262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23649880)
1. Institutional review board barriers and solutions encountered in the Collaboration Among Pharmacists and Physicians to Improve Outcomes Now Study: a national multicenter practice-based implementation trial.
Maclaughlin EJ; Ardery G; Jackson EA; Ives TJ; Young RB; Fike DS; Carter BL
Pharmacotherapy; 2013 Sep; 33(9):902-11. PubMed ID: 23649880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Variability of the institutional review board process within a national research network.
Khan MA; Barratt MS; Krugman SD; Serwint JR; Dumont-Driscoll M;
Clin Pediatr (Phila); 2014 Jun; 53(6):556-60. PubMed ID: 24658908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of institutional review board practice variation on observational health services research.
Green LA; Lowery JC; Kowalski CP; Wyszewianski L
Health Serv Res; 2006 Feb; 41(1):214-30. PubMed ID: 16430608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Review of multicenter studies by multiple institutional review boards: characteristics and outcomes for perinatal studies implemented by a multicenter network.
Abramovici A; Salazar A; Edvalson T; Gallagher N; Dorman K; Tita A;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 212(1):110.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25088862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Practice-based research network studies and institutional review boards: two new issues.
Yawn BP; Graham DG; Bertram SL; Kurland MJ; Dietrich AJ; Wollan PC; Brandt EC; Huff JM; Pace WD
J Am Board Fam Med; 2009; 22(4):453-60. PubMed ID: 19587261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Streamlining the institutional review board process in pragmatic randomized clinical trials: challenges and lessons learned from the Aspirin Dosing: A Patient-centric Trial Assessing Benefits and Long-Term Effectiveness (ADAPTABLE) trial.
Marquis-Gravel G; Robertson H; Jones WS; Riley D; Ford DE; Crenshaw D; Joosten YA; Rudov L; Hernandez AF; Hess R
Trials; 2021 Jan; 22(1):90. PubMed ID: 33494785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transitioning to the National Institutes of Health single institutional review board model: Piloting the use of the Streamlined, Multi-site, Accelerated Resources for Trials IRB Reliance.
Vardeny O; Hernandez AF; Cohen LW; Franklin A; Baqai M; Palmer S; Bierer BE; Cobb N
Clin Trials; 2019 Jun; 16(3):290-296. PubMed ID: 30866676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Variation in institutional review board responses to a standard, observational, pediatric research protocol.
Mansbach J; Acholonu U; Clark S; Camargo CA
Acad Emerg Med; 2007 Apr; 14(4):377-80. PubMed ID: 17312334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of a University's Institutional Review Board Based on Campus Feedback: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Rajab MH; Alkawi MZ; Gazal AM; Alshehri FA; Shaibah HS; Holmes LD
Cureus; 2019 Oct; 11(10):e5829. PubMed ID: 31754564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Navigating the institutional review board approval process in a multicenter observational critical care study.
Polito CC; Cribbs SK; Martin GS; O'Keeffe T; Herr D; Rice TW; Sevransky JE
Crit Care Med; 2014 May; 42(5):1105-9. PubMed ID: 24368345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of local institutional review board review on participation in national practice-based research network studies.
Finch SA; Barkin SL; Wasserman RC; Dhepyasuwan N; Slora EJ; Sege RD
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2009 Dec; 163(12):1130-4. PubMed ID: 19996050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Impact of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) on Clinical Innovation: A Survey of Investigators and IRB Members.
Stryjewski TP; Kalish BT; Silverman B; Lehmann LS
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Dec; 10(5):481-7. PubMed ID: 26564945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Duration and variation of the ethics approval process in Germany - an example from a non-interventional study with 44 participating centers].
Eichler M; Schmitt J; Schuler MK
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2019 Oct; 146():15-20. PubMed ID: 31473073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Time to institutional review board approval with local versus central review in a multicenter pragmatic trial.
Neuman MD; Gaskins LJ; Ziolek T;
Clin Trials; 2018 Feb; 15(1):107-111. PubMed ID: 28982261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The IRB challenge for practice-based research: strategies of the American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network (AAFP NRN).
Graham DG; Spano MS; Manning B
J Am Board Fam Med; 2007; 20(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 17341755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Implementing a Central IRB Model in a Multicenter Research Network.
Burr JS; Johnson AR; Vasenina V; Bisping S; Coleman RW; Botkin JR; Dean JM
Ethics Hum Res; 2019 May; 41(3):23-28. PubMed ID: 31108575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Costs and inconsistencies in US IRB review of low-risk medical education research.
Kano M; Getrich CM; Romney C; Sussman AL; Williams RL
Med Educ; 2015 Jun; 49(6):634-7. PubMed ID: 25989411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How do 66 European institutional review boards approve one protocol for an international prospective observational study on traumatic brain injury? Experiences from the CENTER-TBI study.
Timmers M; van Dijck JTJM; van Wijk RPJ; Legrand V; van Veen E; Maas AIR; Menon DK; Citerio G; Stocchetti N; Kompanje EJO;
BMC Med Ethics; 2020 May; 21(1):36. PubMed ID: 32398066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
