These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23649712)

  • 41. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.
    Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Selective spatial attention modulates bottom-up informational masking of speech.
    Carlile S; Corkhill C
    Sci Rep; 2015 Mar; 5():8662. PubMed ID: 25727100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise: hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Summers V; Makashay MJ; Theodoroff SM; Leek MR
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):274-92. PubMed ID: 23636209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Measuring Mandarin Speech Recognition Thresholds Using the Method of Adaptive Tracking.
    Wang Y; Lu Z; Yang X; Liu C
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 62(6):2009-2017. PubMed ID: 31112665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effect of target-masker similarity on across-ear interference in a dichotic cocktail-party listening task.
    Brungart DS; Simpson BD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1724. PubMed ID: 17927432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effect of audibility on spatial release from speech-on-speech masking.
    Glyde H; Buchholz JM; Nielsen L; Best V; Dillon H; Cameron S; Hickson L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Nov; 138(5):3311-9. PubMed ID: 26627803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Masking of tones and speech by Schroeder-phase harmonic complexes in normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Summers V; Leek MR
    Hear Res; 1998 Apr; 118(1-2):139-50. PubMed ID: 9606069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effects of reference interaural time and intensity differences on binaural performance in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Koehnke J; Culotta CP; Hawley ML; Colburn HS
    Ear Hear; 1995 Aug; 16(4):331-53. PubMed ID: 8549890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comodulation masking release in speech identification with real and simulated cochlear-implant hearing.
    Ihlefeld A; Shinn-Cunningham BG; Carlyon RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb; 131(2):1315-24. PubMed ID: 22352505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Spatial release from masking in children with bilateral cochlear implants and with normal hearing: Effect of target-interferer similarity.
    Misurelli SM; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):319-31. PubMed ID: 26233032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The extent to which a position-based explanation accounts for binaural release from informational masking.
    Gallun FJ; Durlach NI; Colburn HS; Shinn-Cunningham BG; Best V; Mason CR; Kidd G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jul; 124(1):439-49. PubMed ID: 18646988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Masked Speech Perception Thresholds in Infants, Children, and Adults.
    Leibold LJ; Yarnell Bonino A; Buss E
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):345-53. PubMed ID: 26783855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Informational Masking Effects on Neural Encoding of Stimulus Onset and Acoustic Change.
    Niemczak CE; Vander Werff KR
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):156-167. PubMed ID: 29782442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Spatial release from energetic and informational masking in a divided speech identification task.
    Ihlefeld A; Shinn-Cunningham B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4380-92. PubMed ID: 18537389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Double-vowel perception in listeners with cochlear hearing loss: differences in fundamental frequency, ear of presentation, and relative amplitude.
    Arehart KH; Rossi-Katz J; Swensson-Prutsman J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Feb; 48(1):236-52. PubMed ID: 15938067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Suprathreshold Differences in Competing Speech Perception in Older Listeners With Normal and Impaired Hearing.
    Venezia JH; Leek MR; Lindeman MP
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Jul; 63(7):2141-2161. PubMed ID: 32603618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Intelligibility and detectability of speech measured diotically and dichotically in groups of listeners with, at most, "slight" hearing loss.
    Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Oct; 152(4):2013. PubMed ID: 36319233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Stimulus factors influencing spatial release from speech-on-speech masking.
    Kidd G; Mason CR; Best V; Marrone N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):1965-78. PubMed ID: 20968368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.