347 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23652037)
21. Advanced computed tomographic anatomical and morphometric plaque analysis for prediction of fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary lesions.
Opolski MP; Kepka C; Achenbach S; Pregowski J; Kruk M; Staruch AD; Kadziela J; Ruzyllo W; Witkowski A
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):135-41. PubMed ID: 24211037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of hemodynamically severe coronary stenosis as determined by fractional flow reserve with frequency domain optical coherence tomography measured anatomical parameters.
Zafar H; Ullah I; Dinneen K; Matiullah S; Hanley A; Leahy MJ; Sharif F
J Cardiol; 2014 Jul; 64(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 24368093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Optimized quantitative angiographic and intravascular ultrasound parameters predicting the functional significance of single de novo lesions in the left anterior descending artery.
Kwan TW; Yang S; Xu B; Chen J; Xu T; Ye F; Zhang JJ; Tian NL; Liu ZZ; Chen SL
Chin Med J (Engl); 2012 Dec; 125(23):4249-53. PubMed ID: 23217395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Accuracy of intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography in identifying functionally significant coronary stenosis according to vessel diameter: A meta-analysis of 2,581 patients and 2,807 lesions.
D'Ascenzo F; Barbero U; Cerrato E; Lipinski MJ; Omedè P; Montefusco A; Taha S; Naganuma T; Reith S; Voros S; Latib A; Gonzalo N; Quadri G; Colombo A; Biondi-Zoccai G; Escaned J; Moretti C; Gaita F
Am Heart J; 2015 May; 169(5):663-73. PubMed ID: 25965714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Prospective, head-to-head comparison of quantitative coronary angiography, quantitative computed tomography angiography, and intravascular ultrasound for the prediction of hemodynamic significance in intermediate and severe lesions, using fractional flow reserve as reference standard (from the ATLANTA I and II Study).
Voros S; Rinehart S; Vazquez-Figueroa JG; Kalynych A; Karmpaliotis D; Qian Z; Joshi PH; Anderson H; Murrieta L; Wilmer C; Carlson H; Ballard W; Brown C
Am J Cardiol; 2014 Jan; 113(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 24238960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Preintervention angiographic and intravascular ultrasound predictors for side branch compromise after a single-stent crossover technique.
Kang SJ; Mintz GS; Kim WJ; Lee JY; Park DW; Lee SW; Kim YH; Lee CW; Park SW; Park SJ
Am J Cardiol; 2011 Jun; 107(12):1787-93. PubMed ID: 21507367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Diagnostic accuracy of intravascular ultrasound-derived minimal lumen area compared with fractional flow reserve--meta-analysis: pooled accuracy of IVUS luminal area versus FFR.
Nascimento BR; de Sousa MR; Koo BK; Samady H; Bezerra HG; Ribeiro AL; Costa MA
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Sep; 84(3):377-85. PubMed ID: 23737441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in intermediate coronary artery disease: fractional flow reserve-guided versus intravascular ultrasound-guided.
Nam CW; Yoon HJ; Cho YK; Park HS; Kim H; Hur SH; Kim YN; Chung IS; Koo BK; Tahk SJ; Fearon WF; Kim KB
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Aug; 3(8):812-7. PubMed ID: 20723852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Myocardial Mass Contributes to the Discrepancy Between Anatomic Stenosis Severity Assessed by Intravascular Ultrasound and Fractional Flow Reserve in Intermediate Lesions of the Coronary Artery.
Yoon MH; Tahk SJ; Lim HS; Yang HM; Seo KW; Choi BJ; Choi SY; Hwang GS; Park JS; Shin JH
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 91(2):182-191. PubMed ID: 28568890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Intravascular Ultrasound-Derived Virtual Fractional Flow Reserve for the Assessment of Myocardial Ischemia.
Seike F; Uetani T; Nishimura K; Kawakami H; Higashi H; Fujii A; Aono J; Nagai T; Inoue K; Suzuki J; Inaba S; Okura T; Yasuda K; Higaki J; Ikeda S
Circ J; 2018 Feb; 82(3):815-823. PubMed ID: 29367514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Optical coherence tomography-derived anatomical criteria for functionally significant coronary stenosis assessed by fractional flow reserve.
Shiono Y; Kitabata H; Kubo T; Masuno T; Ohta S; Ozaki Y; Sougawa H; Orii M; Shimamura K; Ishibashi K; Komukai K; Yamano T; Tanimoto T; Ino Y; Yamaguchi T; Hirata K; Mizukoshi M; Imanishi T; Akasaka T
Circ J; 2012; 76(9):2218-25. PubMed ID: 22785153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of Fractional FLow Reserve And Intravascular ultrasound-guided Intervention Strategy for Clinical OUtcomes in Patients with InteRmediate Stenosis (FLAVOUR): Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial.
Kang J; Koo BK; Hu X; Lee JM; Hahn JY; Yang HM; Shin ES; Nam CW; Doh JH; Lee BK; Ahn C; Wang J; Tahk SJ
Am Heart J; 2018 May; 199():7-12. PubMed ID: 29754669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Diagnostic accuracy of intravascular ultrasound-derived minimal lumen area compared with fractional flow reserve.
Lopes JP; Jordan MK; Bezerra H; Costa MA; Attizzani G
Minerva Cardioangiol; 2017 Jun; 65(3):321-330. PubMed ID: 27958692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Mathematically Derived Criteria for Detecting Functionally Significant Stenoses Using Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography-Based Myocardial Segmentation and Intravascular Ultrasound-Measured Minimal Lumen Area.
Kang SJ; Kweon J; Yang DH; Lee JG; Jung J; Kim N; Mintz GS; Kang JW; Lim TH; Park SW; Kim YH
Am J Cardiol; 2016 Jul; 118(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 27236253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Correlation between 3D-QCA based FFR and quantitative lumen assessment by IVUS for left main coronary artery stenoses.
Tomaniak M; Masdjedi K; van Zandvoort LJ; Neleman T; Tovar Forero MN; Vermaire A; Kochman J; Kardys I; den Dekker W; Wilschut J; Diletti R; de Jaegere P; Van Mieghem NM; Zijlstra F; Daemen J
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Mar; 97(4):E495-E501. PubMed ID: 32725862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Diagnostic value of coronary CT angiography in comparison with invasive coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound in patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis: results from the prospective multicentre FIGURE-OUT (Functional Imaging criteria for GUiding REview of invasive coronary angiOgraphy, intravascular Ultrasound, and coronary computed Tomographic angiography) study.
Doh JH; Koo BK; Nam CW; Kim JH; Min JK; Nakazato R; Silalahi T; Prawira H; Choi H; Lee SY; Namgung J; Kwon SU; Kwak JJ; Lee WR
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Aug; 15(8):870-7. PubMed ID: 24513881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Influence of plaque characteristics on fractional flow reserve for coronary lesions with intermediate to obstructive stenosis: insights from integrated-backscatter intravascular ultrasound analysis.
Sakurai S; Takashima H; Waseda K; Gosho M; Kurita A; Ando H; Maeda K; Suzuki A; Fujimoto M; Amano T
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Oct; 31(7):1295-301. PubMed ID: 26129657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Advanced 2-dimensional quantitative coronary angiographic analysis for prediction of fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary stenoses.
Opolski MP; Pregowski J; Kruk M; Kepka C; Staruch AD; Witkowski A
J Thorac Imaging; 2014 Jul; 29(4):217-23. PubMed ID: 24247083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Functional and morphological assessment of side branch after left main coronary artery bifurcation stenting with cross-over technique.
Kang SJ; Ahn JM; Kim WJ; Lee JY; Park DW; Lee SW; Kim YH; Lee CW; Park SW; Park SJ
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Mar; 83(4):545-52. PubMed ID: 23765939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Intravascular ultrasound or optical coherence tomography-defined anatomic severity and hemodynamic severity assessed by coronary physiologic indices.
Lee JM; Choi KH; Koo BK; Zhang J; Han JK; Yang HM; Park KW; Song YB; Hahn JY; Choi SH; Gwon HC; Kim HS
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed); 2020 Oct; 73(10):812-821. PubMed ID: 31812517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
