These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23652623)

  • 21. Influencing factors associated with the mode of birth among childbearing women in Hunan Province: a cross-sectional study in China.
    Shi Y; Jiang Y; Zeng Q; Yuan Y; Yin H; Chang C; Pang R
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 May; 16():108. PubMed ID: 27185247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Change of childbirth preference after delivery among nulliparous Chinese women and their partners.
    Li WY; Liabsuetrakul T; Stray-Pedersen B
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Jan; 40(1):184-91. PubMed ID: 24102777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Information for women after CS: are they getting enough?
    Lucas A
    RCM Midwives; 2004 Nov; 7(11):472-5. PubMed ID: 15612178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Deciding on the mode of birth after a previous caesarean section - An online survey investigating women's preferences in Western Switzerland.
    Bonzon M; Gross MM; Karch A; Grylka-Baeschlin S
    Midwifery; 2017 Jul; 50():219-227. PubMed ID: 28478374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Maternal request for cesarean section due to fear of birth: can it be changed through crisis-oriented counseling?
    Nerum H; Halvorsen L; Sørlie T; Oian P
    Birth; 2006 Sep; 33(3):221-8. PubMed ID: 16948722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. NIH State-of-the-Science Conference Statement on cesarean delivery on maternal request.
    NIH Consens State Sci Statements; 2006 Mar 27-29; 23(1):1-29. PubMed ID: 17308552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Women's knowledge and attitude towards mode of delivery and frequency of cesarean section on mother's request in six public and private hospitals in Tehran, Iran, 2012.
    Ghotbi F; Akbari Sene A; Azargashb E; Shiva F; Mohtadi M; Zadehmodares S; Farzaneh F; Yasai FA
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 May; 40(5):1257-66. PubMed ID: 24689693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Elective cesarean section or not? Maternal age and risk of adverse outcomes at term: a population-based registry study of low-risk primiparous women.
    Herstad L; Klungsøyr K; Skjærven R; Tanbo T; Forsén L; Åbyholm T; Vangen S
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Aug; 16():230. PubMed ID: 27535233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Women's request for a cesarean section: a critique of the literature.
    Gamble JA; Creedy DK
    Birth; 2000 Dec; 27(4):256-63. PubMed ID: 11251511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cesarean section in Shanghai: women's or healthcare provider's preferences?
    Deng W; Klemetti R; Long Q; Wu Z; Duan C; Zhang WH; Ronsmans C; Zhang Y; Hemminki E
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2014 Aug; 14():285. PubMed ID: 25148697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Increasing cesarean section rates: exploring the role of culture in an Australian community.
    Walker R; Turnbull D; Wilkinson C
    Birth; 2004 Jun; 31(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 15153131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
    Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
    Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Historic cohort study on mode of delivery of a macrosomic baby: the women's point of view.
    Vercellini P; Fumagalli M; Consonni D; de Braud L; Barbara G; Iurlaro E; Mosca F; Fedele L
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Nov; 94(11):1235-44. PubMed ID: 26248808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A Decade of Wishes-Changes in Maternal Preference of the Mode of Delivery among Polish Women over the Last Decade.
    Jodzis A; Walędziak M; Czajkowski K; Różańska-Walędziak A
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2021 Jun; 57(6):. PubMed ID: 34205066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. How much influence do women in Sweden have on caesarean section? A follow-up study of women's preferences in early pregnancy.
    Hildingsson I
    Midwifery; 2008 Mar; 24(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 17197058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Elective cesarean delivery: does it have a negative effect on breastfeeding?
    Zanardo V; Svegliado G; Cavallin F; Giustardi A; Cosmi E; Litta P; Trevisanuto D
    Birth; 2010 Dec; 37(4):275-9. PubMed ID: 21083718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Personality and mode of delivery.
    Wiklund I; Edman G; Larsson C; Andolf E
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(10):1225-30. PubMed ID: 17068682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Satisfaction with cesarean section: qualitative analysis of open-ended questions in a large postal survey.
    Porter M; van Teijlingen E; Chi Ying Yip L; Bhattacharya S
    Birth; 2007 Jun; 34(2):148-54. PubMed ID: 17542819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cesarean delivery: background, trends, and epidemiology.
    Menacker F; Declercq E; Macdorman MF
    Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):235-41. PubMed ID: 17011392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A critique of the literature on women's request for cesarean section.
    Gamble J; Creedy DK; McCourt C; Weaver J; Beake S
    Birth; 2007 Dec; 34(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 18021149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.