These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23649718)
1. Muscle-related differences in mechanomyography–force relationships are model-dependent. Cooper MA; Herda TJ Muscle Nerve; 2014 Feb; 49(2):202-8. PubMed ID: 23649718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Muscle-related differences in mechanomyography frequency-force relationships are model dependent. Herda TJ; Cooper MA Med Biol Eng Comput; 2015 Aug; 53(8):689-97. PubMed ID: 25805064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Time and frequency domain responses of the mechanomyogram and electromyogram during isometric ramp contractions: a comparison of the short-time Fourier and continuous wavelet transforms. Ryan ED; Cramer JT; Egan AD; Hartman MJ; Herda TJ J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2008 Feb; 18(1):54-67. PubMed ID: 17070700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability of absolute versus log-transformed regression models for examining the torque-related patterns of response for mechanomyographic amplitude. Herda TJ; Weir JP; Ryan ED; Walter AA; Costa PB; Hoge KM; Beck TW; Stout JR; Cramer JT J Neurosci Methods; 2009 May; 179(2):240-6. PubMed ID: 19428533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mechanomyographic amplitude and mean power frequency responses during isometric ramp vs. step muscle actions. Ryan ED; Beck TW; Herda TJ; Hartman MJ; Stout JR; Housh TJ; Cramer JT J Neurosci Methods; 2008 Mar; 168(2):293-305. PubMed ID: 18061275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The consistency of ordinary least-squares and generalized least-squares polynomial regression on characterizing the mechanomyographic amplitude versus torque relationship. Herda TJ; Housh TJ; Weir JP; Ryan ED; Costa PB; Defreitas JM; Walter AA; Stout JR; Beck TW; Cramer JT Physiol Meas; 2009 Feb; 30(2):115-28. PubMed ID: 19136735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inter-individual variability among the mechanomyographic and electromyographic amplitude and mean power frequency responses during isometric ramp muscle actions. Ryan ED; Cramer JT; Housh TJ; Beck TW; Herda TJ; Hartman MJ; Stout JR Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2007; 47(3):161-73. PubMed ID: 17557649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relationships between the mechanomyographic amplitude patterns of response and concentric isokinetic fatiguing tasks of the leg extensors. Cooper MA; Herda TJ; Vardiman JP; Gallagher PM; Fry AC Physiol Meas; 2013 Oct; 34(10):1293-301. PubMed ID: 24021893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An examination of mechanomyographic signal stationarity during concentric isokinetic, eccentric isokinetic and isometric muscle actions. Beck TW; Defreitas JM; Stock MS; Dillon MA Physiol Meas; 2010 Mar; 31(3):339-61. PubMed ID: 20130345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A noninvasive, log-transform method for fiber type discrimination using mechanomyography. Herda TJ; Housh TJ; Fry AC; Weir JP; Schilling BK; Ryan ED; Cramer JT J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2010 Oct; 20(5):787-94. PubMed ID: 20172740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inter-individual variability in the torque-related patterns of responses for mechanomyographic amplitude and mean power frequency. Ryan ED; Cramer JT; Housh TJ; Beck TW; Herda TJ; Hartman MJ J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Apr; 161(2):212-9. PubMed ID: 17187865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability of mechanomyographic amplitude and mean power frequency during isometric step and ramp muscle actions. Herda TJ; Ryan ED; Beck TW; Costa PB; DeFreitas JM; Stout JR; Cramer JT J Neurosci Methods; 2008 Jun; 171(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 18405977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. MMG and EMG responses during 25 maximal, eccentric, isokinetic muscle actions. Perry-Rana SR; Housh TJ; Johnson GO; Bull AJ; Cramer JT Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2003 Dec; 35(12):2048-54. PubMed ID: 14652501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An examination of the frequency-specific behavior of the mechanomyographic amplitude versus isometric torque relationship. Beck TW Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2009; 49(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 19280798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mechanomyographic responses of the superficial quadriceps femoris muscles to incremental isometric muscle actions. Coburn JW; Malek MH; Brown LE; Zinder SM Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Mar; 48(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 18435213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Linearity and reliability of the mechanomyographic amplitude versus dynamic torque relationships for the superficial quadriceps femoris muscles. Stock MS; Beck TW; Defreitas JM; Dillon MA Muscle Nerve; 2010 Mar; 41(3):342-9. PubMed ID: 19813206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mechanomyographic amplitude and mean power frequency versus torque relationships during isokinetic and isometric muscle actions of the biceps brachii. Beck TW; Housh TJ; Johnson GO; Weir JP; Cramer JT; Coburn JW; Malek MH J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2004 Oct; 14(5):555-64. PubMed ID: 15301774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Electromyographic and mechanomyographic responses across repeated maximal isometric and concentric muscle actions of the leg extensors. Camic CL; Housh TJ; Zuniga JM; Russell Hendrix C; Bergstrom HC; Traylor DA; Schmidt RJ; Johnson GO J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2013 Apr; 23(2):342-8. PubMed ID: 23102832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Electromyographic, but not mechanomyographic amplitude-force relationships, distinguished differences in voluntary activation capabilities between individuals. Herda TJ; Cooper MA J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2013 Apr; 23(2):356-61. PubMed ID: 23318003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]