These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23651841)

  • 1. Does skull shape mediate the relationship between objective features and subjective impressions about the face?
    Marečková K; Chakravarty MM; Huang M; Lawrence C; Leonard G; Perron M; Pike BG; Richer L; Veillette S; Pausova Z; Paus T
    Neuroimage; 2013 Oct; 79():234-40. PubMed ID: 23651841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Testosterone-mediated sex differences in the face shape during adolescence: subjective impressions and objective features.
    Marečková K; Weinbrand Z; Chakravarty MM; Lawrence C; Aleong R; Leonard G; Perron M; Pike GB; Richer L; Veillette S; Pausova Z; Paus T
    Horm Behav; 2011 Nov; 60(5):681-90. PubMed ID: 21983236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Craniofacial reconstruction using a combined statistical model of face shape and soft tissue depths: methodology and validation.
    Claes P; Vandermeulen D; De Greef S; Willems G; Suetens P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 May; 159 Suppl 1():S147-58. PubMed ID: 16540276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sex-specific differences of craniofacial traits in Croatia: the impact of environment in a small geographic area.
    Buretic-Tomljanovic A; Giacometti J; Ostojic S; Kapovic M
    Ann Hum Biol; 2007; 34(3):296-314. PubMed ID: 17612861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bayesian estimation of optimal craniofacial reconstructions.
    Claes P; Vandermeulen D; De Greef S; Willems G; Clement JG; Suetens P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Sep; 201(1-3):146-52. PubMed ID: 20359836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Craniofacial reconstruction as a prediction problem using a Latent Root Regression model.
    Berar M; Tilotta FM; Glaunès JA; Rozenholc Y
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Jul; 210(1-3):228-36. PubMed ID: 21482053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variation in soft-tissue thicknesses on the human face and their relation to craniometric dimensions.
    Simpson E; Henneberg M
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2002 Jun; 118(2):121-33. PubMed ID: 12012365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Facial soft tissue thickness in northwest Indian adults.
    Sahni D; Sanjeev ; Singh G; Jit I; Singh P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Apr; 176(2-3):137-46. PubMed ID: 17997243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relationship of the functional oropharynx to craniofacial morphology.
    Trenouth MJ; Timms DJ
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):419-23. PubMed ID: 10515139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting nose projection and pronasale position in facial approximation: a test of published methods and proposal of new guidelines.
    Stephan CN; Henneberg M; Sampson W
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2003 Nov; 122(3):240-50. PubMed ID: 14533182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Soft tissue facial morphology in obese adolescents: a three-dimensional noninvasive assessment.
    Ferrario VF; Dellavia C; Tartaglia GM; Turci M; Sforza C
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Feb; 74(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 15038489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A fully three-dimensional method for facial reconstruction based on deformable models.
    Quatrehomme G; Cotin S; Subsol G; Delingette H; Garidel Y; Grévin G; Fidrich M; Bailet P; Ollier A
    J Forensic Sci; 1997 Jul; 42(4):649-52. PubMed ID: 9243826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A PCA-Based method for determining craniofacial relationship and sexual dimorphism of facial shapes.
    Shui W; Zhou M; Maddock S; He T; Wang X; Deng Q
    Comput Biol Med; 2017 Nov; 90():33-49. PubMed ID: 28918063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sexual dimorphism in facial shapes and their discrimination in Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata).
    Koba R; Izumi A; Nakamura K
    J Comp Psychol; 2009 Aug; 123(3):326-33. PubMed ID: 19685975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Facial soft tissue thickness among various vertical facial patterns in adult Pakistani subjects.
    Jeelani W; Fida M; Shaikh A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Dec; 257():517.e1-517.e6. PubMed ID: 26476716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sex determination by three-dimensional geometric morphometrics of craniofacial form.
    Chovalopoulou ME; Valakos ED; Manolis SK
    Anthropol Anz; 2016; 73(3):195-206. PubMed ID: 27490899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reproducibility of facial soft tissue landmarks on facial images captured on a 3D camera.
    Othman SA; Ahmad R; Mericant AF; Jamaludin M
    Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 23785939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Soft tissue facial morphology related to headform: a three-dimensional quantitative analysis in childhood.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Poggio CE; Schmitz JH; Colombo A
    J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol; 1997; 17(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 9224943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Configuration of facial features influences subjective evaluation of facial type.
    Karavaka SM; Halazonetis DJ; Spyropoulos MN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):277-82. PubMed ID: 18249295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Size factor as one of the problems in the sex estimation of skulls: upper palaeolithic sample from Predmostí (Czech Republic) as an example.
    Sefcáková A; Katina S; Velemínski J; Brůzek J; Velemínský P; Thurzo M
    Anthropol Anz; 2010; 68(2):221-37. PubMed ID: 21452686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.