These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23651779)

  • 1. [What happened to the structured interviews after coercive measures?].
    Bauer J
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2013 Apr; 175(17):1173. PubMed ID: 23651779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Legal demands for structured interviews after coercive measures are not followed].
    Asp S; Wium-Andersen I; Wang AG; Aggernæs KH
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2013 Apr; 175(17):1174-6. PubMed ID: 23651780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Frequency of coercive measures as a quality indicator for psychiatric hospitals?].
    Steinert T; Flammer E
    Nervenarzt; 2019 Jan; 90(1):35-39. PubMed ID: 30215134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Are coercive measures carried out arbitrarily?].
    Steinert T; Gebhardt RP
    Psychiatr Prax; 2000 Sep; 27(6):282-5. PubMed ID: 11050734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Methodological issues in monitoring the use of coercive measures.
    Janssen WA; van de Sande R; Noorthoorn EO; Nijman HL; Bowers L; Mulder CL; Smit A; Widdershoven GA; Steinert T
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2011; 34(6):429-38. PubMed ID: 22079087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Subjective experience of coercion in psychiatric care: a study comparing the attitudes of patients and healthy volunteers towards coercive methods and their justification.
    Mielau J; Altunbay J; Gallinat J; Heinz A; Bermpohl F; Lehmann A; Montag C
    Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2016 Jun; 266(4):337-47. PubMed ID: 25900468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [First conclusions from the register for coercive measures in Baden-Württemberg].
    Steinert T
    Nervenarzt; 2019 Sep; 90(9):956-957. PubMed ID: 31420691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Use of coercive measures in Norwegian psychiatric institutions].
    Høyer G; Drange H
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1991 May; 111(14):1709-13. PubMed ID: 2063377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Recording and reducing coercive measures in psychiatric hospitals].
    Steinert T; Baur M;
    Psychiatr Prax; 2004 Nov; 31 Suppl 1():S18-20. PubMed ID: 15570489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Long-Term Tendencies in the Use of Seclusion and Restraint in Five Psychiatric Hospitals in Germany].
    Steinert T; Zinkler M; Elsässer-Gaißmaier HP; Starrach A; Hoppstock S; Flammer E
    Psychiatr Prax; 2015 Oct; 42(7):377-83. PubMed ID: 25068687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality of Life and Functioning One Year After Experiencing Accumulated Coercive Events During Psychiatric Admission.
    Shannon S; Roche E; Madigan K; Renwick LJ; Dolan C; Devitt P; Feeney L; Murphy KC; O'Donoghue B
    Psychiatr Serv; 2015 Aug; 66(8):883-7. PubMed ID: 25873025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Architectural modernization of psychiatric hospitals influences the use of coercive measures].
    Rohe T; Dresler T; Stuhlinger M; Weber M; Strittmatter T; Fallgatter AJ
    Nervenarzt; 2017 Jan; 88(1):70-77. PubMed ID: 26820456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical course and prevalence of coercive measures: an observational study among involuntarily hospitalised psychiatric patients.
    Hotzy F; Moetteli S; Theodoridou A; Schneeberger AR; Seifritz E; Hoff P; Jäger M
    Swiss Med Wkly; 2018; 148():w14616. PubMed ID: 29698543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. One-year incidence and prevalence of seclusion: Dutch findings in an international perspective.
    Noorthoorn E; Lepping P; Janssen W; Hoogendoorn A; Nijman H; Widdershoven G; Steinert T
    Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 50(12):1857-69. PubMed ID: 26188503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Extralegal coercive measures in psychiatric wards-- patients' perspectives].
    Jensen HM; Poulsen HD
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 Feb; 168(6):578-80. PubMed ID: 16476219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of Complex Working Conditions on Nurses Who Exert Coercive Measures in Forensic Psychiatric Care.
    Gustafsson N; Salzmann-Erikson M
    J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv; 2016 Sep; 54(9):37-43. PubMed ID: 27576227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Cooperative model between psychiatric hospitals aiming at quality management of coercive measures].
    Ketelsen R; Zechert C; Driessen M
    Psychiatr Prax; 2007 Apr; 34 Suppl 2():S208-11. PubMed ID: 17394112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting use of coercive measures in Finland.
    Korkeila JA; Tuohimäki C; Kaltiala-Heino R; Lehtinen V; Joukamaa M
    Nord J Psychiatry; 2002; 56(5):339-45. PubMed ID: 12470307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Coercive measures in psychiatry. Restraint on psychiatric units of the Hannover Medical University].
    Bastiaan P; Debus S; Haltenhof H
    Psychiatr Prax; 1998 Sep; 25(5):231-4. PubMed ID: 9816602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Coercion within Danish psychiatry compared with 10 other European countries.
    Bak J; Aggernæs H
    Nord J Psychiatry; 2012 Oct; 66(5):297-302. PubMed ID: 22087631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.