219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23651656)
1. Compatibility characteristics of five radiographic films utilised in Brazilian diagnostic radiology.
Magalhaes LA; Drexler GG; de Almeida CE
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Sep; 156(2):184-9. PubMed ID: 23651656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of radiographic image quality parameters obtained with the REX simulator.
Magalhaes LA; Drexler GG; deAlmeida CE
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Nov; 147(4):614-8. PubMed ID: 21273198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Image quality and breast dose of 24 screen-film combinations for mammography.
Dimakopoulou AD; Tsalafoutas IA; Georgiou EK; Yakoumakis EN
Br J Radiol; 2006 Feb; 79(938):123-9. PubMed ID: 16489193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Compliance of reviewing portal images on radiographic film vs an electronic medical record.
Chen GG; Hammoud A; Komajda M; Konski A
J Am Coll Radiol; 2012 Jul; 9(7):495-7. PubMed ID: 22748791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiographic mottle and patient exposure in mammography.
Barnes GT; Chakraborty DP
Radiology; 1982 Dec; 145(3):815-21. PubMed ID: 7146416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative reject analysis in conventional film-screen and digital storage phosphor radiography.
Peer S; Peer R; Giacomuzzi SM; Jaschke W
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):69-71. PubMed ID: 11487846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic quality versus patient exposure with five panoramic screen-film combinations.
D'Ambrosio JA; Schiff TG; McDavid WD; Langland OE
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Apr; 61(4):409-11. PubMed ID: 3458153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modified inverse square sensitometry for the determination of the characteristic curve of radiographic screen/film systems.
Yoshida A; Hiraki Y; Ohkawa Y; Yamada T; Hashimoto K; Aono K
Acta Med Okayama; 1986 Feb; 40(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 3962729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acceptance testing and routine quality control in general radiography: mobile units and film/screen fixed systems.
Gray L; Dowling A; Gallagher A; Gorman D; O'Connor U; Devine M; Larkin A; Walsh C; Malone JF
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):276-8. PubMed ID: 18326885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Films reject analysis for conventional radiography in Iranian main hospitals.
Roohi Shalemaei R
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):220-2. PubMed ID: 21764806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of image quality in digital chest imaging.
De Hauwere A; Bacher K; Smeets P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):174-7. PubMed ID: 16461499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of screen/film combinations for cephalometric radiography.
McNicol A; Stirrups DR
Br J Orthod; 1985 Jul; 12(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 3860251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A quality control programme for medical X-ray films in India.
Sharma R; Sharma SD
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jan; 148(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 21345880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Green-sensitive X-ray systems and specific features of working with them].
Blinov NN; Gorelik FG; Reznik KA
Med Tekh; 2002; (5):13-5. PubMed ID: 12512275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Further comparisons of films, screens and cassettes for mammography.
Law J; Kirkpatrick AE
Br J Radiol; 1990 Feb; 63(746):128-31. PubMed ID: 2310905
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Does quantity of film reading affect quality?
Given-Wilson R; Blanks R
Clin Radiol; 2011 Feb; 66(2):97-8. PubMed ID: 21216322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Reduction of radiation dosage by the use of newer reinforced rare earth films].
Hofmann T
Inf Orthod Kieferorthop; 1987; 19(1):107-10. PubMed ID: 3474210
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Image enhancer-television equipment--image quality and dose].
Larwin K
Strahlenschutz Forsch Prax; 1986; 27():43-7. PubMed ID: 3705125
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Sensitometric properties of Agfa Dentus OrthoLux, Agfa Dentus ST8G, and Kodak Ektavision panoramic radiographic film.
Wakoh M; Nishikawa K; Kobayashi N; Farman AG; Kuroyanagi K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Feb; 91(2):244-51. PubMed ID: 11174605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Problems with film processing in medical X-ray imaging in Lithuania.
Sniureviciute M; Adliene D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):260-3. PubMed ID: 15933118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
