351 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23652037)
41. Intravascular ultrasound criteria for the assessment of the functional significance of intermediate coronary artery stenoses and comparison with fractional flow reserve.
Briguori C; Anzuini A; Airoldi F; Gimelli G; Nishida T; Adamian M; Corvaja N; Di Mario C; Colombo A
Am J Cardiol; 2001 Jan; 87(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 11152827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Correlation between fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio with morphometric assessment by optical coherence tomography in diabetic patients.
Rivero F; Antuña P; García-Guimaraes M; Jiménez C; Cuesta J; Bastante T; Alfonso F
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Jul; 36(7):1193-1201. PubMed ID: 32221772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Diagnostic accuracy of intraluminal blood speckle intensity on intravascular ultrasound for physiological assessment of coronary artery stenosis.
Saito Y; Kitahara H; Nakayama T; Fujimoto Y; Kobayashi Y
Coron Artery Dis; 2017 Mar; 28(2):145-150. PubMed ID: 27906702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency signal analysis of blood speckles: Physiological assessment of intermediate coronary artery stenosis.
Okada K; Hibi K; Matsushita K; Yagami H; Tamura K; Honda Y; Kimura K
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Aug; 96(2):E155-E164. PubMed ID: 31778026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Incremental Value of Subtended Myocardial Mass for Identifying FFR-Verified Ischemia Using Quantitative CT Angiography: Comparison With Quantitative Coronary Angiography and CT-FFR.
Yang DH; Kang SJ; Koo HJ; Kweon J; Kang JW; Lim TH; Jung J; Kim N; Lee JG; Han S; Ahn JM; Park DW; Lee SW; Lee CW; Park SW; Park SJ; Mintz GS; Kim YH
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Apr; 12(4):707-717. PubMed ID: 29361491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Aggregate plaque volume by coronary computed tomography angiography is superior and incremental to luminal narrowing for diagnosis of ischemic lesions of intermediate stenosis severity.
Nakazato R; Shalev A; Doh JH; Koo BK; Gransar H; Gomez MJ; Leipsic J; Park HB; Berman DS; Min JK
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Jul; 62(5):460-7. PubMed ID: 23727206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Clinical potential of intravascular ultrasound for physiological assessment of coronary stenosis: relationship between quantitative ultrasound tomography and pressure-derived fractional flow reserve.
Takagi A; Tsurumi Y; Ishii Y; Suzuki K; Kawana M; Kasanuki H
Circulation; 1999 Jul; 100(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 10411848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Comparison between instantaneous wave-free ratio versus morphometric assessments by intracoronary imaging.
Matsushita K; Hibi K; Okada K; Sakamaki K; Akiyama E; Kimura Y; Matsuzawa Y; Maejima N; Iwahashi N; Tsukahara K; Kosuge M; Ebina T; Fitzgerald PJ; Honda Y; Tamura K; Kimura K
Heart Vessels; 2019 Jun; 34(6):926-935. PubMed ID: 30535756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Diagnostic performance of quantitative coronary computed tomography angiography and quantitative coronary angiography to predict hemodynamic significance of intermediate-grade stenoses.
Ghekiere O; Dewilde W; Bellekens M; Hoa D; Couvreur T; Djekic J; Coolen T; Mancini I; Vanhoenacker PK; Dendale P; Nchimi A
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Dec; 31(8):1651-61. PubMed ID: 26323355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Simultaneous assessment of coronary stenosis relevance with automated computed tomography angiography and intravascular ultrasound analyses and fractional flow reserve.
Blanco PJ; Bulant CA; Bezerra CG; Lemos PA; García-García HM
Coron Artery Dis; 2022 Jan; 31(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 34010182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Correlation between coronary computed tomographic angiography and fractional flow reserve.
Kristensen TS; Engstrøm T; Kelbæk H; von der Recke P; Nielsen MB; Kofoed KF
Int J Cardiol; 2010 Oct; 144(2):200-5. PubMed ID: 19427706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Physiology- or Imaging-Guided Strategies for Intermediate Coronary Stenosis.
Yang S; Kang J; Hwang D; Zhang J; Jiang J; Hu X; Hahn JY; Nam CW; Doh JH; Lee BK; Kim W; Huang J; Jiang F; Zhou H; Chen P; Tang L; Jiang W; Chen X; He W; Ahn SG; Yoon MH; Kim U; Lee JM; Ki YJ; Shin ES; Kim HS; Tahk SJ; Wang J; Koo BK
JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Jan; 7(1):e2350036. PubMed ID: 38170524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Quantitative computed tomographic coronary angiography: does it predict functionally significant coronary stenoses?
Rossi A; Papadopoulou SL; Pugliese F; Russo B; Dharampal AS; Dedic A; Kitslaar PH; Broersen A; Meijboom WB; van Geuns RJ; Wragg A; Ligthart J; Schultz C; Petersen SE; Nieman K; Krestin GP; de Feyter PJ
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Jan; 7(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 24280729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Morphometric assessment of coronary stenosis relevance with optical coherence tomography: a comparison with fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound.
Gonzalo N; Escaned J; Alfonso F; Nolte C; Rodriguez V; Jimenez-Quevedo P; Bañuelos C; Fernández-Ortiz A; Garcia E; Hernandez-Antolin R; Macaya C
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 Mar; 59(12):1080-9. PubMed ID: 22421301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography for the prediction of functional severity in true bifurcation lesions: Insights from the randomized DK-CRUSH II, III, and IV trials.
Zhang YJ; Zhu H; Shi SY; Muramatsu T; Pan DR; Ye F; Zhang JJ; Tian NL; Bourantas CV; Chen SL
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Mar; 87 Suppl 1():589-98. PubMed ID: 26876688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. New set of intravascular ultrasound-derived anatomic criteria for defining functionally significant stenoses in small coronary arteries (results from Intravascular Ultrasound Diagnostic Evaluation of Atherosclerosis in Singapore [IDEAS] study).
Lee CH; Tai BC; Soon CY; Low AF; Poh KK; Yeo TC; Lim GH; Yip J; Omar AR; Teo SG; Tan HC
Am J Cardiol; 2010 May; 105(10):1378-84. PubMed ID: 20451682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Hemodynamic impact of changes in bifurcation geometry after single-stent cross-over technique assessed by intravascular ultrasound and fractional flow reserve.
Kang SJ; Kim WJ; Lee JY; Park DW; Lee SW; Kim YH; Lee CW; Mintz GS; Park SW; Park SJ
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Dec; 82(7):1075-82. PubMed ID: 23592548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. [Association between fractional flow reserve and quantitative coronary angiography parameters in intermediate coronary artery stenosis].
Sun LJ; Mi L; Cui M; Guo LJ; Zhang YZ; Zhang FC; Niu J; Li HY; Wang GS; Han JL; Gao W; Li D; Li CP
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2012 Sep; 40(9):742-6. PubMed ID: 23141085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Validation of minimal luminal area measured by intravascular ultrasound for assessment of functionally significant coronary stenosis comparison with myocardial perfusion imaging.
Ahn JM; Kang SJ; Mintz GS; Oh JH; Kim WJ; Lee JY; Park DW; Lee SW; Kim YH; Lee CW; Park SW; Moon DH; Park SJ
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Jun; 4(6):665-71. PubMed ID: 21700253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Long-term outcome of intravascular ultrasound application in patients with moderate coronary lesions and grey-zone fractional flow reserve.
Li L; Li B; Xie H; Zhai CJ; Liu QW; Zhang HZ; Cui LQ
Coron Artery Dis; 2016 May; 27(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 26807621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
