These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23650877)

  • 1. Perceptual training for visual search.
    Schuster D; Rivera J; Sellers BC; Fiore SM; Jentsch F
    Ergonomics; 2013; 56(7):1101-15. PubMed ID: 23650877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Examining perceptual and conceptual set biases in multiple-target visual search.
    Biggs AT; Adamo SH; Dowd EW; Mitroff SR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):844-55. PubMed ID: 25678271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detecting Bombs in X-Ray Images of Hold Baggage: 2D Versus 3D Imaging.
    Hättenschwiler N; Mendes M; Schwaninger A
    Hum Factors; 2019 Mar; 61(2):305-321. PubMed ID: 30247937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The speed of perception: the effects of over-speed video training on pitch recognition in collegiate softball players.
    DeCouto B; Robertson CT; Lewis D; Mann DTY
    Cogn Process; 2020 Feb; 21(1):77-93. PubMed ID: 31489521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detection measures for visual inspection of X-ray images of passenger baggage.
    Sterchi Y; Hättenschwiler N; Schwaninger A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1297-1311. PubMed ID: 30684203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual search behavior and performance in luggage screening: effects of time pressure, automation aid, and target expectancy.
    Rieger T; Heilmann L; Manzey D
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2021 Feb; 6(1):12. PubMed ID: 33630179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Training top-down attention improves performance on a triple-conjunction search task.
    Baluch F; Itti L
    PLoS One; 2010 Feb; 5(2):e9127. PubMed ID: 20174622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Similarity-based asymmetries in perceptual matching.
    Hodgetts CJ; Hahn U
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Feb; 139(2):291-9. PubMed ID: 22305350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating the effectiveness of different perceptual training methods in a difficult visual discrimination task with ultrasound images.
    Marris JE; Perfors A; Mitchell D; Wang W; McCusker MW; Lovell TJH; Gibson RN; Gaillard F; Howe PDL
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2023 Mar; 8(1):19. PubMed ID: 36940041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. No matter how: Top-down effects of verbal and semantic category knowledge on early visual perception.
    Maier M; Abdel Rahman R
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 19(4):859-876. PubMed ID: 30607831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The conceptual grouping effect: categories matter (and named categories matter more).
    Lupyan G
    Cognition; 2008 Aug; 108(2):566-77. PubMed ID: 18448087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Task-relevant perceptual features can define categories in visual memory too.
    Antonelli KB; Williams CC
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Nov; 45(8):1295-1305. PubMed ID: 28710599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual search strategy and perceptual organization covary with individual preference and structural complexity.
    Hogeboom M; van Leeuwen C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1997 Feb; 95(2):141-64. PubMed ID: 9062062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of regular aerobic exercise on visual perceptual learning.
    Connell CJW; Thompson B; Green H; Sullivan RK; Gant N
    Vision Res; 2018 Nov; 152():110-117. PubMed ID: 29183780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
    Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of conceptual processing on familiarity-based recognition.
    Ngo CT; Brown A; Sargent J; Dopkins S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2010 Mar; 64(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 20384421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Collaborative search in a mock baggage screening task.
    Enright A; McCarley JS
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Dec; 25(4):716-732. PubMed ID: 30816730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting Airport Screening Officers' Visual Search Competency With a Rapid Assessment.
    Mitroff SR; Ericson JM; Sharpe B
    Hum Factors; 2018 Mar; 60(2):201-211. PubMed ID: 29193997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Overcoming hurdles in translating visual search research between the lab and the field.
    Clark K; Cain MS; Adamo SH; Mitroff SR
    Nebr Symp Motiv; 2012; 59():147-81. PubMed ID: 23437633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A little bit of history repeating: Splitting up multiple-target visual searches decreases second-target miss errors.
    Cain MS; Biggs AT; Darling EF; Mitroff SR
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2014 Jun; 20(2):112-25. PubMed ID: 24708353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.