret L; Blot L; Lopes J; Sinkus R; Van Beers BE; Garteiser P
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Dec; 50(6):1982-1989. PubMed ID: 31087619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
