These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23649838)

  • 1. Interactive effects in transfer-appropriate processing for event-based prospective memory: the roles of effort, ongoing task, and PM cue properties.
    Abney DH; McBride DM; Petrella SN
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Oct; 41(7):1032-45. PubMed ID: 23649838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Response dynamics in prospective memory.
    Abney DH; McBride DM; Conte AM; Vinson DW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Aug; 22(4):1020-8. PubMed ID: 25407659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A thorough examination of cue specificity and task-appropriateness in defining focal and nonfocal prospective memory tasks.
    Lyon BA; Hicks JL
    Memory; 2023 May; 31(5):665-677. PubMed ID: 36945870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of transfer-appropriate processing and multi-process frameworks for prospective memory performance.
    McBride DM; Abney DH
    Exp Psychol; 2012; 59(4):190-8. PubMed ID: 22411182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fitting an ex-Gaussian function to examine costs in event-based prospective memory: evidence for a continuous monitoring profile.
    Loft S; Bowden VK; Ball BH; Brewer GA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Oct; 152():177-82. PubMed ID: 25247678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of semantic context on prospective memory performance.
    Thomas BJ; McBride DM
    Memory; 2016; 24(3):315-23. PubMed ID: 25647351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Context cue focality influences strategic prospective memory monitoring.
    Hunter Ball B; Bugg JM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Aug; 25(4):1405-1415. PubMed ID: 29435962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Proactive control processes in event-based prospective memory: Evidence from intraindividual variability and ex-Gaussian analyses.
    Ball BH; Brewer GA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 May; 44(5):793-811. PubMed ID: 29239624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of action coordination for prospective memory: Task-interruption demands affect intention realization.
    Rummel J; Wesslein AK; Meiser T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 May; 43(5):717-735. PubMed ID: 27736115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ongoing task delays affect prospective memory more powerfully than filler task delays.
    Martin BA; Brown NL; Hicks JL
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2011 Mar; 65(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 21443330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing time-based and event-based prospective memory over short delays.
    Conte AM; McBride DM
    Memory; 2018 Aug; 26(7):936-945. PubMed ID: 29380656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Wait a second: Brief delays in responding reduce focality effects in event-based prospective memory.
    Loft S; Remington RW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(7):1432-47. PubMed ID: 23281819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Event-based prospective memory deficits in individuals with high depressive symptomatology: problems controlling attentional resources?
    Li YR; Loft S; Weinborn M; Maybery MT
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2014; 36(6):577-87. PubMed ID: 24848441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Let it go: the flexible engagement and disengagement of monitoring processes in a non-focal prospective memory task.
    Cohen AL; Gordon A; Jaudas A; Hefer C; Dreisbach G
    Psychol Res; 2017 Mar; 81(2):366-377. PubMed ID: 26820461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the relationship between effort toward an ongoing task and cue detection in event-based prospective memory.
    Marsh RL; Hicks JL; Cook GI
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jan; 31(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 15641905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of delay of prospective memory cues in an ongoing task on prospective memory task performance.
    McBride DM; Beckner JK; Abney DH
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Oct; 39(7):1222-31. PubMed ID: 21560010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Focal/nonfocal cue effects in prospective memory: monitoring difficulty or different retrieval processes?
    Scullin MK; McDaniel MA; Shelton JT; Lee JH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):736-49. PubMed ID: 20438269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance predictions affect attentional processes of event-based prospective memory.
    Rummel J; Kuhlmann BG; Touron DR
    Conscious Cogn; 2013 Sep; 22(3):729-41. PubMed ID: 23703025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The flexible engagement of monitoring processes in non-focal and focal prospective memory tasks with salient cues.
    Hefer C; Cohen AL; Jaudas A; Dreisbach G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Sep; 179():42-53. PubMed ID: 28711672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of temporal delay and repeated prospective memory cue exposure on the deactivation of completed intentions.
    Walser M; Plessow F; Goschke T; Fischer R
    Psychol Res; 2014 Jul; 78(4):584-96. PubMed ID: 23918213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.