117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23652542)
1. Optimisation of patient dose for the horizontal beam technique in lateral lumbar spine radiographic examinations.
Davis AT; Hopkins SA
Br J Radiol; 2013 Jul; 86(1027):20130053. PubMed ID: 23652542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Towards the establishment of national diagnostic reference levels for abdomen, KUB, and lumbar spine x-ray examinations in Sri Lanka: a multi-centric study.
Welarathna S; Velautham S; Sarasanandarajah S
J Radiol Prot; 2024 Apr; 44(2):. PubMed ID: 38537259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating the use of higher kVp and copper filtration as a dose optimisation tool in digital planar radiography.
Mifsud K; Portelli JL; Zarb F; Couto JG
Radiography (Lond); 2022 Aug; 28(3):586-592. PubMed ID: 35504239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. PATIENT DOSES IN COMMON DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY EXAMINATIONS.
Metaxas VI; Messaris GA; Lekatou AN; Petsas TG; Panayiotakis GS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Jul; 184(1):12-27. PubMed ID: 30289498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How does a non-optimal tube potential influence radiation dose to the patient in lumbar spine radiography?
Alukic E; Mekis N
Radiography (Lond); 2021 Nov; 27(4):1105-1109. PubMed ID: 34011453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Local reference dose evaluation in conventional radiography examinations in Iran.
Shirin Shandiz M; Bahreyni Toosi MT; Farsi S; Yaghobi K
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 15(2):4550. PubMed ID: 24710442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dose management for X-ray and CT: systematic comparison of exposition values from two institutes to diagnostic reference levels and use of results for optimisation of exposition.
Schäfer S; Alejandre-Lafont E; Schmidt T; Gizewski ER; Fiebich M; Krombach GA
Rofo; 2014 Aug; 186(8):785-94. PubMed ID: 24691838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimisation of the lateral lumbar spine projection using an air-gap technique.
Bellizzi A; Zarb F
Radiography (Lond); 2020 Aug; 26(3):227-233. PubMed ID: 32052755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. "Anode heel effect" on patient dose in lumbar spine radiography.
Fung KK; Gilboy WB
Br J Radiol; 2000 May; 73(869):531-6. PubMed ID: 10884750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An evaluation of the effect of tube potential on clinical image quality using direct digital detectors for pelvis and lumbar spine radiographs.
Peacock NE; Steward AL; Riley PJ
J Med Radiat Sci; 2020 Dec; 67(4):260-268. PubMed ID: 32495517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Light beam diaphragm collimation errors and their effects on radiation dose for pelvic radiography.
Brookfield H; Manning-Stanley A; England A
Radiol Technol; 2015; 86(4):379-91. PubMed ID: 25835404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. LUMBAR SPINE RADIOGRAPHY: LOWER ORGAN DOSE WITH THE USE OF PA PROJECTION.
Alukić E; Mekiš N
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 186(4):507-512. PubMed ID: 31034550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of exposure parameters in plain radiography: a comparative study with European guidelines.
Lança L; Silva A; Alves E; Serranheira F; Correia M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):316-20. PubMed ID: 18430717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Increased radiation dose and projected radiation-related lifetime cancer risk in patients with obesity due to projection radiography.
Alqahtani SJM; Welbourn R; Meakin JR; Palfrey RM; Rimes SJ; Thomson K; Knapp KM
J Radiol Prot; 2019 Jan; 39(1):38-53. PubMed ID: 30569898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient dose measurements in diagnostic radiology procedures in Montenegro.
Milatović A; Ciraj-Bjelac O; Ivanović S; Jovanović S; Spasić-Jokić V
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 May; 149(4):454-63. PubMed ID: 21775317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Review of Kerma-Area Product and total energy incident on patients in radiography, mammography and CT.
Yao H; Huda W; Mah E; He W
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Feb; 163(2):251-60. PubMed ID: 24821931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The radiation dose, clinical and anatomical implications of erect lumbar spine radiography: A single centre pre-post implementation evaluation.
Bradley C; Snaith B
Radiography (Lond); 2023 Jul; 29(4):690-696. PubMed ID: 37187066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Survey of patient doses from conventional diagnostic radiographic examinations in Syria.
Kharita MH; Khedr MS; Wannus KM
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Jul; 140(2):163-5. PubMed ID: 20332131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patient doses and dosimetric evaluations in interventional cardiology.
Bor D; Olğar T; Toklu T; Cağlan A; Onal E; Padovani R
Phys Med; 2009 Mar; 25(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 18440265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. X-ray examination dose surveys: how accurate are my results?
Taylor S; Van Muylem A; Howarth N; Gevenois PA; Tack D
Eur Radiol; 2019 Oct; 29(10):5307-5313. PubMed ID: 30877467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
