These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23652327)
1. Hearing performance with 2 different high-power sound processors for osseointegrated auditory implants. Kurz A; Caversaccio M; Kompis M Otol Neurotol; 2013 Jun; 34(4):604-10. PubMed ID: 23652327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparisons of sound processors based on osseointegrated implants in patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss. Pfiffner F; Caversaccio MD; Kompis M Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jul; 32(5):728-35. PubMed ID: 21646934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of sound processing strategies for osseointegrated bone conduction implants in mixed hearing loss: multiple-channel nonlinear versus single-channel linear processing. Desmet JB; Bosman AJ; Snik AF; Lambrechts P; Hol MK; Mylanus EA; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P Otol Neurotol; 2013 Jun; 34(4):598-603. PubMed ID: 23615167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Audiological results with Baha in conductive and mixed hearing loss. Pfiffner F; Caversaccio MD; Kompis M Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2011; 71():73-83. PubMed ID: 21389707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is complex signal processing for bone conduction hearing aids useful? Kompis M; Kurz A; Pfiffner F; Senn P; Arnold A; Caversaccio M Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 May; 15 Suppl 1():S47-50. PubMed ID: 24869443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Speech understanding in quiet and in noise with the bone-anchored hearing aids Baha Compact and Baha Divino. Kompis M; Krebs M; Häusler R Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Aug; 127(8):829-35. PubMed ID: 17762993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of speech discrimination in noise and directional hearing with 2 different sound processors of a bone-anchored hearing system in adults with unilateral severe or profound sensorineural hearing loss. Wesarg T; Aschendorff A; Laszig R; Beck R; Schild C; Hassepass F; Kroeger S; Hocke T; Arndt S Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1064-70. PubMed ID: 23856626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of 2 implantable bone conduction devices in patients with single-sided deafness using a daily alternating method. Desmet JB; Wouters K; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):1018-26. PubMed ID: 22772008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bone-anchored Hearing Aids: correlation between pure-tone thresholds and outcome in three user groups. Pfiffner F; Kompis M; Stieger C Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):884-90. PubMed ID: 19730146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparative study on speech in noise understanding with a direct acoustic cochlear implant in subjects with severe to profound mixed hearing loss. Lenarz T; Verhaert N; Desloovere C; Desmet J; D'hondt C; González JC; Kludt E; Macías AR; Skarżyński H; Van de Heyning P; Vyncke C; Wasowski A Audiol Neurootol; 2014; 19(3):164-74. PubMed ID: 24556905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Audiological and subjective benefit results in bone-anchored hearing device users. Boleas-Aguirre MS; Bulnes Plano MD; de Erenchun Lasa IR; Ibáñez Beroiz B Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):494-503. PubMed ID: 22472615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparative study of hearing aids and round window application of the vibrant sound bridge (VSB) for patients with mixed or conductive hearing loss. Marino R; Linton N; Eikelboom RH; Statham E; Rajan GP Int J Audiol; 2013 Apr; 52(4):209-18. PubMed ID: 23527900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bone-anchored hearing aid system application for unilateral congenital conductive hearing impairment: audiometric results. Kunst SJ; Leijendeckers JM; Mylanus EA; Hol MK; Snik AF; Cremers CW Otol Neurotol; 2008 Jan; 29(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 18199951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Unilateral and Bilateral Audiological Benefit With an Adhesively Attached, Noninvasive Bone Conduction Hearing System. Gawliczek T; Munzinger F; Anschuetz L; Caversaccio M; Kompis M; Wimmer W Otol Neurotol; 2018 Sep; 39(8):1025-1030. PubMed ID: 30015748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The bone conduction implant: Clinical results of the first six patients. Reinfeldt S; Håkansson B; Taghavi H; Fredén Jansson KJ; Eeg-Olofsson M Int J Audiol; 2015 Jun; 54(6):408-16. PubMed ID: 25705995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An overview of different systems: the bone-anchored hearing aid. Dun CAJ; Faber HT; de Wolf MJF; Cremers CWRJ; Hol MKS Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2011; 71():22-31. PubMed ID: 21389701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preliminary functional results and quality of life after implantation of a new bone conduction hearing device in patients with conductive and mixed hearing loss. Ihler F; Volbers L; Blum J; Matthias C; Canis M Otol Neurotol; 2014 Feb; 35(2):211-5. PubMed ID: 24448279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Benefit of a commercially available cochlear implant processor with dual-microphone beamforming: a multi-center study. Wolfe J; Parkinson A; Schafer EC; Gilden J; Rehwinkel K; Mansanares J; Coughlan E; Wright J; Torres J; Gannaway S Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):553-60. PubMed ID: 22588233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification. Lin LM; Bowditch S; Anderson MJ; May B; Cox KM; Niparko JK Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 16436986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]