These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23649923)

  • 21. A model for the energy and angular distribution of x rays emitted from an x-ray tube. Part II. Validation of x-ray spectra from 20 to 300 kV.
    Omar A; Andreo P; Poludniowski G
    Med Phys; 2020 Sep; 47(9):4005-4019. PubMed ID: 32593216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. DQE of wireless digital detectors: comparative performance with differing filtration schemes.
    Samei E; Murphy S; Christianson O
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081910. PubMed ID: 23927324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of the imaging properties of two generations of a CCD-based system for digital chest radiography.
    Båth M; Sund P; Månsson LG
    Med Phys; 2002 Oct; 29(10):2286-97. PubMed ID: 12408303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Investigation of image quality identification utilizing physical image quality measurement in direct- and indirect-type of flat panel detectors and computed radiography].
    Yokoi T; Takata T; Ichikawa K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(11):1415-25. PubMed ID: 22104233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Investigation of measurement accuracy of factors used for detective quantum efficiency measurement in digital radiography].
    Kunitomo H; Koyama S; Higashide R; Ichikawa K; Hattori M; Okada Y; Hayashi N; Sawada M
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2014 Jul; 70(7):653-61. PubMed ID: 25055945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Detective quantum efficiency dependence on x-ray energy weighting in mammography.
    Cahn RN; Cederström B; Danielsson M; Hall A; Lundqvist M; Nygren D
    Med Phys; 1999 Dec; 26(12):2680-3. PubMed ID: 10619253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Detective quantum efficiency of x-ray image intensifiers: comparison of scintillation spectrum and rms methods.
    Rowlands JA; Taylor KW
    Med Phys; 1984; 11(5):597-601. PubMed ID: 6503873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. High-resolution imager for digital mammography: physical characterization of a prototype sensor.
    Suryanarayanan S; Karellas A; Vedantham S; Onishi SK
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):3957-69. PubMed ID: 16177523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of x-ray spectra on the DQE of a computed radiography system.
    Fetterly KA; Hangiandreou NJ
    Med Phys; 2001 Feb; 28(2):241-9. PubMed ID: 11243349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Performance evaluation of two computed radiography systems and patient dose in pelvic examination.
    Elshiekh E; Suliman II; Habbani F
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):392-6. PubMed ID: 25836691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Characterization of noise sources for two generations of computed radiography systems using powder and crystalline photostimulable phosphors.
    Mackenzie A; Honey ID
    Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3345-57. PubMed ID: 17879798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Large area CMOS active pixel sensor x-ray imager for digital breast tomosynthesis: Analysis, modeling, and characterization.
    Zhao C; Kanicki J; Konstantinidis AC; Patel T
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6294-308. PubMed ID: 26520722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Absolute measures of image quality for the Sens-A-Ray direct digital intraoral radiography system.
    Welander U; McDavid WD; Mörner AC; Tronje G; Tokuoka O; Fuchihata H; Nelvig P; Dove SB
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Sep; 80(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 7489279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Absorbed dose in AgBr in direct film for photon energies ( < 150 keV): relation to optical density. Theoretical calculation and experimental evaluation.
    Helmrot E; Alm Carlsson G
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 402():1-50. PubMed ID: 8677807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of the use of six diagnostic X-ray spectra computer codes.
    Meyer P; Buffard E; Mertz L; Kennel C; Constantinesco A; Siffert P
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Mar; 77(915):224-30. PubMed ID: 15020364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Detective quantum efficiency of photon-counting x-ray detectors.
    Tanguay J; Yun S; Kim HK; Cunningham IA
    Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 42(1):491-509. PubMed ID: 25563288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Image quality assessment in digital mammography: part I. Technical characterization of the systems.
    Marshall NW; Monnin P; Bosmans H; Bochud FO; Verdun FR
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jul; 56(14):4201-20. PubMed ID: 21701051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Analysis of the detective quantum efficiency of a developmental detector for digital mammography.
    Williams MB; Simoni PU; Smilowitz L; Stanton M; Phillips W; Stewart A
    Med Phys; 1999 Nov; 26(11):2273-85. PubMed ID: 10587208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Optical factors affecting the detective quantum efficiency of radiographic screens.
    Drangova M; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 1986; 13(2):150-7. PubMed ID: 3702809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Absorption and noise in cesium iodide x-ray image intensifiers.
    Rowlands JA; Taylor KW
    Med Phys; 1983; 10(6):786-95. PubMed ID: 6656692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.