146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23652850)
1. Diagnostic value of commercially available shear-wave elastography for breast cancers: integration into BI-RADS classification with subcategories of category 4.
Youk JH; Gweon HM; Son EJ; Han KH; Kim JA
Eur Radiol; 2013 Oct; 23(10):2695-704. PubMed ID: 23652850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of standard breast ultrasonography by adding two-dimensional and three-dimensional shear wave elastography: a prospective, multicenter trial.
Xu J; Zhang L; Wen W; He Y; Wei T; Zheng Y; Pan X; Li Y; Wu Y; Dong F; Zhang H; Cheng W; Xu H; Zhang Y; Bao L; Zhang X; Tang S; Liao J; Luo H; Zhao H; Tian J; Peng Y
Eur Radiol; 2024 Feb; 34(2):945-956. PubMed ID: 37644151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Shear wave elastography for breast masses is highly reproducible.
Cosgrove DO; Berg WA; Doré CJ; Skyba DM; Henry JP; Gay J; Cohen-Bacrie C;
Eur Radiol; 2012 May; 22(5):1023-32. PubMed ID: 22210408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative shear wave ultrasound elastography: initial experience in solid breast masses.
Evans A; Whelehan P; Thomson K; McLean D; Brauer K; Purdie C; Jordan L; Baker L; Thompson A
Breast Cancer Res; 2010; 12(6):R104. PubMed ID: 21122101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The value of elastography strain rate ratio in benign and malignant BI-RADS-US 3-4 breast masses.
Li X; Sun W; Zhang H
Biomol Biomed; 2024 May; 24(3):625-632. PubMed ID: 38149832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant BI-RADS 4 Breast Masses by Contrastenhanced Ultrasound Combined with Shear Wave Elastography.
Weng L; Yu M
Curr Med Imaging; 2023 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 37921152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The value of quantitative and a new qualitative color pattern shear wave elastography for the differentiation of ACR TI-RADS 4 or 5 category thyroid nodules measuring ≤10 mm.
Yi AJ; Yang WW; Cui XW; Dietrich CF; Wang B
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2023; 14():1275256. PubMed ID: 38260152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intra- and Interobserver Reliability of Shear Wave Elastography in Breast Cancer Diagnosis.
Togawa R; Pfob A; Büsch C; Fastner S; Gomez C; Goncalo M; Hennigs A; Killinger K; Nees J; Riedel F; Schäfgen B; Stieber A; Tozaki M; Heil J; Barr R; Golatta M
J Ultrasound Med; 2024 Jan; 43(1):109-114. PubMed ID: 37772458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interobserver and intermethod variability in data interpretation of breast strain elastography in suspicious breast lesions.
Turnaoğlu H; Haberal KM; Arslan S; Yavuz Çolak M; Ulu Öztürk F; Uslu N
Turk J Med Sci; 2021 Apr; 51(2):547-554. PubMed ID: 32950046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound shear wave elastography combined with superb microvascular imaging for breast tumors: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bian J; Zhang J; Hou X
Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Jun; 100(25):e26262. PubMed ID: 34160389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative analysis of conventional ultrasound and shear wave elastography features in primary breast diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Zhang XD; Zhang K
World J Clin Cases; 2023 Nov; 11(33):7994-8002. PubMed ID: 38075578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative ultrasound analysis for classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast masses.
Moon WK; Lo CM; Chang JM; Huang CS; Chen JH; Chang RF
J Digit Imaging; 2013 Dec; 26(6):1091-8. PubMed ID: 23494603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic Utility of Surrounding Tissue Hardness in Breast Masses: A Quantitative Analysis Using Shear Wave Elastography to Distinguish Malignancy Across Various Mass Sizes.
Yan P; Song X; Fan W
Altern Ther Health Med; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38743897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of Invasive Breast Cancer Using Mass Characteristic Frequency and Elasticity in Correlation with Prognostic Histologic Features and Immunohistochemical Biomarkers.
Gu J; Polley EC; Boughey JC; Fazzio RT; Fatemi M; Alizad A
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2021 Aug; 47(8):2193-2201. PubMed ID: 33994231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The value of microvascular Doppler ultrasound technique, qualitative or quantitative shear-wave elastography of breast lesions for predicting axillary nodal burden in patients with breast cancer.
Wang B; Yang J; Tang YL; Chen YY; Luo J; Cui XW; Dietrich CF; Yi AJ
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2024 Jan; 14(1):408-420. PubMed ID: 38223085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of gel pads on the measurement of breast superficial lesions by shear wave elastography.
Zhang Z; He S; Zhong Y; Zou H; Cai L; Zhang Y; Wang H
Ann Med; 2023; 55(2):2269941. PubMed ID: 37871181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of shear-wave elastography to distinguish complex and complicated fibroadenomas from simple fibroadenomas.
Başara Akın I; Özgül H; Altay C; Seçil M; Durak MG; Gürel D; Balcı P
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2023 Sep; 29(5):674-681. PubMed ID: 36994883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Feasibility of Classifying Breast Masses Using a Computer-Assisted Diagnosis (CAD) System Based on Ultrasound Elastography and BI-RADS Lexicon.
Fleury EFC; Gianini AC; Marcomini K; Oliveira V
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jan; 17():1533033818763461. PubMed ID: 29551088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Classification of multi-feature fusion ultrasound images of breast tumor within category 4 using convolutional neural networks.
Xu P; Zhao J; Wan M; Song Q; Su Q; Wang D
Med Phys; 2024 Jun; 51(6):4243-4257. PubMed ID: 38436433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating diagnostic significance: The utilization of elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound for differential diagnosis in breast lesions.
Wen P; Liu L; Pan L; Li X
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38758994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
