914 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23650279)
1. The implementation of clay modeling and rat dissection into the human anatomy and physiology curriculum of a large urban community college.
Haspel C; Motoike HK; Lenchner E
Anat Sci Educ; 2014; 7(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 23650279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clay modeling as a method to learn human muscles: A community college study.
Motoike HK; O'Kane RL; Lenchner E; Haspel C
Anat Sci Educ; 2009; 2(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 19189347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Learning outcomes and student-perceived value of clay modeling and cat dissection in undergraduate human anatomy and physiology.
DeHoff ME; Clark KL; Meganathan K
Adv Physiol Educ; 2011 Mar; 35(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 21386004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Are all hands-on activities equally effective? Effect of using plastic models, organ dissections, and virtual dissections on student learning and perceptions.
Lombardi SA; Hicks RE; Thompson KV; Marbach-Ad G
Adv Physiol Educ; 2014 Mar; 38(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 24585474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Human clay models versus cat dissection: how the similarity between the classroom and the exam affects student performance.
Waters JR; Van Meter P; Perrotti W; Drogo S; Cyr RJ
Adv Physiol Educ; 2011 Jun; 35(2):227-36. PubMed ID: 21652509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computed tomography-enhanced anatomy course using enterprise visualization.
May H; Cohen H; Medlej B; Kornreich L; Peled N; Hershkovitz I
Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(5):332-41. PubMed ID: 23401203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Near-peer teaching in an anatomy course with a low faculty-to-student ratio.
Durán CE; Bahena EN; Rodríguez Mde L; Baca GJ; Uresti AS; Elizondo-Omaña RE; López SG
Anat Sci Educ; 2012; 5(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 22383124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Objective and subjective assessment of reciprocal peer teaching in medical gross anatomy laboratory.
Bentley BS; Hill RV
Anat Sci Educ; 2009; 2(4):143-9. PubMed ID: 19637291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors influencing students' decisions to participate in a short "dissection experience" within a systemic anatomy course.
Larkin TA; McAndrew DJ
Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(4):225-31. PubMed ID: 23213067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcomes of a rotational dissection system in gross anatomy.
Marshak DW; Oakes J; Hsieh PH; Chuang AZ; Cleary LJ
Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(5):438-44. PubMed ID: 25358463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The translucent cadaver: a follow-up study to gauge the efficacy of implementing changes suggested by students.
Kotzé SH; Driescher ND; Mole CG
Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(6):433-9. PubMed ID: 23533087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outcomes and satisfaction of two optional cadaveric dissection courses: A 3-year prospective study.
Pais D; Casal D; Mascarenhas-Lemos L; Barata P; Moxham BJ; Goyri-O'Neill J
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Mar; 10(2):127-136. PubMed ID: 27483443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ultrasound-based teaching of cardiac anatomy and physiology to undergraduate medical students.
Hammoudi N; Arangalage D; Boubrit L; Renaud MC; Isnard R; Collet JP; Cohen A; Duguet A
Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2013 Oct; 106(10):487-91. PubMed ID: 23911833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating dissection in the gross anatomy course: Correlation between quality of laboratory dissection and students outcomes.
Nwachukwu C; Lachman N; Pawlina W
Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 24799441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An innovative method for teaching anatomy in the predoctoral dental curriculum.
Baker EW; Slott PA; Terracio L; Cunningham EP
J Dent Educ; 2013 Nov; 77(11):1498-507. PubMed ID: 24192415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Model construction by students within an integrated medical curriculum.
Barling PM; Ramasamy P
Clin Teach; 2011 Mar; 8(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 21324071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perceptions of a mobile technology on learning strategies in the anatomy laboratory.
Mayfield CH; Ohara PT; O'Sullivan PS
Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(2):81-9. PubMed ID: 22927203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Are your students ready for anatomy and physiology? Developing tools to identify students at risk for failure.
Gultice A; Witham A; Kallmeyer R
Adv Physiol Educ; 2015 Jun; 39(2):108-15. PubMed ID: 26031727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Investigating the use of quick response codes in the gross anatomy laboratory.
Traser CJ; Hoffman LA; Seifert MF; Wilson AB
Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(5):421-8. PubMed ID: 25288343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Best teaching practices in anatomy education: A critical review.
Estai M; Bunt S
Ann Anat; 2016 Nov; 208():151-157. PubMed ID: 26996541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
